What Is DFAI? Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

DFAI is Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.18% expense ratio. DFAI is Dimensional's broad developed-market equity fund outside the United States, run systematically rather than against a published index, and priced at 0.18%. The portfolio is deliberately diffuse: ASML is the largest position at 2.0%, and nothing else reaches 1.2%. The sector shape is the clearest signal of how different non-US developed markets are from the US, with financials at 23% and industrials at 19% against technology at just 11%. The distribution yield is 2.35%. The ETF launched in 2020, so its own record is short.

Ticker
DFAI
Issuer
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Tracks
Actively managed, no tracked index
Expense ratio
0.18%
AUM
$16.8B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
2.35%
Inception
2020

DFAI is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.18% expense ratio, holds approximately $16.8B in assets under management, yields about 2.35%, and launched in 2020.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

No index means no reconstitution calendar

Dimensional does not track a benchmark here. The fund defines an eligible universe of developed non-US companies and weights it with tilts toward smaller, cheaper and more profitable businesses, applied as adjustments to market weights rather than as a screen that throws most of the market away. That is why the holdings still look like the developed world: HSBC, Roche, AstraZeneca, Shell, Nestle, Tokyo Electron, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Novartis all appear near the top, at weights between 0.7% and 1.1%.

The absence of an index has a practical consequence that is easy to overlook. An index fund must own what the index owns on the day the index says so, which forces trading at moments when everyone else is trading the same names. A systematic manager without that constraint can let a stock drift, wait for liquidity, and avoid paying for immediacy. Whether that flexibility earns its keep is not something a holdings list can settle, but it is the actual design difference.

There is a second effect, and it shows up in cost rather than in holdings. An index fund is obliged to buy what is being added and sell what is being removed on announced dates, and the rest of the market knows it. A manager working from its own rules can supply liquidity instead of demanding it, taking the other side when someone else needs to trade urgently. That advantage is measured in basis points rather than percentage points, and it accumulates quietly rather than appearing in any single year.

This is not the US market with different addresses

Financials at 23% and industrials at 19% make up more than four tenths of the fund between them. Technology is 11%, consumer discretionary 9% and healthcare 9%. An investor moving from a US core fund into this one is not simply relocating the same businesses. Developed markets outside the US are structurally heavier in banks, insurers, capital goods, energy and consumer staples, and much lighter in software and platform companies.

The top holdings show that composition directly. One semiconductor equipment maker, ASML, leads at 2.0%, followed by Tokyo Electron at 0.8%, so the technology weight that does exist leans toward manufacturing equipment rather than software. Beneath them sit European pharmaceutical companies, a large UK bank, an oil major, a Swiss food company and a Japanese bank. The 2.35% distribution yield follows from that mix, since these are industries with longer payout traditions than their US equivalents.

Currency is the other structural difference. The underlying shares are priced in yen, euros, pounds and Swiss francs while the fund reports in dollars. Check the fund documents for whether that exposure is hedged, because the answer changes the year-to-year experience more than most investors expect from a broadly diversified equity fund.

Cost, record and fit

The 0.18% fee sits between a plain cap-weighted developed-market index fund and a conventional active manager. That is the trade being offered: systematic tilts at close to index pricing, without a stock picker making individual judgments. Whether that premium over a pure index tracker is worth paying depends entirely on whether an investor wants the size, value and profitability tilts at all.

The 2020 launch means the ETF has not yet traded through a full cycle in this wrapper, and anyone evaluating it on live results alone is working with a short sample. The fund is a poor match for someone who wants a benchmark-matching international allocation, since the tilts guarantee it will diverge from cap-weighted indexes in both directions, or for someone who wants a concentrated position in a handful of international names, given that the largest is 2.0%.

DFAI holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of DFAI
1ASMLASML Holding NV ADR2.0%
2HSBC Holdings PLC1.1%
3Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new1.0%
4AstraZeneca PLC0.9%
5Shell PLC0.9%
6Nestle SA0.9%
7Tokyo Electron Ltd0.8%
8Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc0.7%
9NVSNovartis AG ADR0.7%

How do I invest in DFAI?

There are three common ways to get DFAI exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of DFAI directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so DFAI sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. DFAI trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is DFAI a good buy?

Whether DFAI is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFAI a buy?

The bottom line on DFAI

DFAI gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.18% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on DFAI

Whether DFAI is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFAI a buy?

DFAI yields 2.35% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see DFAI dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like DFAI? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how DFAI fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in DFAI with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DFAI fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why does DFAI not track an index?

+

Dimensional builds portfolios from its own eligibility and weighting rules rather than licensing a benchmark. The practical effect is freedom over timing: the fund is never obliged to trade a specific name on a specific date because an index provider scheduled it. The cost is that performance cannot be neatly attributed to tracking error against a familiar reference index.

What countries and companies does it hold?

+

The disclosed largest positions are developed-market companies from Europe and Japan: ASML at 2.0%, HSBC at 1.1%, Roche at 1.0%, AstraZeneca and Shell and Nestle at 0.9% each, Tokyo Electron at 0.8%, then Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Novartis at 0.7%. The eligible universe is defined in the fund documents rather than by an index provider.

Why is technology only 11% here?

+

Because that is what developed markets outside the United States look like. Banks, insurers, industrial manufacturers, energy companies and consumer staples dominate those markets, with financials at 23% and industrials at 19% in this fund. The very large software and platform companies are overwhelmingly US-listed, so an international fund simply does not have them to own.

Is 0.18% expensive for a fund without an index?

+

It is above a plain cap-weighted developed-market tracker and well below traditional active management. The fee buys systematic tilts toward smaller, cheaper and more profitable companies plus discretion over trade timing. Whether that is worth the difference depends on whether an investor wants those tilts, since without them the cheaper tracker does the same core job.

What does DFAI yield and why is it higher than a US fund?

+

The distribution yield is 2.35%. Developed markets outside the US pay out a larger share of earnings than US companies do, partly by convention and partly because of sector composition: banks, energy majors, pharmaceutical companies and consumer staples all have long payout traditions. The yield is a by-product of that composition, not the result of a dividend screen.

How concentrated is the fund?

+

Barely at all. ASML at 2.0% is the only position above 1.2%, and the next eight run from 1.1% down to 0.7%. That means no single company decision drives results. Sector and country weights, not individual holdings, are the meaningful levers, which is normal for a fund designed as a broad core allocation.

Does DFAI overlap with a total world fund?

+

Substantially. A total world fund already contains developed markets outside the US, so holding both duplicates that exposure and dilutes the tilts DFAI applies. Investors generally use a fund like this to control the international slice deliberately, sizing it against separate US and emerging-market holdings rather than layering it on top of an all-in-one product.

Who is DFAI the wrong tool for?

+

Anyone who needs to match a cap-weighted international benchmark closely, because the tilts guarantee periods of divergence in both directions. Anyone wanting concentrated exposure to specific international companies, given the largest position is 2.0%. And anyone assessing funds on live track record alone, since this ETF only launched in 2020.

What is DFAI's expense ratio?

+

DFAI has an expense ratio of 0.18% per year as of August 2026, charged by Dimensional Fund Advisors and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $18 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.

How do I compare DFAI to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. DFAI's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Dimensional Fund Advisors's fund page or your broker before investing.