Is CRC a Buy or a Sell? The Bull and Bear Case (2026)

Last updated October 2026

Short answer

Both cases are real, which is why the question is contested. The bull case for California Resources Corporation (CRC) rests on A Brent-linked barrel in a high oil price year: California crude prices off Brent rather than off inland US benchmarks, and Brent averaged $96.87 in the second quarter of 2026 against $68.22 for full-year 2025. The bear case rests on the hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now. Analysts covering it publish targets from $59.00 to $91.00 against a $53.23 price, so even the professionals disagree by 42% of their own average. We do not give a verdict. What follows is each case at full strength, so you can decide which set of assumptions you actually believe. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

California Resources was spun out of Occidental Petroleum in 2014 and operates from Long Beach with about 2,500 employees. It produces crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas from the San Joaquin, Los Angeles and Sacramento basins in California, plus the Uinta basin in Utah, and it sells almost all of that output into California refineries. Proved reserves stood at about 654 million barrels of oil equivalent at the end of 2025, roughly 83% of it oil, concentrated in long-life conventional fields like Belridge and Elk Hills where decline rates are low and steamflood and waterflood techniques do most of the work. The company also owns gas-fired power generation that supplies its own field operations, and it runs a second reporting segment, Carbon TerraVault, which builds CO2 capture equipment and injects CO2 into depleted reservoirs. Its structural advantage is location: California imports more than 75% of the oil it consumes, so CRC's barrels price off Brent with a transportation-cost edge over waterborne imports into refineries already configured for California-style crude. On December 18, 2025 CRC closed an all-stock combination with Berry Corporation, issuing about 5.6 million shares at an exchange ratio of 0.0718, which left former Berry holders owning roughly 6% of the company and added the Utah acreage. The investment picture in October 2026 is a story about the gap between reported earnings and cash earnings. CRC posted a $711 million net loss in the first quarter of 2026, almost entirely a non-cash mark on its commodity derivative book as oil prices ran up, while adjusted net income was $79 million and adjusted EBITDAX was $304 million. Management then raised full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDAX guidance by 42% to a $1,450 million midpoint, lifted the capital budget to $520 to $560 million, and set out a seven-rig program for the second half (six rigs in California, one in Utah) targeting an exit rate near 175 MBoe/d. Preliminary second-quarter figures filed in July showed Brent at $96.87 and WTI at $92.79, with CRC realizing $91.64 a barrel before derivative settlements and $76.50 after, alongside a $190 million settlement loss. Two policy changes underpin the activity increase: Senate Bill 237, effective January 1, 2026, cleared the Kern County permitting logjam, and Assembly Bill 1207 extended California's cap-and-invest program through 2045. The full second-quarter report swung GAAP net income to about $514 million on revenue of about $1.09 billion as the derivative marks partly reversed, but adjusted EPS of about $0.99 fell well short of the roughly $1.37 consensus. In September 2026 CRC agreed to sell the Uinta basin assets it had acquired with Berry to an undisclosed buyer for about $90 million in cash, effective July 1 and expected to close by year-end, refocusing the company on California. Shares closed near $53.14 on October 16, 2026, up about 15% year to date and about 13% over twelve months, against a 52-week range of $43.24 to $71.98. Third-quarter results are scheduled for November 2, 2026, with consensus near $0.92 a share on about $932 million of revenue.

The bull case: what would have to be true for $91.00

The most optimistic published target on CRC is $91.00, +71.0% from the $53.23 price as of November 2026. Getting there needs the following to work close to its best case, not merely to avoid going wrong.

1. A Brent-linked barrel in a high oil price year.

California crude prices off Brent rather than off inland US benchmarks, and Brent averaged $96.87 in the second quarter of 2026 against $68.22 for full-year 2025. CRC realized $91.64 a barrel before derivative settlements in that quarter, and the oil weighting of about 81% means almost all of the mix captures that move. This is the single largest input to the 42% increase in 2026 adjusted EBITDAX guidance.

2. SB 237 reopening Kern County drilling.

Well permitting in Kern County had been effectively frozen by CEQA litigation for years. SB 237, enacted in September 2025 and effective January 2026, deemed the county's supplemental environmental review sufficient and allows up to 2,000 new drill wells a year for ten years. The trial court lifted its stay and the appeal deadline passed on February 2, 2026 with no appeal filed. CRC received permits for 66 new wells in the first quarter of 2026 and says it now holds enough to support the seven-rig second-half program.

3. Berry integration and the Utah leg.

The Berry combination closed in December 2025 for about 5.6 million CRC shares, added roughly 93 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves, and brought a Uinta basin position in Utah plus a well servicing and abandonment business. Management raised the expected annual synergy target range by 12% to $90 to $100 million in May 2026. Production rose to 154 MBoe/d in the first quarter of 2026 from 137 MBoe/d in the prior quarter, with $131 million of the quarter's oil and gas sales attributed to the Berry properties. The Utah leg proved short-lived: in September 2026 CRC agreed to sell the Uinta assets for about $90 million in cash, calling them non-core, with proceeds earmarked for shareholder returns and other corporate purposes and further guidance promised after closing.

4. Carbon TerraVault reaching first injection.

CRC announced first CO2 injection at Carbon TerraVault I on May 26, 2026, capturing CO2 at the Elk Hills cryogenic gas plant and storing it in the nearby 26R reservoir. The project is sized for up to 1.46 million metric tons a year against 38 million tons of total storage capacity, and the reservoir sits inside a joint venture with Brookfield in which CRC holds 51%. The segment is still a cost center (a $12 million segment loss in the first quarter of 2026) and its value depends on EPA permitting, 45Q tax credits and finding third-party emitters willing to pay for storage.

The bear case: what would have to be true for $59.00

The most pessimistic published target is $59.00, +10.8% from the current price. That is not a floor and not a forecast; it is roughly what one analyst thinks California Resources Corporation is worth if the risks below bite instead of the drivers above.

The hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now. Everything else runs on the oil price, which the company does not control and which cuts both ways. California is a uniquely hostile operating jurisdiction: CalGEM has prohibited well stimulation treatments, is running a five-year injection pressure reduction plan at the Wilmington field with the next phase on hold until fall 2026, and local ordinances continue to layer setbacks and restrictions on drilling. Refinery closures and declining in-state demand are a structural headwind to the customer base, and asset retirement obligations of about $906 million are a real long-dated liability for a producer with decades-old wells. The dividend and the repurchase program are both discretionary and priced off commodity cash flow, so a sustained oil downturn would pressure returns of capital, the roughly $1.3 billion debt load and the Berry integration at the same time.

The bear case deserves the same attention as the bull case, and usually gets less. If you are holding CRC already, the question is not whether these risks exist but whether any of them has moved from possible to actually happening in the reported numbers.

Where analysts land on CRC

12 analysts cover CRC, with an average target of $75.33 (+41.5% against $53.23) and a split of 12 buy, 1 hold, 0 sell. Bear in mind sell-side ratings skew positive across the whole market, so that split is not a balanced vote. The full target table, the recent rating actions by firm, and how the consensus has shifted are on the CRC forecast and price target page.

How is CRC valued? (as of October 2026)

Price
$53.23
Market cap
$4.73B
Forward P/E
14.28
Price / book
1.39
Beta
0.95
52-week range
$43.24 to $71.98

Snapshot for CRC as of November 2026, sourced from Yahoo Finance and may be delayed. Valuation figures move with price and earnings; verify the current numbers with your broker before deciding.

  • Revenue (TTM): ~$3.7B, up ~33% YoY in Q2 2026; GAAP figures include derivative marks
  • Q2 2026 earnings: ~$514M GAAP net income; adjusted EPS ~$0.99 vs ~$1.37 consensus
  • Net income (TTM): ~-$121M, after the ~$711M Q1 2026 derivative-driven loss
  • Production: ~154 MBoe/d (~81% oil) in Q1 2026, 2026 exit rate targeted near ~175 MBoe/d
  • Market cap / forward P/E: ~$4.7B at ~$53.14 a share, ~13.8x forward earnings
  • Dividend and balance sheet: ~$1.62 annualized (~3.05% yield), ~$1.35B debt, ~$56M cash
  • Next earnings: November 2, 2026; consensus EPS ~$0.92 on ~$932M revenue

Trailing GAAP numbers still mislead: the first-quarter derivative loss and second-quarter reversal leave trailing EPS near -$1.29, so the forward P/E near 13.8 times and cash-flow measures do more work, with operating cash flow of about $876 million and free cash flow near $300 million over the trailing year. Enterprise value near 11 times trailing EBITDA looks high only because reported EBITDA carries the hedge marks. Analysts remain positive, with a strong-buy consensus and a mean target near $75, although UBS trimmed its target to $68 from $73 in October after the second-quarter miss.

How do you decide if CRC is a buy?

Rather than asking whether CRC is a buy in the abstract, it tends to help to answer four questions:

  • Thesis: do you believe the bull case above, and is it still true today?
  • Time horizon: a single stock can be volatile, so a longer horizon absorbs more of the swings.
  • Position sizing: a thesis can be right and the sizing still wrong; decide how much of your portfolio one name should be.
  • Overlap: check whether you already hold CRC indirectly through an index or sector ETF before adding more.

What would change your mind on CRC

Write the tripwires down before you need them. Deciding what would falsify your view is far harder once a position is moving against you.

  • Bull case breaks if: A Brent-linked barrel in a high oil price year stalls in the reported numbers rather than in the narrative around them.
  • Bear case breaks if: the hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now fails to materialise over several reporting periods while the drivers keep compounding.
  • Neither matters if: the position has grown large enough that being wrong would damage the whole portfolio. Sizing overrides the argument.

For the full picture, see the CRC stock guide (what the company does, the ETFs that hold it, similar stocks, and the themes it fits). In Walnut you can ask its AI about CRC against your real portfolio and see your actual exposure before deciding.

Investing in California Resources Corporation with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how CRC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Is CRC a good stock to buy right now?

+

That depends on which case you find more convincing, and both are on this page. The bull case rests on A Brent-linked barrel in a high oil price year, with revenue (ttm) at ~$3.7B, up ~33% YoY in Q2 2026; GAAP figures include derivative marks. The bear case rests on the hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now. Analysts covering it are spread from $59.00 to $91.00, which is itself a signal that this is genuinely contested. If you believe the thesis, the real questions become sizing and overlap rather than timing. Walnut is not an investment adviser and this is not a recommendation.

Should I sell CRC?

+

Nobody can answer that for you, and the honest version of the question is narrower: has anything changed in the reason you bought it? The bear case on this page is the place to check. The hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now. If that risk is what you were worried about and it is now playing out, that is a real signal. If the price simply fell while the thesis held, that is a different situation entirely. The most pessimistic published target is $59.00, +10.8% from the $53.23 price, which is one analyst's downside case rather than a floor. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What is the bull case for CRC?

+

A Brent-linked barrel in a high oil price year. California crude prices off Brent rather than off inland US benchmarks, and Brent averaged $96.87 in the second quarter of 2026 against $68.22 for full-year 2025. The most optimistic analyst target on CRC is $91.00, +71.0% from the $53.23 price. That figure is only reachable if this thesis works close to its best case.

What is the bear case for CRC?

+

The hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now. Everything else runs on the oil price, which the company does not control and which cuts both ways. California is a uniquely hostile operating jurisdiction: CalGEM has prohibited well stimulation treatments, is running a five-year injection pressure reduction plan at the Wilmington field with the next phase on hold until fall 2026, and local ordinances continue to layer setbacks and restrictions on drilling. Refinery closures and declining in-state demand are a structural headwind to the customer base, and asset retirement obligations of about $906 million are a real long-dated liability for a producer with decades-old wells. The dividend and the repurchase program are both discretionary and priced off commodity cash flow, so a sustained oil downturn would pressure returns of capital, the roughly $1.3 billion debt load and the Berry integration at the same time. The most pessimistic published target is $59.00, +10.8% from the current price, which is roughly what the stock is worth if these risks bite rather than the drivers.

What does California Resources Corporation do?

+

California Resources is the state's largest independent oil and gas producer, with an attached carbon storage business called Carbon TerraVault.

What would have to change for CRC to stop being worth holding?

+

Decide that in advance, because it is far harder to think clearly once a position is moving against you. The concrete tripwires here: the driver behind the bull case (A Brent-linked barrel in a high oil price year) stalling in the reported numbers rather than in the narrative, the risk above (the hedge book is the most immediate distortion: CRC gave up about $15 a barrel to derivative settlements in the second quarter of 2026 ($76.50 realized after settlements versus $91.64 before), and the non-cash mark on those contracts produced a $711 million GAAP loss in the first quarter, so trailing earnings multiples are close to meaningless right now) turning from a possibility into a reported fact, or the position growing large enough that a bad outcome would matter to your whole portfolio regardless of who is right.

What does California Resources Corporation actually do?

+

It produces oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas, mostly in California's San Joaquin, Los Angeles and Sacramento basins, plus Uinta basin assets in Utah that it agreed in September 2026 to sell, and sells that output to California refineries and marketers. Production ran about 154 thousand barrels of oil equivalent a day in the first quarter of 2026 at roughly 81% oil. It also owns gas-fired power generation for its own fields and runs a carbon storage segment, Carbon TerraVault, which injects captured CO2 into depleted reservoirs.

Why did CRC report a $711 million loss in a quarter management called solid?

+

Because the loss was almost entirely a non-cash mark on its commodity derivative contracts. CRC hedges a meaningful share of its production, so when oil prices rise the fair value of those hedges falls and the change runs straight through reported revenue and operating income. The same quarter produced $79 million of adjusted net income, $304 million of adjusted EBITDAX and $99 million of operating cash flow. GAAP total operating revenues of $119 million for the quarter reflect a $848 million derivative loss netted against $905 million of actual oil, gas and NGL sales.

What did the Berry Corporation merger add?

+

The all-stock combination closed on December 18, 2025 at an exchange ratio of 0.0718 CRC shares per Berry share, about 5.6 million shares in total, leaving former Berry holders with roughly 6% of CRC. It added around 93 million barrels of oil equivalent of proved reserves, more San Joaquin acreage, a Uinta basin position in Utah and a well servicing and abandonment business. Management raised the expected annual synergy range by 12% to $90 to $100 million in May 2026. Berry's outstanding debt was repaid at closing. In September 2026 CRC agreed to sell the Utah piece of the deal, the Uinta assets, for about $90 million in cash, with closing expected by the end of 2026.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice, and gives no verdict on CRC. Analyst targets referenced here come from a November 2026 pull of published third-party research and change constantly. Verify current figures with your broker before acting on them.

The case for and against similar stocks