CRSP vs NTLA: How CRISPR Therapeutics AG and Intellia Therapeutics Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CRSP and NTLA share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CRSP and NTLA exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

CRISPR Therapeutics AG is a Swiss-American biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, with principal research operations in Boston, Massachusetts. The company uses its proprietary CRISPR/Cas9 platform to develop gene-based medicines across hemoglobinopathies, oncology, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune conditions, and regenerative medicine. Its first and only commercialized product, Casgevy, is co-developed and co-commercialized with Vertex Pharmaceuticals under a 40/60 profit-sharing structure in which CRISPR retains 40 percent of profits. Revenue has historically been driven by collaboration milestone payments from Vertex rather than product sales, making the financial profile highly lumpy. Beyond Casgevy, the company generates no meaningful product revenue today and funds operations through its cash reserves.

Full CRSP guide

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, developing genome-editing therapies based on CRISPR/Cas9. Its core differentiator is a proprietary in vivo platform that delivers the editing machinery directly into the body, typically the liver, using lipid nanoparticles, so that a single dose can permanently inactivate or modify a disease-causing gene without removing cells from the patient. This contrasts with ex vivo approaches that edit cells outside the body and reinfuse them. The company is pre-revenue from products and currently records only collaboration revenue from partners; it funds operations through its cash reserves and periodic capital raises.

Full NTLA guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• CRSP drivers: First-Mover Advantage in Commercial Gene Editing; Casgevy's Long-Term Revenue Potential.
• NTLA drivers: Positive Late-Stage Lonvo-z Data in Hereditary Angioedema; In Vivo CRISPR Platform.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The commercial ramp of Casgevy has been far slower than early projections, with the therapy generating only approximately $3.5 million in revenue in all of 2025, down sharply from prior years that were boosted by one-time milestone payments. For NTLA, intellia is pre-revenue from products, deeply unprofitable, and its value depends on binary clinical and regulatory outcomes; a single failed trial, safety signal, or FDA setback for lonvo-z or nex-z could sharply reduce the stock's value.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CRSP if you believe its drivers more; NTLA if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CRSP and NTLA guides.

CRSP. Because CRISPR Therapeutics has no meaningful product profits yet, traditional earnings-based valuation multiples like P/E are negative and not analytically useful. The company is better evaluated on its cash runway, the pace of Casgevy's commercial adoption, and the risk-adjusted value of its pipeline. Enterprise value of roughly $2.8 billion (market cap less net cash) reflects the market pricing in significant execution uncertainty around both the Casgevy ramp and the broader pipeline, while a wide spread exists between bearish analyst targets near $33 and optimistic targets above $80.

NTLA. Because Intellia has no product profits and only collaboration revenue, traditional earnings-based valuation multiples like P/E are negative and not analytically useful. The stock is better evaluated on its cash runway relative to its burn rate, the probability and timing of regulatory approval for lonvo-z and nex-z, and the risk-adjusted commercial potential of those programs. The April 2026 equity raise extended the stated runway at least into 2028, but pre-profit biotechs of this type typically require additional capital before reaching sustained profitability, so dilution and the binary nature of trial readouts are central to any valuation view.

Headline figures (approximate, June 27, 2026 (data reflects most recently available reports through mid-2026)): CRSP shows revenue (full year 2025, product only) ~$3.5 million, revenue (full year 2024) ~$37.3 million (primarily collaboration revenue), net loss (ttm through q3 2025) ~$488 million, operating loss (full year 2025) ~$665 million; NTLA shows cash and marketable securities ~$517 million (as of March 31, 2026), plus ~$207 million gross from an April 2026 equity offering, stated cash runway Expected to fund operations at least into 2028, net loss (q1 2026) ~$96 million (versus ~$114 million in Q1 2025), revenue Collaboration revenue only (e.g., Regeneron); no product revenue yet.

CRSP and NTLA are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CRSP and NTLA exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.