HL vs PAAS: How Hecla Mining and Pan American Silver Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: PAAS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. HL and PAAS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined HL and PAAS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Hecla Mining is the largest primary silver producer in the United States and one of the oldest listed US mining companies, founded in 1891. It generates most of its revenue from silver and gold mined at four operations: the Greens Creek polymetallic mine in Alaska (its cornerstone asset), the deep Lucky Friday silver mine in Idaho, the Keno Hill silver district in Canada's Yukon, and the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. As a miner, Hecla sells the metal it produces into world markets, so its profitability is driven by two levers it partly controls (how many ounces it mines and at what cost) and one it does not (the market price of silver and gold).

Full HL guide

Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS) is a Vancouver-based precious-metals mining company and one of the largest primary silver producers in the world, with significant gold output alongside the silver. It operates a portfolio of mines spread across the Americas, including Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, Canada, Brazil, and Chile. The company makes money by mining and selling silver and gold (plus byproducts such as zinc, lead, and copper at some operations), so its revenue and margins are driven by how many ounces it produces relative to its mining costs and the prevailing silver and gold prices. In 2025 Pan American produced roughly 22.8 million ounces of silver and about 742,000 ounces of gold and reported record annual revenue of around $3.6 billion.

Full PAAS guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• HL drivers: Leverage to silver and gold prices; Record production and a silver-focused pivot.
• PAAS drivers: Silver-price leverage; MAG Silver and Juanicipio.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Hecla's single biggest risk is that it is a price-taker on silver and gold: a sharp risk-off move can send the metals, and HL stock, down 20% or more in a short span regardless of how well the mines run. For PAAS, pan American's results are highly cyclical and move with silver and gold prices, which are volatile and outside the company's control, so margins and the share price can swing sharply.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick HL if you believe its drivers more; PAAS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the HL and PAAS guides.

HL. Hecla's valuation looks elevated on trailing earnings, which is typical for miners because profits are depressed at lower metal prices and expand quickly when prices rise. As a leveraged play on silver and gold, its multiple can appear high or low depending on where analysts assume metal prices settle. Figures are as of July 2026 and move with commodity prices.

PAAS. Pan American's financials are commodity-driven: revenue, earnings, and valuation are dominated by silver and gold prices and by how many ounces it produces relative to its costs. Because it is a primary silver producer with byproduct gold and base metals, it offers operating leverage to the silver price in particular, so earnings can rise or fall faster than the metal itself. Precious-metals producer multiples often look elevated or depressed at different points in the cycle, so reading PAAS means weighing production growth, all-in sustaining costs, and the metal-price environment together rather than a single multiple.

Headline figures (approximate, JULY 2026): HL shows revenue (fy2025) ~$1.4 billion (up ~53%), net income (fy2025) ~$321 million (~$0.49/share), adjusted ebitda (fy2025) ~$670 million (record), silver production (fy2025) ~17.0 million ounces (record); PAAS shows silver production (2025) ~22.8 million ounces attributable, exceeding annual guidance, gold production (2025) ~742,000 ounces attributable, within guidance, revenue (2025 full year) ~$3.6 billion (record), with net earnings around $980 million, all-in sustaining costs Silver segment ~$14.50 to $16.00 per ounce; gold segment ~$1,700 to $1,850 per ounce.

HL and PAAS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined HL and PAAS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.