JEPQ vs JEPI: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?
Short answer
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) tracks Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay) at 0.35%; JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) tracks Actively managed (no index) at ~0.35%. They give you different exposure, so pick by what you want to own: JEPQ for Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay), JEPI for Actively managed (no index). Neither is universally better.
JEPQ vs JEPI at a glance
| JEPQ | JEPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF |
| Tracks | Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay) | Actively managed (no index) |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | ~0.35% |
| Dividend yield | ~10.11% | ~7-9% (variable) |
| AUM | ~$39.6 billion | ~$40 billion |
| Top holding | NVDA | MSFT |
| Issuer | JPMorgan | JPMorgan Asset Management |
Approximate as of mid-2026; verify with each issuer.
What the differences actually mean
Cost. JEPQ charges 0.35% a year and JEPI charges ~0.35%. On a $10,000 holding that is roughly $35 versus $35 a year. The gap looks tiny, but JEPI keeps a little more of your return every year, and over two or three decades of compounding that difference grows into real money.
Dividend yield. JEPQ yields about ~10.11% and JEPI about ~7-9% (variable). JEPI pays more income today, which matters if you are drawing from the portfolio. If you are reinvesting for growth, total return (price plus dividends) matters more than the headline yield.
Size and liquidity. JEPQ holds about ~$39.6 billion versus JEPI's ~$40 billion. Both are large enough to trade with tight bid-ask spreads, so for a buy-and-hold investor the size gap rarely changes anything in practice; it mostly tells you how widely each fund is already held.
Concentration. JEPQ's largest position is NVDA at about 7.31%, and JEPI's is MSFT at ~2%. They share top names (MSFT, AMZN, NVDA, META), so owning both is less diversification than it looks: you are doubling down on the same companies.
Issuer. JEPQ is run by JPMorgan and JEPI by JPMorgan Asset Management. JPMorgan is known for active and options-overlay ETFs. JPMorgan is known for active and options-overlay ETFs.
Which fits which investor
JEPQ (Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay)) and JEPI (Actively managed (no index)) give you genuinely different exposure, so this is a choice of what you want to own, not just which is cheaper. A broad-market fund suits a core, long-horizon holding you can size large and forget. A narrower, sector, or growth-tilted fund adds concentration and usually more volatility, which suits a longer time horizon and a higher risk tolerance, and is better used as a satellite position than as your whole portfolio. JEPI's higher yield leans more toward income and steadier names; the other tilts more toward growth and price appreciation.
What is JEPQ?
Holds an actively selected slice of Nasdaq-100 stocks and sells call options against them, turning volatility into a high monthly distribution. The trade-off is capped upside in strong rallies. The headline yield is large but variable, and the fee is 0.35%.
What is JEPI?
An actively managed ETF that combines a defensive US large-cap stock portfolio with an options-writing overlay (via equity-linked notes) to generate monthly income. The distribution yield is high but variable, tied to options premiums and market volatility, and the strategy caps upside in exchange for income and lower volatility. Verify current figures on the issuer's site.
JEPQ or JEPI: which should you pick?
- Pick JEPQ if you want Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay) exposure at 0.35%.
- Pick JEPI if you want Actively managed (no index) exposure at ~0.35%.
- Overlap: they share top holdings (MSFT, AMZN, NVDA, META), so owning both adds less diversification than it appears.
- Cost: 0.35% vs ~0.35%, a small but compounding difference.
The bottom line: JEPQ vs JEPI
JEPQ (Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay)) and JEPI (Actively managed (no index)) give you different exposure, so pick by what you want to own, not by which is "better". They overlap heavily, so owning both mostly doubles a fee. Walnut can show the overlap against your real portfolio before you decide.
Both funds lean heavily on NVDA, so understanding that single company explains a lot of what drives either ETF.
Build a portfolio around JEPQ with Walnut
Walnut connects your real brokerage so you can see how JEPQ and JEPI overlap with what you already own, analyze either by chatting through Claude or ChatGPT, and place any trade yourself.
FAQ
What is the difference between JEPQ and JEPI?
+
JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 (active equity + options overlay) (0.35% expense ratio); JEPI tracks Actively managed (no index) (~0.35%). They track different indexes, so they give you different exposure.
Is JEPQ or JEPI cheaper?
+
JEPQ charges 0.35% and JEPI charges ~0.35% as of mid-2026. Over decades the cheaper fund keeps more of your return, but verify current figures with each issuer.
Do JEPQ and JEPI hold the same stocks?
+
They overlap meaningfully: shared top holdings include MSFT, AMZN, NVDA, META. Owning both can mean less diversification than it looks.
Which has a higher dividend yield, JEPQ or JEPI?
+
JEPQ yields about ~10.11% and JEPI about ~7-9% (variable) (mid-2026, approximate). If income matters, that gap is one input, but total return and cost matter more for most long-term investors.
Should you own both JEPQ and JEPI?
+
Often not, because they overlap heavily (MSFT, AMZN, NVDA, META and more), so holding both adds cost without much extra diversification. Walnut can show the overlap against your real portfolio.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. ETF figures are approximations stamped to mid-2026; verify current data with each issuer before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation.