What Is BLCR? iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

BLCR is iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.36% expense ratio. BLCR is BlackRock's actively managed large-cap core ETF, launched in 2023, holding $6.4B at a 0.36% fee. Its top ten positions leave out Apple entirely and include names no cap-weighted index would hold at that size: Cardinal Health at 3.6%, ATI at 3.6%, Micron at 4.4% and Intel at 3.5%. Amazon at 6.3% sits above Microsoft at 3.9%. The ten largest holdings account for 44.2% of the fund, technology is 37% and industrials 14%. The trailing yield is 0.28%, low even for a growth-tilted portfolio.

Ticker
BLCR
Issuer
iShares
Tracks
Actively managed, no tracked index
Expense ratio
0.36%
AUM
$6.4B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.28%
Inception
2023

BLCR is issued by iShares and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.36% expense ratio, holds approximately $6.4B in assets under management, yields about 0.28%, and launched in 2023.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

The absences say as much as the holdings

Approximate weights as of August 2026; refresh quarterly from iShares's fund page. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of BLCR
1NVDANVIDIA Corp6.5%
2AMZNAmazon.com Inc6.3%
3GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A4.8%
4MUMicron Technology Inc4.4%
5METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A4.0%
6MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.9%
7VVisa Inc Class A3.6%
8CAHCardinal Health Inc3.6%
9ATIATI Inc3.6%
10INTCIntel Corp3.5%

Apple does not appear in the ten largest positions of a US large-cap core fund. That is an unusual thing to be able to write. In a cap-weighted index, Apple is one of the two or three biggest holdings by definition, so its absence from this list is a decision. Microsoft is present but at 3.9%, below Amazon at 6.3% and NVIDIA at 6.5%, and below where index weight would place it.

The additions are equally telling. ATI, a specialty metals company supplying the aerospace and defence industry, is held at 3.6%. Cardinal Health, a pharmaceutical distributor, is at the same weight. Micron at 4.4% and Intel at 3.5% are both semiconductor manufacturers held far above their index weights. These are the positions where the manager is taking real risk relative to a benchmark, and they explain the 14% industrials weighting, which sits well above the S&P 500's.

Taken together, the top ten is 44.2% of the fund. That is concentrated for a core equity holding, and the concentration is not simply an echo of the index's own top-heaviness. It reflects deliberate position sizing in mid-sized companies alongside the megacaps.

What active management means for the buyer

There is no index behind this fund, so the composition described here is a snapshot rather than a rule. A manager can rotate out of ATI or back into Apple at any time. That is the product being purchased, and it changes how the position should be monitored: an index fund can be checked once a year, while an active fund's exposures need periodic review because the reason you bought it may no longer be in the portfolio.

The 0.36% fee sits at the low end for active management and at the high end relative to index funds covering the same universe, which cost a small fraction of it. That gap is a hurdle the manager has to clear annually. In US large caps specifically, that hurdle has historically been difficult to clear consistently, because the segment is heavily researched and information advantages are hard to sustain.

The 2023 launch means there is not enough history to draw conclusions from results. What can be assessed is whether the portfolio is genuinely differentiated, and on that measure it clearly is. Absent Apple, overweight Micron and Intel, holding a specialty metals company at 3.6%, this is not a closet index fund, which at least means the fee is buying something real.

Income, sector shape and portfolio fit

The 0.28% yield is strikingly low for a large blend fund. It follows from the composition: NVIDIA, Amazon, Alphabet and Meta pay little or nothing relative to their size, and several of the other large positions are in companies reinvesting heavily. An investor drawing income from their portfolio would need to source it elsewhere entirely.

The sector shape is technology at 37%, industrials at 14%, communication services at 13%, consumer discretionary at 10% and financials at 10%. The technology figure is roughly in line with the broad US market, but the industrials weight is a genuine overweight and the financials weight is on the lighter side. Those tilts, more than the individual stock picks, are likely to drive much of the divergence from a benchmark.

As a portfolio component, it works as a core US equity position for someone who wants active management, or as a satellite beside an index fund for someone who wants a measured amount of it. What does not work well is holding it alongside a large-cap index fund in similar size, which blends the active bets back toward index weights while still paying the active fee.

How do I invest in BLCR?

There are three common ways to get BLCR exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of BLCR directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so BLCR sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. BLCR trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is BLCR a good buy?

Whether BLCR is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is BLCR a buy?

The bottom line on BLCR

BLCR gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.36% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on BLCR

Whether BLCR is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is BLCR a buy?

BLCR yields 0.28% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see BLCR dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like BLCR? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how BLCR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in BLCR with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BLCR fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why is Apple missing from the top holdings?

+

Because the fund is actively managed and the manager has chosen not to hold it at index weight. In a cap-weighted portfolio Apple would automatically be among the largest positions. Leaving it out of the top ten is one of the largest active decisions a US large-cap manager can make, and it will drive a meaningful part of the fund's divergence from a benchmark in either direction.

What is ATI doing in a large-cap core fund?

+

ATI makes specialty metals and alloys used in aerospace, defence and energy applications. It is held at 3.6%, a weight far above anything a cap-weighted index would assign to a company of its size. Positions like this are where an active manager is genuinely taking risk relative to a benchmark, and they explain why the fund's industrials weighting reaches 14%.

How concentrated is BLCR?

+

The ten largest positions are 44.2% of the fund, and technology accounts for 37% of the sector exposure. That is concentrated for a fund described as large-cap core. It is worth noting that four of those top ten, NVIDIA, Micron, Intel and to a degree Amazon through its infrastructure spending, are exposed to the same semiconductor and data centre cycle.

Is 0.36% a reasonable fee?

+

It is inexpensive for active management and expensive against index funds covering the same universe. The annual gap is a hurdle the manager must clear before adding value. The relevant test is whether the portfolio differs enough from an index to have a chance of doing so, and this one does: the absent Apple position and the overweights in Micron, Intel and ATI are real departures.

Why is the yield only 0.28%?

+

The largest holdings pay little. NVIDIA, Amazon, Alphabet and Meta distribute nothing or almost nothing relative to their market values, and several other large positions are in companies reinvesting heavily in capacity. Even by the standards of growth-tilted large-cap funds this is low, so anyone relying on portfolio income would need to source it from other holdings entirely.

Does BLCR track an index?

+

No. It is actively managed by BlackRock with no benchmark to replicate, so holdings and weights change at the manager's discretion rather than on an index schedule. The practical consequence is that the portfolio described today may look different in six months. Active positions need periodic review in a way index positions do not.

How long has the fund existed?

+

Since 2023, which is too short a period to evaluate a manager's results with any confidence. In that time it has gathered $6.4B. Assessment therefore has to rest on the portfolio itself, how far it departs from a benchmark, how concentrated it is, and whether the sector tilts are ones you want, rather than on performance history.

Can it be held alongside an S&P 500 fund?

+

It can, but the two dilute each other. An index fund holds Apple at full weight while this one holds little, and holds Micron and Intel at small weights while this one holds them heavily. Combining them in similar size pulls the blended portfolio back toward the index while still paying the active fee on half of it.

What is BLCR's expense ratio?

+

BLCR has an expense ratio of 0.36% per year as of August 2026, charged by iShares and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $36 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.

How do I compare BLCR to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. BLCR's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against iShares's fund page or your broker before investing.