What Is BAI? iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

BAI is iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.55% expense ratio. BAI is an actively managed technology fund from iShares built around artificial intelligence, launched in 2024 and already holding $15.7B. It charges 0.55%, high against index technology funds and ordinary for an active mandate. The portfolio is not what the name suggests to most buyers: its biggest holdings are SK Hynix at 8.0% and Micron at 6.6%, with Lam Research, SanDisk, Western Digital and Intel also inside the top ten. NVIDIA is the seventh position at 3.8%. Technology accounts for 91% of the fund and the top ten holdings are 46.9% of it.

Ticker
BAI
Issuer
iShares
Tracks
Actively managed, no tracked index
Expense ratio
0.55%
AUM
$15.7B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
1.13%
Inception
2024

BAI is issued by iShares and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.55% expense ratio, holds approximately $15.7B in assets under management, yields about 1.13%, and launched in 2024.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

This is a memory and equipment fund

Add up the memory and storage names and the character of the portfolio becomes clear. SK Hynix at 8.0%, Micron at 6.6%, SanDisk at 3.3% and Western Digital at 3.2% come to 21.1% of the fund in companies that make chips or drives that store data. Add Lam Research at 5.2%, which makes the etch and deposition tools those chips are built on, and Taiwan Semiconductor at 4.5%, which fabricates for everyone. NVIDIA, the company most people associate with the phrase artificial intelligence, sits at 3.8%, less than half the weight of SK Hynix.

There is a coherent thesis behind that. Training and serving large models consumes high-bandwidth memory in quantities that were not planned for, and memory is a supply-constrained, capital-intensive business with only a handful of credible producers and real pricing leverage when supply is tight. A manager who believes the bottleneck in AI infrastructure sits at memory and manufacturing equipment rather than at the processor designers would build something close to this portfolio. Whether that view is right is exactly the question a buyer is taking a position on.

It also means the fund carries a risk profile most AI buyers are not expecting. Memory is the most cyclical corner of semiconductors, with a long history of violent boom and bust as capacity arrives late and all at once. A fund weighted this way tracks the memory pricing cycle closely. That cycle has historically had little to do with the pace of software adoption.

Active, expensive and young

There is no index here. The manager selects holdings, and the portfolio can look entirely different in a year. That flexibility is the argument for the 0.55% fee, which is several times what a broad technology index fund costs and represents a real hurdle: the manager must add that much value every year simply to match a cheaper passive alternative. It is a defensible fee for a genuinely differentiated portfolio, and this one is differentiated, but the arithmetic does not go away.

The 2024 launch matters more than it looks. The fund has not existed through a full semiconductor cycle, let alone a broad technology drawdown. Any judgement about how the strategy behaves in stress has to be made from the composition rather than from its record, because the record is too short to carry weight. Reaching $15.7B in that time is a comment on demand for AI-labelled products rather than on the strategy itself.

One consequence of active management deserves flagging. Because holdings turn over at the manager's discretion, the exposure you researched is not necessarily the exposure you own six months later. That is the point of paying for active management, but it does mean the position needs periodic checking rather than the set-and-forget treatment an index fund allows.

How it overlaps with what you already own

The overlap question is unusually important for this fund. Anyone holding a total US market fund or an S&P 500 fund already owns NVIDIA, Broadcom, AMD, Intel and Micron at meaningful weights, because those companies have grown into some of the largest listed businesses in the world. Adding BAI does not introduce new companies so much as it multiplies the exposure to a handful of names already sitting near the top of the core portfolio.

What it does add that a US index fund does not is SK Hynix, the Korean memory maker at the top of the fund, and direct exposure to Taiwan Semiconductor at 4.5%. Those are foreign-listed businesses that a domestic index fund misses entirely. If the reason for buying is access to the parts of the AI supply chain that sit outside the United States, that is the honest version of the argument.

Sector data confirms there is nothing else in here. Technology is 91%, with token weights in industrials at 5%, communication services at 3% and consumer discretionary at 2%. This is a concentrated sector bet, and it should be sized as one rather than treated as a diversified growth holding.

BAI holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of BAI
1SK Hynix Inc8.0%
2MUMicron Technology Inc6.6%
3LRCXLam Research Corp5.2%
4AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc5.1%
5TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd ADR4.5%
6AVGOBroadcom Inc3.9%
7NVDANVIDIA Corp3.8%
8SNDKSanDisk Corp Ordinary Shares3.3%
9INTCIntel Corp3.3%
10WDCWestern Digital Corp3.2%

How do I invest in BAI?

There are three common ways to get BAI exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of BAI directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so BAI sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. BAI trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is BAI a good buy?

Whether BAI is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is BAI a buy?

The bottom line on BAI

BAI gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.55% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on BAI

Whether BAI is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is BAI a buy?

BAI yields 1.13% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see BAI dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like BAI? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how BAI fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in BAI with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BAI fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why is NVIDIA only the seventh holding?

+

Because the manager is expressing a view about where the constraint in AI infrastructure lies. NVIDIA sits at 3.8% while SK Hynix is at 8.0% and Micron at 6.6%. The implied argument is that memory supply, and the equipment used to make it, is scarcer than processor design and holds more pricing leverage. Buyers expecting an NVIDIA-led portfolio because of the fund's name will find something quite different.

How concentrated is BAI?

+

The top ten holdings account for 46.9% of the fund, so roughly half of it sits in ten companies. Technology is 91% of the sector exposure. Within that top ten, four names are memory and storage businesses whose fortunes move together with the same commodity pricing cycle, which means the effective concentration is higher than a simple count of positions would suggest.

What does the 0.55% expense ratio buy?

+

A manager making the selection decisions rather than an index. That fee is several times what a passive technology fund charges and is a permanent annual drag the strategy has to overcome. The case for paying it rests on the portfolio being materially different from anything indexed, which this one is: no mainstream technology index would put a Korean memory maker in the top slot.

Is BAI a semiconductor fund in disguise?

+

Close to it. Nine of the ten largest positions design, manufacture or store data on chips, or build the tools used to make them. A dedicated semiconductor ETF would hold a similar cast, though usually cap-weighted toward the largest designers rather than tilted toward memory. The distinction BAI draws is within semiconductors, not between chips and software.

Does it include foreign companies?

+

Yes, and that is one of the more useful things it does. SK Hynix, the largest position at 8.0%, is listed in Korea, and Taiwan Semiconductor at 4.5% is Taiwanese. A US index fund holds neither. For an investor whose portfolio is entirely domestic, this is genuine incremental exposure rather than a repackaging of names already owned.

What is the biggest risk here?

+

The memory cycle. Memory chips are close to a commodity, produced by a small number of manufacturers who all expand capacity when prices are high, which historically ends with oversupply and sharp price falls. A portfolio with a fifth of its weight in memory and storage names inherits that cycle. It is a different risk from the one implied by a bet on AI adoption, and it can move independently of it.

How long has BAI existed?

+

Since 2024, which is short enough that it has no record through a semiconductor downturn or a broad technology correction. It has gathered $15.7B in that time. Asset growth of that speed reflects appetite for AI-themed products rather than any demonstrated result, and any assessment of the fund has to rest on what it holds rather than on how it has performed.

How should the overlap with a core index fund be handled?

+

Check it before sizing the position. Broadcom, NVIDIA, AMD, Micron and Intel already carry meaningful weight in a US total market or S&P 500 fund. Buying BAI on top of one stacks additional exposure onto companies you own already. The genuinely additive parts are the foreign-listed positions, principally SK Hynix and Taiwan Semiconductor.

How do I compare BAI to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. BAI's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against iShares's fund page or your broker before investing.