GLD vs SLV: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?

Last updated mid-2026

Short answer

GLD (LBMA Gold Price (physical gold)) and SLV (LBMA Silver Price (physical silver)) are genuinely different exposures, not two versions of the same thing. This is a role-and-mix decision (how much of each), not an either/or.

The tie-breaker: role, income, and risk

What each is for. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price (physical gold) and SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price (physical silver). These play different roles in a portfolio, so the useful question is what job you are hiring each for, not which has the better recent chart.

Income. GLD yields about 0% (no dividend) and SLV about 0% (no dividend) (mid-2026). The yields are close.

Cost. 0.40% vs 0.50% ($40 vs $50 on $10,000 a year).

What each fund tracks: index and methodology

GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price (physical gold), and SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price (physical silver). Because they follow different benchmarks, the two funds screen and weight their holdings differently, and that is what produces any gap in exposure, concentration, and return between them.

On construction, GLD is market-cap-weighted and SLV is market-cap-weighted. They share a weighting approach, so any difference comes from the underlying index rather than the method.

So these two are answering different questions about your portfolio, which is why the choice is usually how much of each to hold rather than one instead of the other.

GLD vs SLV: cost, size, and yield side by side

 GLDSLV
Expense ratio0.40%0.50%
Fee per $10,000 / year$40$50
Assets under management~$150.4 billion~$36.8 billion
Dividend yield0% (no dividend)0% (no dividend)
InceptionNovember 2004April 2006

GLD is the cheaper fund at 0.40% versus 0.50%, a gap of about $10 a year on a $10,000 holding. Because these funds hold different things, the cheaper fee is only one input; the exposure difference usually matters more than the cost gap.

On scale, GLD holds about ~$150.4 billion and SLV about ~$36.8 billion. Larger funds generally trade at tighter bid-ask spreads and carry deeper options markets, which matters if you trade actively or in size; for buy-and-hold investors it rarely changes the outcome. Both funds yield about the same (0% (no dividend) versus 0% (no dividend)).

Which fund suits which investor

These are complements, not rivals, so most investors hold both in different roles rather than choosing one. The broader or steadier fund typically works as a larger core position, while the narrower or higher-income fund suits a smaller satellite role for investors who specifically want that income or exposure. An income-focused or drawdown-sensitive investor weights toward the higher-yield side; a growth-focused, long-horizon investor weights toward the broader one.

These are descriptive profiles, not recommendations. What fits you depends on your goals, horizon, and what you already own. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Before you buy: do you already own this?

The overlap that decides most ETF purchases is not between GLD and SLV, it is with what you already hold. ETF redundancy is invisible without looking through to the underlying holdings: you can already own most of GLD inside a broad fund like an S&P 500 or total-market ETF and not realize it.

This is the part a generic comparison cannot answer, because it depends on your account. Connect your brokerage and Walnut looks through your funds to show your real, combined exposure, flags how much of GLD or SLV you already own elsewhere, and tells you whether adding either just buys the same companies twice, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What is GLD?

Each share represents a claim on physical gold held in vaults, so the price tracks spot gold rather than any company or dividend. It is used as an inflation and crisis hedge and a diversifier against stocks. It pays no income and charges a 0.40% fee.

Full GLD guide

What is SLV?

Holds physical silver bullion, so shares track the spot silver price. Silver is both a precious metal and an industrial input (solar, electronics), which makes it more volatile than gold and more tied to the economic cycle. It pays no income and charges a 0.50% fee.

Full SLV guide

GLD or SLV: which should you pick?

These are complements, not rivals. Most investors hold the broader or lower-risk fund as a larger core and use the narrower or higher-yield one as a smaller satellite sized to the role they want it to play, rather than picking one and dropping the other. Decide the split deliberately.

For the full detail, see the GLD and SLV guides.

GLD vs SLV: the full fund facts

 GLDSLV
FundSPDR Gold SharesiShares Silver Trust
TracksLBMA Gold Price (physical gold)LBMA Silver Price (physical silver)
Expense ratio0.40%0.50%
Dividend yield0% (no dividend)0% (no dividend)
AUM~$150.4 billion~$36.8 billion
Top holdingn/an/a
IssuerState Street SPDRiShares

Approximate as of mid-2026; verify with each issuer.

State Street SPDR launched the first US ETF and runs many sector funds. iShares (BlackRock) is the largest ETF issuer, with deep liquidity across its range.

The bottom line: GLD vs SLV

GLD and SLV are different exposures, so the question is how much of each, not which is better. Either way, the decisive check is overlap with your real portfolio. Walnut can show that before you buy. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how GLD or SLV fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in GLD with AI

Walnut connects your real brokerage so you can see how GLD and SLV overlap with what you already own, analyze either by chatting through Claude or ChatGPT, and place any trade yourself.

FAQ

What is the difference between GLD and SLV?

+

GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price (physical gold) (0.40%); SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price (physical silver) (0.50%). They give you genuinely different exposure, so the choice is how much of each to hold, not which is better.

Do GLD and SLV hold the same stocks?

+

Their holdings are different in kind (for example bonds or commodities versus stocks), so they are complementary rather than redundant.

Is GLD or SLV cheaper?

+

GLD charges 0.40% and SLV charges 0.50% as of mid-2026, so GLD keeps a little more of your return each year. On a $10,000 holding that is about $40 vs $50 a year.

Should you own both GLD and SLV?

+

It can make sense if you want both roles, but check the overlap first so you are not paying two fees for one bet. Walnut can show the real overlap, and the overlap with what you already own, before you buy.

Which has a higher dividend yield, GLD or SLV?

+

GLD yields about 0% (no dividend) and SLV about 0% (no dividend) (mid-2026, approximate). They are close. For most long-term investors total return and cost matter more than the headline yield.

How much do GLD and SLV overlap?

+

GLD and SLV hold different kinds of assets, so their overlap is minimal and they are complementary rather than redundant.

GLD vs SLV: which is better?

+

They are different exposures, so "better" is the wrong frame: the useful question is how much of each fits your portfolio, not which one to pick. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Which is better for a long-term investor, GLD or SLV?

+

Long-term investors often hold the broader, steadier fund as a core and size the narrower or higher-yield one to the role they want it to play, rather than choosing only one. Figures are approximate as of mid-2026.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. ETF figures are approximations stamped to mid-2026; verify current data with each issuer before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation.

    GLD vs SLV: Which ETF Is Better in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App