What Is DFAU? Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

DFAU is Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.12% expense ratio. DFAU is Dimensional's broad US equity fund, run systematically rather than against an index, with tilts toward smaller, cheaper and more profitable companies. What the holdings show is how gentle those tilts are: NVIDIA is 6.6% of the fund, Apple 5.9%, Microsoft 4.1%, and technology reaches 35% overall. The top ten come to roughly 32% of assets, though Alphabet appears twice through its two share classes. The fee is 0.12% and the distribution yield 0.91%. The ETF launched in 2020.

Ticker
DFAU
Issuer
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Tracks
Actively managed, no tracked index
Expense ratio
0.12%
AUM
$12.3B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.91%
Inception
2020

DFAU is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.12% expense ratio, holds approximately $12.3B in assets under management, yields about 0.91%, and launched in 2020.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

The tilts adjust the market, they do not replace it

A common misreading of Dimensional funds is that a value and size tilt should produce a portfolio full of small, cheap companies. This one does not. The largest positions are the largest US companies, in roughly the order a market-value index would place them, with the weights nudged rather than overturned. NVIDIA at 6.6% and Apple at 5.9% sit at the top exactly as they would in a cap-weighted fund, and technology at 35% is close to what the broad US market carries.

The adjustment happens further down. Weight is shifted at the margin toward smaller companies, toward those trading at lower multiples of book value, and toward those with higher profitability, spread across hundreds of positions rather than expressed through a handful of large bets. That design keeps the fund recognisable as US market exposure while making it structurally different from an index fund over long periods.

It also means expectations should be calibrated accordingly. Anyone hoping this fund will avoid a concentrated technology sector, or sidestep the largest companies during a rough patch for them, is misreading what a core fund with tilts does.

Alphabet appears twice, and what that means

GOOGL at 2.7% and GOOG at 2.3% are the same company, listed through Class A and Class C shares. Combined, Alphabet is about 5.0% of the fund, which makes it the third largest holding rather than the fifth and seventh. Funds that hold both share classes are following the market structure faithfully, but a holdings table reads as if there are ten companies in the top ten when there are nine.

Doing the same arithmetic on the rest gives a clearer picture. NVIDIA 6.6%, Apple 5.9%, Alphabet 5.0%, Microsoft 4.1%, Amazon 3.2%, Broadcom 2.3%, Micron 2.0%, Meta 1.8% and Tesla 1.6%. That is nine companies for roughly a third of the fund, six of which sit in technology or semiconductors. Micron at 2.0% is a notable inclusion, since a memory manufacturer would be a smaller weight in a strictly cap-weighted portfolio and its presence at this level is consistent with a profitability and valuation tilt.

None of this makes the fund a technology bet in the way a sector product would be. The weights follow the market, so if the largest companies shrink in relative value the fund's exposure declines with them without any decision being taken. What it does mean is that DFAU carries the same top-heaviness the US market carries, and tilts applied across hundreds of smaller positions cannot offset a third of the fund sitting in nine names.

Fee, structure and where it does not fit

At 0.12%, DFAU costs more than the cheapest total US market index funds and far less than conventional active management. The question is not whether 0.12% is expensive in absolute terms but whether the tilts justify a premium over a near-zero-fee tracker. That is a judgment about factor exposure, not about cost.

The 0.91% yield reflects a US market in which large companies return cash mainly through buybacks, so this is not an income holding. The fund is also poorly suited to an investor who needs to track a standard US benchmark closely, since the tilts guarantee divergence, or to someone who wants explicit small-cap or value exposure, which a dedicated fund delivers far more forcefully than a core fund with adjustments applied at the edges.

Turnover deserves a note. Systematic tilts require periodic adjustment as companies change in size, valuation and profitability, so the fund trades more than a pure index tracker. Dimensional's approach is built to keep that trading patient and cost-aware, and the ETF structure handles in-kind transfers efficiently, but in a taxable account the difference between a low-turnover index fund and a tilted one is worth examining in the fund's own distribution disclosures rather than assumed away.

DFAU holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of DFAU
1NVDANVIDIA Corp6.6%
2AAPLApple Inc5.9%
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.1%
4AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.2%
5GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A2.7%
6AVGOBroadcom Inc2.3%
7GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C2.3%
8MUMicron Technology Inc2.0%
9METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A1.8%
10TSLATesla Inc1.6%

How do I invest in DFAU?

There are three common ways to get DFAU exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of DFAU directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so DFAU sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. DFAU trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is DFAU a good buy?

Whether DFAU is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFAU a buy?

The bottom line on DFAU

DFAU gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.12% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on DFAU

Whether DFAU is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFAU a buy?

DFAU yields 0.91% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see DFAU dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like DFAU? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how DFAU fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in DFAU with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DFAU fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Is DFAU an index fund?

+

No. Dimensional runs it systematically against its own eligibility and weighting rules rather than tracking a published benchmark. In practice it behaves much like a broad US market fund, since the largest holdings and sector weights closely resemble the market. The difference lies in marginal weight adjustments across hundreds of positions and in freedom over trade timing.

Why is Alphabet listed twice?

+

GOOGL is the Class A share and GOOG the Class C. Both represent the same company, and the fund holds each because both are separately listed and index-eligible. Added together they are about 5.0% of assets, which makes Alphabet the third largest exposure in the fund rather than two mid-sized positions as the table suggests.

What tilts does the fund apply?

+

Weight is shifted toward smaller companies, toward those trading at lower valuations relative to book value, and toward those with higher operating profitability. The adjustments are applied broadly and gently rather than through a screen that excludes most of the market, which is why the top of the fund still looks like the top of the US market.

Why is technology 35% if the fund tilts to value?

+

Because the tilt adjusts market weights rather than replacing them. The US market itself is heavily weighted to technology, and a core fund that starts from market weights inherits that. Trimming the sector to a value-fund level would require abandoning the broad market exposure the fund is designed to provide.

How does DFAU compare with a total US market index fund?

+

The holdings overlap almost entirely and the largest positions match. The differences are the 0.12% fee against near-zero for the cheapest trackers, and the marginal tilts toward size, value and profitability that accumulate slowly. Over short periods the two will look nearly identical; over long ones the tilts are the only reason to prefer one.

Does it pay meaningful income?

+

The distribution yield is 0.91%. Large US companies return most of their cash through share repurchases rather than dividends, so any broad US equity fund yields little. The profitability tilt does not change this materially, since highly profitable companies in the US are among the heaviest buyers of their own stock.

How long has the fund existed?

+

The ETF launched in 2020, so its live record in this wrapper covers a short period. That is worth noting when comparing it against funds with decades of history, though the underlying approach is applied across many Dimensional products. Judging systematic tilts requires longer samples than a few years can provide.

Who is DFAU the wrong choice for?

+

Investors who need to match a standard US benchmark closely, because the tilts guarantee periods of divergence. Investors seeking pronounced small-cap or value exposure, which a dedicated fund delivers far more directly. And investors focused on income, given the 0.91% yield leaves little to distribute.

What is DFAU's expense ratio?

+

DFAU has an expense ratio of 0.12% per year as of August 2026, charged by Dimensional Fund Advisors and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $12 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.

How do I compare DFAU to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. DFAU's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Dimensional Fund Advisors's fund page or your broker before investing.