What Is DIHP? Dimensional International High Profitability ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

DIHP is Dimensional International High Profitability ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.27% expense ratio. DIHP applies a profitability screen to developed markets outside the United States, holding companies with higher operating profitability relative to their book value. The counterintuitive result is a lower income stream than a broader international fund: the distribution yield is 1.95%. Concentration is also higher, with ASML at 4.3% and Roche at 3.0%, roughly double the equivalent weights in Dimensional's broader international fund. Industrials lead the sector table at 23%. The fee is 0.27% and the ETF launched in 2022.

Ticker
DIHP
Issuer
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Tracks
Actively managed, no tracked index
Expense ratio
0.27%
AUM
$6.2B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
1.95%
Inception
2022

DIHP is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.27% expense ratio, holds approximately $6.2B in assets under management, yields about 1.95%, and launched in 2022.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Profitable companies keep more of their earnings

Investors often assume a quality or profitability screen will raise the dividend yield, on the reasoning that profitable companies can afford to pay more. In international markets the opposite frequently holds. The highest-yielding developed-market companies tend to be banks, utilities, telecoms and energy producers, which distribute heavily because their reinvestment opportunities are limited. Screening for high operating profitability skews away from those and toward companies that redeploy capital into their own growth.

The yield gap illustrates it directly. This fund pays 1.95% while Dimensional's broader international core fund pays 2.35%, and the difference is entirely a composition effect. Financials, the largest sector in the broad fund at 23%, do not lead here at all. Industrials at 23%, technology at 15% and healthcare at 12% do.

That is worth internalising before using a profitability fund as an income holding. It is a return-driver screen, not an income screen, and the two select in different directions.

A narrower list, held in larger size

ASML is 4.3% of the fund and Roche 3.0%. In the broader Dimensional international fund the same two companies sit at 2.0% and 1.0%. Nestle at 2.1%, Tokyo Electron at 1.8%, BHP at 1.5%, AstraZeneca at 1.5%, Novartis at 1.5%, Sony at 1.4% and LVMH at 1.3% complete the top of the portfolio. These are larger positions than a broad core fund carries, because the profitability screen removes a substantial part of the eligible universe and the remaining weight has to go somewhere.

The names themselves describe what a profitability screen finds abroad: semiconductor equipment, pharmaceuticals, branded consumer goods, mining, consumer electronics and luxury. What it does not find in quantity is banks, which is the single biggest structural difference between this and a conventional developed-market fund.

Concentration also raises the stakes on individual outcomes. A 4.3% position in one semiconductor equipment maker means the fund carries real exposure to a single, cyclical end market, which is not a characteristic most investors associate with a diversified international allocation.

Cost, record and where it does not fit

The 0.27% fee is above the 0.18% Dimensional charges for its broad international core fund. The difference is the price of the screen. Whether that is worth paying depends on whether an investor believes the profitability premium is real and persistent, since without it the cheaper and more diversified alternative does a similar job.

The 2022 launch is a short record, and any assessment based on live results from this vehicle alone rests on a very small sample. That is a general caution about young ETFs rather than a criticism of this one specifically.

It is the wrong tool for income seekers, given the 1.95% yield undercuts a broader international fund. It is also poorly suited to an investor who wants their international allocation to track a familiar benchmark, since a profitability screen guarantees a portfolio that looks nothing like a cap-weighted developed-market index.

DIHP holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of DIHP
1ASMLASML Holding NV ADR4.3%
2Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new3.0%
3Nestle SA2.1%
4Tokyo Electron Ltd1.8%
5BHP Group Ltd1.5%
6AstraZeneca PLC1.5%
7NVSNovartis AG ADR1.5%
8Sony Group Corp1.4%
9Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE1.3%

How do I invest in DIHP?

There are three common ways to get DIHP exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of DIHP directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so DIHP sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. DIHP trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is DIHP a good buy?

Whether DIHP is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DIHP a buy?

The bottom line on DIHP

DIHP gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.27% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on DIHP

Whether DIHP is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DIHP a buy?

DIHP yields 1.95% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see DIHP dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like DIHP? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how DIHP fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in DIHP with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DIHP fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What does high profitability mean in this context?

+

Dimensional measures operating profitability relative to book equity and weights toward companies scoring highly on it. The reasoning is that among companies trading at similar valuations, the more profitable ones have historically delivered stronger returns. It is a characteristic-based screen applied systematically across a broad universe rather than a judgment about individual business quality, and it is maintained continuously rather than at a fixed annual review.

Why is the yield lower than a broad international fund?

+

Because the highest-yielding developed-market companies are typically banks, utilities, telecoms and energy producers, which pay out heavily precisely because their reinvestment opportunities are limited. A profitability screen tilts away from them and toward businesses that retain earnings to fund growth. The result is 1.95% here against 2.35% for Dimensional's broad international core fund, a gap that is entirely a composition effect rather than a decision about distributions.

How concentrated is DIHP?

+

More than a broad core fund. ASML at 4.3% and Roche at 3.0% are roughly double their weights in Dimensional's wider international fund, and the rest of the top ten runs from 2.1% down to 1.3%. Screening removes part of the universe, so the surviving companies necessarily hold larger positions. A 4.3% single-stock weight is meaningful in a fund most people hold for diversification.

Does it hold banks?

+

Far fewer than a conventional developed-market fund. Financials are the largest sector in a cap-weighted international index, but they are absent from the top of this portfolio, which is led by industrials at 23%, technology at 15% and healthcare at 12%. Banks rarely score highly on operating profitability relative to book equity, because their business models rest on leverage rather than on high operating margins.

Is 0.27% justified against the cheaper core fund?

+

It is 0.09 percentage points more than Dimensional charges for its broad international core fund. The extra cost buys the profitability screen and the concentration it produces. Whether that trade is worth making depends entirely on whether an investor wants a profitability tilt at all, since the cheaper fund covers the same markets more broadly.

What countries does it cover?

+

Developed markets outside the United States. The top holdings are Dutch, Swiss, Japanese, Australian, British and French companies, which is the usual shape of a developed non-US portfolio. The precise eligible universe is defined in the fund documents rather than by an index provider, since Dimensional does not track a benchmark here.

How long has the fund existed?

+

It launched in 2022, so the live record is short and covers only a limited range of market conditions. Profitability tilts are argued from long historical datasets rather than from a few years of fund results, and judging this vehicle on its own history alone would mean drawing conclusions from a very small sample.

Who is DIHP a poor fit for?

+

Income-focused investors, since the yield is lower than a broad international fund rather than higher. Investors who need their international allocation to track a familiar index closely, because a profitability screen guarantees extended divergence in both directions. And anyone uncomfortable with a 4.3% single-stock position in a fund held for diversification, or with a live record that only begins in 2022.

What is DIHP's expense ratio?

+

DIHP has an expense ratio of 0.27% per year as of August 2026, charged by Dimensional Fund Advisors and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $27 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.

How do I compare DIHP to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. DIHP's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Dimensional Fund Advisors's fund page or your broker before investing.