Is NEXA a Buy or a Sell? The Bull and Bear Case (2026)

Last updated July 2026

Short answer

Both cases are real, which is why the question is contested. The bull case for Nexa Resources (NEXA) rests on Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work: LME zinc averaged ~$3,466 per tonne (~$1.57 per pound) in the second quarter of 2026, up ~31% year over year, and ~$3,351 per tonne across the first half, up ~22%. The bear case rests on the dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. Analysts covering it publish targets from $13.50 to $16.00 against a $15.40 price, so even the professionals disagree by 17% of their own average. We do not give a verdict. What follows is each case at full strength, so you can decide which set of assumptions you actually believe. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Nexa Resources S.A. is an integrated zinc business incorporated in Luxembourg, headquartered operationally in Brazil and Peru, and reporting in US dollars under IFRS. It runs five mines: Cerro Lindo, El Porvenir and Atacocha in Peru (the latter two forming the Cerro Pasco Complex) plus Vazante and Aripuanã in Brazil. Cerro Lindo and Vazante both sit among the world's thirty largest zinc-producing mines. It also owns three smelters, Cajamarquilla in Lima (the only operating zinc smelter in Peru and the fifth largest globally by volume), plus Três Marias and Juiz de Fora in Minas Gerais, which are the only units of their kind in Latin America excluding Mexico. Zinc accounted for ~46.9% of mined metal production in 2025 on a zinc-equivalent basis, with copper, lead, silver and a little gold produced as by-products that get credited against cash cost. The two segments are structurally different businesses: mining sells concentrate and earns the metal price, while smelting buys concentrate and earns a conversion spread, and in the second quarter of 2026 Nexa's own mines supplied ~54% of smelter feed. The investment picture in August 2026 is a commodity cycle catching an operational recovery at the same time. Second-quarter 2026 net revenues were ~$908 million (up ~28% year over year), net income ~$98 million against ~$13 million a year earlier, and Adjusted EBITDA ~$286 million (up ~78%) at a ~31.5% margin, ~8.8 percentage points wider than the prior-year quarter. LME zinc averaged ~$3,466 per tonne in the quarter, up ~31% year over year, and silver averaged ~$73.1 per ounce, up ~117%, which is why the mining segment's cash cost net of by-products ran at ~negative $0.35 per pound in the first half. Net leverage fell to ~1.40x from ~2.28x a year earlier on ~$1,476 million of net debt against ~$1,055 million of trailing Adjusted EBITDA. The stock closed at ~$15.40 on August 21, 2026 for a market value near ~$2.04 billion, against a 52-week range of ~$4.70 to ~$16.89, after zinc hit a four-year high near ~$3,823 per tonne. That works out to roughly ~7.4x trailing earnings, ~0.6x sales and ~3.3x enterprise value to trailing Adjusted EBITDA, multiples that reflect both the commodity's cyclicality and the fact that ~64.68% of the company is not for sale to the public market.

The bull case: what would have to be true for $16.00

The most optimistic published target on NEXA is $16.00, +3.9% from the $15.40 price as of August 2026. Getting there needs the following to work close to its best case, not merely to avoid going wrong.

1. Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work

LME zinc averaged ~$3,466 per tonne (~$1.57 per pound) in the second quarter of 2026, up ~31% year over year, and ~$3,351 per tonne across the first half, up ~22%. Silver averaged ~$73.1 per ounce in the quarter and ~$78.8 across the first half, up ~141% versus the prior-year period, which matters disproportionately because silver is a payable by-product in Nexa's copper and lead concentrates and is credited straight against mining cash cost. By August 21, 2026 zinc had reached a four-year high near ~$3,823 per tonne on Peruvian and Bolivian mine-supply shortfalls. Concentrate scarcity is the mechanism: spot treatment charges in China ended the quarter at ~negative $109 per tonne CIF, which squeezes merchant smelters and rewards integrated producers that feed their own furnaces.

2. Volume recovery is the internal story for the second half

First-half zinc production reached ~159kt, up ~13%, against unchanged full-year guidance of ~310kt to ~360kt, so the guidance implies a materially heavier second half. Three specific unlocks sit behind that: Aripuanã commissioned its fourth tailings filter and exited June at ~86% average capacity utilization after filtration had been the binding constraint, Cerro Lindo began block caving in July (a first for Nexa, intended to lower unit costs and reach higher-grade copper), and Cajamarquilla built cathode inventory during the May fire that is scheduled to convert into recovered volume. Copper is the visible weak spot at ~12.7kt in the first half, down ~24%, against ~26kt to ~30kt guided for the year.

3. Deleveraging and the Cerro Lindo silver stream step-down

Net debt of ~$1,476 million is roughly flat year over year, but leverage fell to ~1.40x from ~2.28x purely because trailing Adjusted EBITDA rose to ~$1,055 million from ~$665 million. The debt itself is unusually well-termed for a mid-cap miner: ~7.0 years average maturity at a ~6.22% average cost, with only ~8% (~$133 million) maturing through the end of 2027 against ~$707 million of available liquidity including the undrawn ~$320 million revolving facility. Separately, Nexa reached the delivery threshold under the Cerro Lindo silver streaming agreement during the quarter, cutting the streamed share of silver production from ~65% to ~25% effective in May. That is a permanent uplift to cash generation from an asset already owned, requiring no incremental capital.

4. The controlling stake is in play, and the terms are not known

On July 2, 2026 Nexa disclosed that it had been advised of discussions between Votorantim S.A. and Boliden AB regarding a potential acquisition of Votorantim's ~64.68% controlling interest. As of the August 5, 2026 results release, the company stated that whether any agreements will be entered into, and their timing and terms, remain uncertain. No definitive agreement, tender offer or squeeze-out proposal has been filed with the SEC as of late August 2026, and 2026 guidance for production, smelting sales, costs and the ~$381 million capex plan was reaffirmed rather than withdrawn. S&P placed the BBB- issuer rating on CreditWatch negative on July 3, 2026, explicitly attributing the action to the potential change of control rather than to operating or financial performance, while Fitch and Moody's ratings were unchanged.

The bear case: what would have to be true for $13.50

The most pessimistic published target is $13.50, -12.3% from the current price. That is not a floor and not a forecast; it is roughly what one analyst thinks Nexa Resources is worth if the risks below bite instead of the drivers above.

The dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. Operational fragility is not theoretical either, since two fires occurred in a single quarter (Cajamarquilla's casting house in May, costing roughly ~7,000 tonnes of second-quarter refined zinc, and the Três Marias roasting-area cooling towers on May 19), and the Cajamarquilla root-cause and insurance loss adjustment were still open. Jurisdiction and permitting add a second layer: the Cerro Pasco Integration Project's estimated capex rose from ~$138 million to ~$180 million with the tailings pumping system slipping to ~1Q27 and shaft repowering deferred to ~2031, while the El Porvenir and Atacocha environmental study modifications remain under SENACE evaluation in Peru with approval expected in ~1Q27, and Brazilian real appreciation inflates US-dollar-reported costs at the Brazilian operations. On governance, VSA holds ~64.68% of a company incorporated in Luxembourg and listed only in New York, which leaves the ~35.32% public float (~46.8 million shares) with limited practical influence and no US-style proxy machinery, since Nexa reports as a foreign private issuer on Form 20-F and 6-K rather than 10-Q. Finally, the shares at ~$15.40 sit modestly above the ~$14.88 average target of the ~8 analysts covering the name, and any resolution of the Boliden discussions could reprice the stock in either direction independently of how the mines perform.

The bear case deserves the same attention as the bull case, and usually gets less. If you are holding NEXA already, the question is not whether these risks exist but whether any of them has moved from possible to actually happening in the reported numbers.

Where analysts land on NEXA

8 analysts cover NEXA, with an average target of $14.88 (-3.4% against $15.40) and a split of 0 buy, 7 hold, 1 sell. Bear in mind sell-side ratings skew positive across the whole market, so that split is not a balanced vote. The full target table, the recent rating actions by firm, and how the consensus has shifted are on the NEXA forecast and price target page.

How is NEXA valued? (as of August 2026)

Price
$15.40
Market cap
$2.04B
P/E (TTM)
7.37
Forward P/E
4.99
Price / book
1.69
Beta
0.93
52-week range
$4.70 to $16.89

Snapshot for NEXA as of August 2026, sourced from Yahoo Finance and may be delayed. Valuation figures move with price and earnings; verify the current numbers with your broker before deciding.

  • Revenue (TTM): ~$3.46 billion trailing twelve months, up ~24% versus ~$3.00 billion in fiscal 2025 and ~$2.77 billion in 2024; second-quarter 2026 net revenues ~$908 million (up ~28% year over year), first-half ~$1,796 million (up ~34%)
  • Earnings: Trailing net income ~$278 million and trailing EPS ~$2.10 against ~$133 million and ~$1.00 for full-year 2025; second-quarter net income ~$98 million (~$0.52 per share) versus ~$13 million (~$0.01) a year earlier, with adjusted EPS ~$0.64
  • Segment profitability: Second-quarter Adjusted EBITDA ~$286 million (up ~78%) at a ~31.5% margin: mining ~$220 million (up ~63%, ~41.9% margin) and smelting ~$66 million (up ~162%, ~11.4% margin); trailing twelve-month Adjusted EBITDA ~$1,055 million versus ~$665 million a year earlier
  • Cash generation and capital spending: Operating cash flow before working capital ~$286 million in the quarter, offset by a ~$365 million first-half working-capital and other outflow that left first-half free cash flow at ~negative $136 million; 2026 capex guidance reaffirmed at ~$381 million with ~$160 million spent in the first half, plus ~$86 million guided for exploration and project evaluation
  • Balance sheet: Gross debt ~$1,750 million and net debt ~$1,476 million for leverage of ~1.40x (from ~2.28x a year earlier); ~$387 million cash and investments plus a ~$320 million undrawn revolver for ~$707 million of liquidity, average debt maturity ~7.0 years at ~6.22%, only ~8% (~$133 million) maturing through end-2027; rated BBB- by S&P, on CreditWatch negative since July 3, 2026 on the potential change of control
  • Market pricing: ~$15.40 per share on August 21, 2026 for a market value near ~$2.04 billion across ~132.44 million shares, a 52-week range of ~$4.70 to ~$16.89; roughly ~7.4x trailing earnings, ~0.6x trailing sales and ~3.3x enterprise value to trailing Adjusted EBITDA; ~8 covering analysts carry an average target near ~$14.88, slightly below the market price

Figures are approximate, stamped to August 2026, and drawn from the second-quarter 2026 earnings release filed on Form 6-K on August 5, 2026, the fiscal 2025 Form 20-F, and market data as of the August 21, 2026 close, so live data is worth checking before acting on any of them. Nexa reports in US dollars under IFRS, so no currency translation is needed to read the headline numbers, though Brazilian real movements still flow through the Brazilian cost base. Two mechanical points shape the multiples above: the trailing earnings figure benefits from metal prices well above the company's own guidance assumptions (~$2,850 per tonne zinc, ~$42.0 per ounce silver), and only ~46.8 million of the ~132.44 million shares trade publicly, so the market capitalization is set by a float worth roughly ~$720 million.

How do you decide if NEXA is a buy?

Rather than asking whether NEXA is a buy in the abstract, it tends to help to answer four questions:

  • Thesis: do you believe the bull case above, and is it still true today?
  • Time horizon: a single stock can be volatile, so a longer horizon absorbs more of the swings.
  • Position sizing: a thesis can be right and the sizing still wrong; decide how much of your portfolio one name should be.
  • Overlap: check whether you already hold NEXA indirectly through an index or sector ETF before adding more.

What would change your mind on NEXA

Write the tripwires down before you need them. Deciding what would falsify your view is far harder once a position is moving against you.

  • Bull case breaks if: Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work stalls in the reported numbers rather than in the narrative around them.
  • Bear case breaks if: the dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter fails to materialise over several reporting periods while the drivers keep compounding.
  • Neither matters if: the position has grown large enough that being wrong would damage the whole portfolio. Sizing overrides the argument.

For the full picture, see the NEXA stock guide (what the company does, the ETFs that hold it, similar stocks, and the themes it fits). In Walnut you can ask its AI about NEXA against your real portfolio and see your actual exposure before deciding.

Investing in Nexa Resources with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how NEXA fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Is NEXA a good stock to buy right now?

+

That depends on which case you find more convincing, and both are on this page. The bull case rests on Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work, with revenue (ttm) at ~$3.46 billion trailing twelve months, up ~24% versus ~$3.00 billion in fiscal 2025 and ~$2.77 billion in 2024; second-quarter 2026 net revenues ~$908 million (up ~28% year over year), first-half ~$1,796 million (up ~34%). The bear case rests on the dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. Analysts covering it are spread from $13.50 to $16.00, which is itself a signal that this is genuinely contested. If you believe the thesis, the real questions become sizing and overlap rather than timing. Walnut is not an investment adviser and this is not a recommendation.

Should I sell NEXA?

+

Nobody can answer that for you, and the honest version of the question is narrower: has anything changed in the reason you bought it? The bear case on this page is the place to check. The dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. If that risk is what you were worried about and it is now playing out, that is a real signal. If the price simply fell while the thesis held, that is a different situation entirely. The most pessimistic published target is $13.50, -12.3% from the $15.40 price, which is one analyst's downside case rather than a floor. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What is the bull case for NEXA?

+

Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work. LME zinc averaged ~$3,466 per tonne (~$1.57 per pound) in the second quarter of 2026, up ~31% year over year, and ~$3,351 per tonne across the first half, up ~22%. The most optimistic analyst target on NEXA is $16.00, +3.9% from the $15.40 price. That figure is only reachable if this thesis works close to its best case.

What is the bear case for NEXA?

+

The dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. Operational fragility is not theoretical either, since two fires occurred in a single quarter (Cajamarquilla's casting house in May, costing roughly ~7,000 tonnes of second-quarter refined zinc, and the Três Marias roasting-area cooling towers on May 19), and the Cajamarquilla root-cause and insurance loss adjustment were still open. Jurisdiction and permitting add a second layer: the Cerro Pasco Integration Project's estimated capex rose from ~$138 million to ~$180 million with the tailings pumping system slipping to ~1Q27 and shaft repowering deferred to ~2031, while the El Porvenir and Atacocha environmental study modifications remain under SENACE evaluation in Peru with approval expected in ~1Q27, and Brazilian real appreciation inflates US-dollar-reported costs at the Brazilian operations. On governance, VSA holds ~64.68% of a company incorporated in Luxembourg and listed only in New York, which leaves the ~35.32% public float (~46.8 million shares) with limited practical influence and no US-style proxy machinery, since Nexa reports as a foreign private issuer on Form 20-F and 6-K rather than 10-Q. Finally, the shares at ~$15.40 sit modestly above the ~$14.88 average target of the ~8 analysts covering the name, and any resolution of the Boliden discussions could reprice the stock in either direction independently of how the mines perform. The most pessimistic published target is $13.50, -12.3% from the current price, which is roughly what the stock is worth if these risks bite rather than the drivers.

What does Nexa Resources do?

+

Nexa Resources is a Luxembourg-incorporated zinc miner and smelter running five mines and three smelters across Brazil and Peru, majority owned by Brazil's Votorantim.

What would have to change for NEXA to stop being worth holding?

+

Decide that in advance, because it is far harder to think clearly once a position is moving against you. The concrete tripwires here: the driver behind the bull case (Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work) stalling in the reported numbers rather than in the narrative, the risk above (the dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter) turning from a possibility into a reported fact, or the position growing large enough that a bad outcome would matter to your whole portfolio regardless of who is right.

What is Nexa Resources and what does it actually own?

+

Nexa Resources S.A. is an integrated zinc miner and smelter incorporated in Luxembourg with operations in Brazil and Peru. It owns five mines: Cerro Lindo, El Porvenir and Atacocha in Peru, plus Vazante and Aripuanã in Brazil. It also owns three smelters: Cajamarquilla near Lima, which is the only operating zinc smelter in Peru and was ranked fifth largest globally by volume in 2025, and Três Marias and Juiz de Fora in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Zinc was ~46.9% of mined metal production in 2025 on a zinc-equivalent basis, with copper, lead, silver and some gold produced as by-products. The Morro Agudo Complex was sold on April 30, 2024 and is no longer part of the portfolio.

Is Nexa Resources being acquired by Boliden?

+

Not as of late August 2026, and the distinction matters. On July 2, 2026 Nexa disclosed that it had been advised of discussions between its controlling shareholder Votorantim S.A. and Sweden's Boliden AB about a potential acquisition of Votorantim's stake. In its August 5, 2026 results release the company stated that whether any agreements will be entered into, and the timing and terms of any such agreements, remain uncertain. No definitive agreement, tender offer or going-private filing has appeared on Nexa's SEC docket, and management reaffirmed rather than withdrew 2026 guidance. What did change is the credit rating: S&P placed the BBB- issuer credit rating on CreditWatch with negative implications on July 3, 2026, saying explicitly that the action reflected the potential change of control and not operating or financial performance.

Who controls Nexa Resources, and how large is the free float?

+

Votorantim S.A., the Brazilian industrial group that has held the position since February 26, 2014, owned ~85,655,128 shares or ~64.68% of the ~132,438,611 shares outstanding as of March 26, 2026. The public holds the remaining ~46,783,483 shares, or ~35.32%. There is no dual-class structure, so the control follows directly from the size of the stake. Because Nexa is incorporated in Luxembourg and listed only on the NYSE, minority holders do not have the US proxy protections that apply to domestic issuers, and the company files annual reports on Form 20-F and interim reports on Form 6-K rather than 10-K and 10-Q. A float of under ~47 million shares also means the stock can move a long way on modest volume.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice, and gives no verdict on NEXA. Analyst targets referenced here come from a August 2026 pull of published third-party research and change constantly. Verify current figures with your broker before acting on them.

Related stocks

    Is NEXA a Buy or a Sell? The Bull and Bear Case (2026) - Walnut AI Investing App