What Is DFUV? Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
DFUV is Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.21% expense ratio. DFUV is Dimensional's systematic value fund, and its holdings make an argument about what the word value means. The largest position is Micron Technology at 5.8%, and Amazon sits in the top ten at 2.5%. Neither is what most people picture when they hear the term. The reason is that Dimensional screens on price relative to fundamentals rather than on dividends, which is also why the yield is only 1.31%. It charges 0.21%, holds about $15.3 billion, and carries a 1998 inception date that predates the ETF wrapper.
DFUV is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.21% expense ratio, holds approximately $15.3B in assets under management, yields about 1.31%, and launched in 1998.
What Dimensional means by value
There are two common ways to build a value fund and they produce genuinely different portfolios. One screens for high dividend yield, selecting companies that distribute a large share of earnings. The other screens for a low price relative to book value, earnings or cash flow, selecting companies the market prices modestly against their own fundamentals. Dimensional works from the second, and the 1.31% yield is the visible result. A dividend-screened value fund in the same category would typically pay two to three times that figure.
This explains Micron at 5.8% and Intel at 1.8%. Semiconductor manufacturers cycle between periods of heavy capital spending and periods of high earnings, and a price-based screen can classify them as inexpensive at points in that cycle when a dividend screen would exclude them entirely. The same logic reaches into industries that a traditional value investor might not associate with the label at all.
It also explains Amazon at 2.5%. A price-based measure is a relative judgement made against a company's own fundamentals, not a judgement about which industry it belongs to or how fast it is growing. Funds built this way regularly hold names that the word value does not evoke, and the presence of those names is the screen working as designed rather than drifting away from its mandate.
Systematic, but not an index fund
Dimensional does not track a published benchmark. The portfolio is built from rules applied continuously rather than from an index reconstituted on set calendar dates, which is why the index field on this page reads actively managed rather than naming a benchmark. That distinction is more than administrative.
The practical difference is trading. An index fund must own what its index says on the day the index says it, which is a known and widely exploited pattern around reconstitution dates. A rules-based manager without that constraint can trade patiently around the same underlying signals, buying when a seller is motivated rather than when a calendar demands it. Whether that flexibility helps is not something this page can demonstrate, and no return data is presented anywhere on it.
The 1998 inception is older than the ETF wrapper for a fund of this type. Dimensional has converted a number of long-running mutual funds into exchange-traded form, and the date reflects the strategy's history rather than the ETF's. Treat it as a statement about how long the approach has existed, not about how long the ticker has traded.
Marketwide is doing work in the name
Most value funds stop at a size boundary and say so: large value, mid value, small value. Marketwide means the screen runs across the size range, so mid-sized and smaller companies can appear alongside the familiar large caps even though Morningstar files the fund under Large Value. Someone building a portfolio from separate size and style boxes should account for that overlap rather than assuming a clean boundary.
Sector weights run financials 22%, technology 18%, industrials 14%, healthcare 14% and energy 11%. Eighteen percent in technology is high for a value fund and follows directly from the price-based screen described above. Financials at 22% is more conventional, since banks and insurers usually trade at modest multiples of book value and appear in almost every value portfolio.
At 0.21% the fee sits above a plain cap-weighted value index fund and well below a discretionary active manager. That is the trade being offered: rules-based construction with flexibility over implementation, priced between the two alternatives. Whether it is worth the difference depends entirely on which of those alternatives you would otherwise hold.
DFUV holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
How do I invest in DFUV?
There are three common ways to get DFUV exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of DFUV directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so DFUV sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. DFUV trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is DFUV a good buy?
Whether DFUV is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFUV a buy?
The bottom line on DFUV
DFUV gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.21% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on DFUV
Whether DFUV is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFUV a buy?
DFUV yields 1.31% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see DFUV dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like DFUV? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how DFUV fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in DFUV with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DFUV fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is DFUV?
+
DFUV is the Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF. It applies Dimensional's systematic value screen across the whole US market rather than within a single size band. It charges 0.21%, holds about $15.3 billion, yields roughly 1.31%, and carries a 1998 inception date reflecting the strategy's history rather than the ETF wrapper. Morningstar files it under Large Value despite the marketwide construction.
Is DFUV an index fund?
+
No. Dimensional does not track a published benchmark, so there is no index the fund is obliged to replicate. The portfolio is built from rules applied continuously rather than from an index that reconstitutes on fixed dates. That gives the manager flexibility over when to trade, which is the main practical benefit claimed for the approach. It also means there is no third-party index against which tracking error can be measured.
Why is the yield only 1.31% for a value fund?
+
Because the screen is price-based rather than income-based. Dimensional selects on price relative to fundamentals such as book value, earnings or cash flow, not on dividend yield. Those two screens select genuinely different companies. A dividend-focused value fund in the same Morningstar category would typically pay considerably more and would hold a very different set of names, with far less technology in it.
Why is Micron the largest holding in a value fund?
+
Micron is at 5.8%, the largest position in the portfolio. Semiconductor memory manufacturers swing between periods of heavy capital spending and periods of very high earnings, and a price-relative-to-fundamentals screen can classify them as inexpensive at points in that cycle. A dividend screen would not select them at all. The holding is a direct and predictable consequence of how this fund defines value.
What does Marketwide mean in the name?
+
It means the value screen runs across the whole size range rather than within a single band. Most value funds are labelled large, mid or small and stay inside those boundaries. DFUV can hold companies across them, so mid-sized and smaller names sit alongside the large caps even though Morningstar files the fund under Large Value. That matters for anyone assembling a portfolio from separate size buckets.
Is 0.21% expensive?
+
It sits between two clear reference points. A plain cap-weighted value index fund typically costs a fraction of it. A discretionary active manager running a similar mandate typically costs considerably more. At 0.21% you are paying for rules-based construction combined with trading flexibility, priced in the middle of that range. Whether that represents good value depends on which alternative you would hold instead.
How does DFUV differ from a large-cap value index fund?
+
In three ways. It spans the size range rather than stopping at large caps. It is not bound to an index reconstitution calendar, so it can trade when conditions suit rather than when a date arrives. And the screen itself is price-based, which produces holdings such as Micron and Amazon that a dividend-weighted value index would not include at any size.
Who is DFUV a poor fit for?
+
Anyone buying it primarily for income. At 1.31% the yield is lower than many broad market funds, and nothing in the construction suggests that will change. It is also a poor fit for someone who wants their value allocation to steer clear of technology, since technology is 18% of the fund by design rather than by accident, and the screen will keep selecting cyclical technology names when their prices are low relative to fundamentals.
What is DFUV's expense ratio?
+
DFUV has an expense ratio of 0.21% per year as of August 2026, charged by Dimensional Fund Advisors and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $21 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.
How do I compare DFUV to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. DFUV's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Dimensional Fund Advisors's fund page or your broker before investing.