Is MAC a Buy or a Sell? The Bull and Bear Case (2026)
Last updated July 2026
Short answer
Both cases are real, which is why the question is contested. The bull case for The Macerich Company (MAC) rests on Deleveraging toward the 6x goal: Reducing leverage is the stated centerpiece of the Path Forward Plan, and progress has been measurable: net debt to adjusted EBITDA fell to about 7.3x in the second quarter of 2026, down more than 1.5 turns since the plan began, and lands near 6.8x pro forma for the forward equity proceeds. The bear case rests on dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. Analysts covering it publish targets from $19.00 to $30.00 against a $24.71 price, so even the professionals disagree by 41% of their own average. We do not give a verdict. What follows is each case at full strength, so you can decide which set of assumptions you actually believe. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
The Macerich Company, founded in 1964 and headquartered in Santa Monica, California, owns, leases and redevelops regional town centers in dense, higher-income US markets. Its holdings cluster in California, the Pacific Northwest, the Phoenix and Scottsdale corridor, and the stretch from metro New York to Washington, DC, with flagships including Tysons Corner Center, Queens Center, Scottsdale Fashion Square, Washington Square and Green Acres Mall. After several years of selling and handing back weaker assets, the portfolio sat at roughly 38 to 39 retail centers and about 40 million square feet as of the second quarter of 2026, down from 48 million square feet earlier in the program. Trailing 12-month tenant sales for spaces under 10,000 square feet reached about $919 per square foot, up from roughly $849 a year earlier, and trailing revenue runs near $1.03 billion. The investment picture is a leverage story wrapped around an operating recovery. Under CEO Jackson Hsieh, the Path Forward Plan has completed about $1.3 billion of dispositions, returned troubled centers to their lenders, bought out joint-venture partners on core assets, and pivoted to offense with the roughly $272 million Annapolis Mall purchase in May 2026. Funding that shift required real dilution: a 22.08 million share offering at $21.00, a 14 million share forward offering priced at $23.90, and a $675 million 2.25% exchangeable note due 2031. Net debt to adjusted EBITDA improved to about 7.3x in the second quarter, or roughly 6.8x pro forma for the forward equity, against a long-term target near 6x. Second-quarter FFO as adjusted came in at $0.35 per share on $249.7 million of revenue, while GAAP results stayed in the red at a $0.10 per share loss, which is normal for a depreciation-heavy landlord. At roughly $24.50 and a market capitalization near $7.0 billion, the shares price in a good deal of the company's own $1.80 to $2.00 per share 2028 FFO ambition.
The bull case: what would have to be true for $30.00
The most optimistic published target on MAC is $30.00, +21.4% from the $24.71 price as of August 2026. Getting there needs the following to work close to its best case, not merely to avoid going wrong.
1. Deleveraging toward the 6x goal
Reducing leverage is the stated centerpiece of the Path Forward Plan, and progress has been measurable: net debt to adjusted EBITDA fell to about 7.3x in the second quarter of 2026, down more than 1.5 turns since the plan began, and lands near 6.8x pro forma for the forward equity proceeds. Management frames the low-to-mid 6x range as reachable within a few years and holds 6x as the 2028 target. Total pro-rata debt across the portfolio stood at roughly $6.3 billion against about $1.2 billion of liquidity, so refinancing capacity has widened considerably from the plan's starting point.
2. The signed-not-open rent pipeline
Leases already signed but not yet paying rent are the most visible source of near-term FFO growth. The pipeline reached about $124 million of a $140 million target, with roughly $30 million of that revenue expected to land in 2026, $40 million to $45 million in 2027 and $45 million to $50 million in 2028. Because the rent is contracted rather than forecast, this pipeline is the reason go-forward NOI growth is expected to accelerate after 2026 rather than simply continue at the current pace.
3. Consolidating and upgrading the go-forward portfolio
Roughly 90% of go-forward NOI now comes from Class A assets, a mix achieved by shedding weaker centers and concentrating capital in the survivors. Annapolis Mall was acquired at a targeted stabilized yield in the 9% to 11% range, and in-process redevelopment at FlatIron Crossing, Green Acres Mall and Scottsdale Fashion Square carries estimated costs of about $459 million to $505 million. Another $300 million to $400 million of dispositions is expected by the end of 2026, which keeps the mix shifting toward the higher-productivity end.
4. Tenant productivity and leasing leverage
Occupancy and sales productivity both moved the right way in the second quarter: total portfolio leased occupancy hit 94% and go-forward occupancy reached 95.5%, up about 270 basis points year over year, on 1.3 million square feet of new and renewal leases signed. Tenant sales per square foot of roughly $919 give Macerich a stronger negotiating position on renewals than the mall sector's reputation implies. Of 2026 lease expirations, about 93% were committed to renew with another 6% at the letter-of-intent stage.
The bear case: what would have to be true for $19.00
The most pessimistic published target is $19.00, -23.1% from the current price. That is not a floor and not a forecast; it is roughly what one analyst thinks The Macerich Company is worth if the risks below bite instead of the drivers above.
Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. Tenant credit remains a live drag, with Forever 21's liquidation alone releasing about 570,000 square feet across Macerich centers and Claire's filing again in 2025, so backfilling vacancy is a permanent operating expense rather than a one-time event. Property-level debt still bites: the $76 million loan secured by Twenty Ninth Street in Boulder sat in default after its February maturity, and while a single mortgage default is not a corporate solvency issue, it shows the asset-by-asset workout is unfinished. GAAP net losses persist and the dividend, at $0.17 per quarter or roughly $0.68 annualized, was cut deeply from pre-2020 levels and is covered by FFO rather than by earnings. Finally, the valuation itself is a risk: near 16 times trailing FFO and roughly 13 times the midpoint of the company's own 2028 target, the shares already assume the plan lands close to schedule, so a missed disposition, a rate move, or a weaker consumer would hit the multiple and the estimates at the same time.
The bear case deserves the same attention as the bull case, and usually gets less. If you are holding MAC already, the question is not whether these risks exist but whether any of them has moved from possible to actually happening in the reported numbers.
Where analysts land on MAC
16 analysts cover MAC, with an average target of $26.62 (+7.7% against $24.71) and a split of 9 buy, 6 hold, 1 sell. Bear in mind sell-side ratings skew positive across the whole market, so that split is not a balanced vote. The full target table, the recent rating actions by firm, and how the consensus has shifted are on the MAC forecast and price target page.
How is MAC valued? (as of August 2026)
Snapshot for MAC as of August 2026, sourced from Yahoo Finance and may be delayed. Valuation figures move with price and earnings; verify the current numbers with your broker before deciding.
- Revenue (TTM): ~$1.03B (Q2 2026: ~$249.7M, first half: ~$491.2M)
- FFO as adjusted per share: ~$0.35 in Q2 2026 and ~$0.70 for the first half, versus ~$1.50 for full-year 2025
- GAAP net loss per share: ~$(0.10) in Q2 2026, ~$(0.24) for the first half
- Net debt / adjusted EBITDA: ~7.3x, or ~6.8x pro forma for forward equity, against a ~6x 2028 target
- Total pro-rata debt: ~$6.3B including joint ventures (~$4.8B of consolidated mortgage notes)
- Market cap and dividend: ~$7.0B at ~$24.50, dividend ~$0.68 annualized (~2.8% yield), roughly 16x trailing FFO as adjusted
FFO per share has been close to flat while total FFO rose, because the 2026 equity raises expanded the denominator faster than the operating recovery expanded the numerator. Management's public bridge to $1.80 to $2.00 of 2028 FFO per share leans on the signed-not-open rent pipeline, cheaper refinancing as leverage falls, and yield on the Annapolis and redevelopment spend. Against that target the current price sits near 13 times, so the multiple is doing less work than the execution is.
How do you decide if MAC is a buy?
Rather than asking whether MAC is a buy in the abstract, it tends to help to answer four questions:
- Thesis: do you believe the bull case above, and is it still true today?
- Time horizon: a single stock can be volatile, so a longer horizon absorbs more of the swings.
- Position sizing: a thesis can be right and the sizing still wrong; decide how much of your portfolio one name should be.
- Overlap: check whether you already hold MAC indirectly through an index or sector ETF before adding more.
What would change your mind on MAC
Write the tripwires down before you need them. Deciding what would falsify your view is far harder once a position is moving against you.
- Bull case breaks if: Deleveraging toward the 6x goal stalls in the reported numbers rather than in the narrative around them.
- Bear case breaks if: dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew fails to materialise over several reporting periods while the drivers keep compounding.
- Neither matters if: the position has grown large enough that being wrong would damage the whole portfolio. Sizing overrides the argument.
For the full picture, see the MAC stock guide (what the company does, the ETFs that hold it, similar stocks, and the themes it fits). In Walnut you can ask its AI about MAC against your real portfolio and see your actual exposure before deciding.
Investing in The Macerich Company with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MAC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
Is MAC a good stock to buy right now?
+
That depends on which case you find more convincing, and both are on this page. The bull case rests on Deleveraging toward the 6x goal, with revenue (ttm) at ~$1.03B (Q2 2026: ~$249.7M, first half: ~$491.2M). The bear case rests on dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. Analysts covering it are spread from $19.00 to $30.00, which is itself a signal that this is genuinely contested. If you believe the thesis, the real questions become sizing and overlap rather than timing. Walnut is not an investment adviser and this is not a recommendation.
Should I sell MAC?
+
Nobody can answer that for you, and the honest version of the question is narrower: has anything changed in the reason you bought it? The bear case on this page is the place to check. Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. If that risk is what you were worried about and it is now playing out, that is a real signal. If the price simply fell while the thesis held, that is a different situation entirely. The most pessimistic published target is $19.00, -23.1% from the $24.71 price, which is one analyst's downside case rather than a floor. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What is the bull case for MAC?
+
Deleveraging toward the 6x goal. Reducing leverage is the stated centerpiece of the Path Forward Plan, and progress has been measurable: net debt to adjusted EBITDA fell to about 7.3x in the second quarter of 2026, down more than 1.5 turns since the plan began, and lands near 6.8x pro forma for the forward equity proceeds. The most optimistic analyst target on MAC is $30.00, +21.4% from the $24.71 price. That figure is only reachable if this thesis works close to its best case.
What is the bear case for MAC?
+
Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. Tenant credit remains a live drag, with Forever 21's liquidation alone releasing about 570,000 square feet across Macerich centers and Claire's filing again in 2025, so backfilling vacancy is a permanent operating expense rather than a one-time event. Property-level debt still bites: the $76 million loan secured by Twenty Ninth Street in Boulder sat in default after its February maturity, and while a single mortgage default is not a corporate solvency issue, it shows the asset-by-asset workout is unfinished. GAAP net losses persist and the dividend, at $0.17 per quarter or roughly $0.68 annualized, was cut deeply from pre-2020 levels and is covered by FFO rather than by earnings. Finally, the valuation itself is a risk: near 16 times trailing FFO and roughly 13 times the midpoint of the company's own 2028 target, the shares already assume the plan lands close to schedule, so a missed disposition, a rate move, or a weaker consumer would hit the multiple and the estimates at the same time. The most pessimistic published target is $19.00, -23.1% from the current price, which is roughly what the stock is worth if these risks bite rather than the drivers.
What does The Macerich Company do?
+
The Macerich Company is a REIT that owns, leases and redevelops Class A regional town centers in dense, higher-income US markets.
What would have to change for MAC to stop being worth holding?
+
Decide that in advance, because it is far harder to think clearly once a position is moving against you. The concrete tripwires here: the driver behind the bull case (Deleveraging toward the 6x goal) stalling in the reported numbers rather than in the narrative, the risk above (dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew) turning from a possibility into a reported fact, or the position growing large enough that a bad outcome would matter to your whole portfolio regardless of who is right.
Who trades under the ticker MAC?
+
MAC is The Macerich Company, a retail real estate investment trust listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It should not be confused with MAC Cosmetics (a brand owned by Estee Lauder, not separately listed) or with Macquarie Infrastructure, which used the same ticker years ago. Macerich remains fully listed with no delisting determination, and it filed a Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
What is Macerich's dividend and is it covered?
+
The board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.17 per common share payable in late September 2026, which annualizes to roughly $0.68 and works out near a 2.8% yield at about $24.50. Measured against roughly $1.40 to $1.50 of annualized FFO as adjusted, coverage runs a little above 2x, which is conservative for a REIT and reflects the decision to direct cash toward deleveraging and redevelopment. The payout was cut sharply during the 2020 to 2021 period and has not been restored to its old level.
Why look at FFO instead of EPS for Macerich?
+
Real estate depreciation is a large non-cash charge that runs through a REIT's income statement even when buildings are holding or gaining value, which is why Macerich reports a GAAP net loss of about $0.10 per share in a quarter it also earned $0.35 per share of FFO as adjusted. Funds from operations adds depreciation and amortization back and strips out property sale gains, giving a closer read on recurring cash generation. Because REITs must distribute most of their taxable income, dividend coverage is also judged against FFO, not EPS.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice, and gives no verdict on MAC. Analyst targets referenced here come from a August 2026 pull of published third-party research and change constantly. Verify current figures with your broker before acting on them.