What Is AMLP? Alerian MLP ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

AMLP is Alerian MLP ETF, an ETF that tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index at a 1.01% expense ratio. AMLP is structured differently from almost every other ETF on the market. Because it holds master limited partnerships above the level a regulated investment company is permitted, it is taxed as a corporation, which means the fund itself pays tax on its income before anything reaches shareholders. It is also concentrated: Sunoco at 13.6%, Energy Transfer at 13.3%, MPLX at 13.0%, Western Midstream at 13.0%, Plains All American at 12.9% and Enterprise Products at 12.8% account for about 79% between them. The fund charges 1.01%, holds $12.2B and distributes 7.76%.

Ticker
AMLP
Issuer
ALPS
Tracks
the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index
Expense ratio
1.01%
AUM
$12.2B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
7.76%
Inception
2010

AMLP is issued by ALPS and tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It charges a 1.01% expense ratio, holds approximately $12.2B in assets under management, yields about 7.76%, and launched in 2010.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

The fund is a corporation, and the arithmetic follows from that

US tax rules cap a regulated investment company at 25% of assets in master limited partnerships. A fund that wants to hold nothing but MLPs cannot qualify, so AMLP is organised as a C corporation instead. That single structural fact drives most of what is unusual about it. The fund accrues corporate income tax on its earnings, and that accrual sits on its balance sheet as a deferred tax liability that rises when the portfolio appreciates.

The practical effect is a layer of tax that a conventional ETF does not have. Investors sometimes describe this as a drag, but it is better understood as the price of the wrapper: the alternative structures either limit MLP exposure to a quarter of the portfolio or send you partnership tax paperwork directly.

That deferred tax accrual is not included in the 1.01% expense ratio. The expense ratio covers management and operating costs. The tax accrual is separate, appears in the fund's financial statements, and moves with the portfolio, so the total cost of ownership in a year of appreciation is higher than the headline fee suggests.

Six names, about four fifths of the fund

Sunoco, Energy Transfer, MPLX, Western Midstream, Plains All American and Enterprise Products each sit between 12.8% and 13.6%. Hess Midstream adds 8.9%, Cheniere Energy Partners 4.6%, USA Compression Partners 4.0% and Genesis Energy 2.9%. The top ten come to roughly 99% of the fund, which is close to the whole thing.

The clustering near 13% is not accidental. The investable universe of large, liquid energy MLPs is small, and index rules cap individual weights, so the biggest eligible partnerships all press up against the same ceiling. This is a structural feature of the asset class rather than a choice the fund made. Anyone buying midstream MLP exposure through any vehicle will end up owning broadly these companies.

What they do is largely fee-based: gathering, processing, storing and transporting hydrocarbons under contracts, some of them with minimum volume commitments. That is a different business from producing oil, and it is why midstream cash flows are less directly tied to the commodity price than an exploration company's. Volumes still matter, and volumes ultimately depend on drilling activity, so the link is real but indirect.

What a 7.76% distribution is made of

MLP distributions are typically substantial because the partnerships are structured to pass cash through rather than retain it. A meaningful portion of what AMLP pays out has historically been classified as return of capital rather than dividend income, which reduces your cost basis instead of being taxed in the year you receive it. That defers the tax rather than eliminating it: the reduced basis surfaces as a larger gain when you sell.

The presentational advantage of the fund is that shareholders receive a Form 1099 rather than the Schedule K-1 that direct MLP ownership generates. K-1s arrive late, complicate tax filing and can create state filing obligations in every state the partnership operates in. Removing that friction is a large part of why the fund exists at all.

The distribution rate is not a promise. It is the trailing rate on current payouts, and partnership distributions are set by each general partner and can be cut. A 7.76% headline should be read as a description of what has been paid, not as a fixed contractual coupon.

AMLP holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of AMLP
1SUNSunoco LP13.6%
2ETEnergy Transfer LP13.3%
3MPLXMPLX LP Partnership Units13.0%
4WESWestern Midstream Partners LP13.0%
5PAAPlains All American Pipeline LP12.9%
6EPDEnterprise Products Partners LP12.8%
7HESMHess Midstream LP Class A8.9%
8CQPCheniere Energy Partners LP4.6%
9USACUSA Compression Partners LP4.0%
10GELGenesis Energy LP2.9%

How do I invest in AMLP?

There are three common ways to get AMLP exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of AMLP directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so AMLP sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. AMLP trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is AMLP a good buy?

Whether AMLP is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is AMLP a buy?

The bottom line on AMLP

AMLP gives you the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index exposure in one ticker at a 1.01% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on AMLP

Whether AMLP is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is AMLP a buy?

AMLP yields 7.76% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see AMLP dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like AMLP? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how AMLP fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in AMLP with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how AMLP fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Will I receive a K-1 from AMLP?

+

No. The fund holds the partnerships and absorbs the K-1 treatment at the fund level, then issues shareholders a standard Form 1099. That is one of the main reasons the structure exists. Direct MLP ownership generates K-1s that often arrive after the usual filing deadline and can trigger filing requirements in multiple states where the partnership operates.

Why does AMLP pay corporate tax when other ETFs do not?

+

Because a regulated investment company cannot hold more than 25% of assets in master limited partnerships. A fund devoted entirely to MLPs fails that test, so AMLP is organised as a C corporation and is taxed on its income like any other company. The tax accrues at the fund level and appears as a deferred tax liability on its balance sheet.

What does the 1.01% expense ratio cover, and what does it leave out?

+

It covers management, administration and operating costs. It does not include the corporate income tax the fund accrues on its earnings, which is a separate line in the financial statements and grows as the portfolio appreciates. In a year of gains, the total economic cost of holding the fund is therefore higher than 1.01% on its own implies.

Why are the top holdings all around 13%?

+

The pool of large, liquid energy MLPs is small, and index construction caps how much any one can represent. The biggest eligible partnerships all sit at that cap, which produces the flat block near 13%. The consequence is concentration: six names are roughly 79% of the fund, so a problem at any one of them is material rather than diversified away.

Is the 7.76% payout a dividend?

+

Not entirely. A large share of MLP distributions has historically been classified as return of capital, which is not taxed as income in the year received. Instead it lowers your cost basis, which increases the taxable gain when you eventually sell. The economics are a tax deferral rather than tax-free income, and the exact split is reported on your 1099 each year.

Does AMLP move with the price of oil?

+

Less directly than a producer would. Midstream partnerships mostly earn fees for gathering, processing, storing and transporting hydrocarbons, often under contracts with volume commitments. Their revenue depends more on throughput than on the spot price. However, sustained low prices reduce drilling, which eventually reduces volumes, so the sector is correlated with energy prices even though the mechanism is indirect.

Can AMLP be held in an IRA?

+

The fund's corporate structure is specifically designed to make MLP exposure straightforward inside retirement accounts, because it avoids the unrelated business taxable income complications that direct partnership ownership can create. The trade-off is the fund-level corporate tax, which applies regardless of the account type. Whether that combination suits a given account is worth discussing with a tax professional.

What alternatives exist if the fund-level tax matters?

+

Some competing products cap MLP holdings at 25% and fill the rest with midstream corporations, which keeps regulated investment company status and avoids the fund-level tax, at the cost of a different portfolio. Others hold midstream C corporations only. Direct ownership of individual partnerships avoids the fund tax entirely but brings K-1 filings back. Each route trades one complication for another.

How do I compare AMLP to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. AMLP's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against ALPS's fund page or your broker before investing.