What Is FBCG? Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
FBCG is Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.57% expense ratio. FBCG is actively managed, and the clearest evidence is its top position: NVIDIA at 13.9%, followed by Apple at 9.1%, Alphabet at 8.5% and Amazon at 6.6%. Those four are 38.1% of the fund on their own, and the top ten come to roughly 53.9%. Technology is 52% of the portfolio, with consumer discretionary at 15% and communication services at 14%. The distribution yield is 0.04%, effectively nil. Fidelity charges 0.57%, the fund holds $7.0B and it launched in 2020.
FBCG is issued by Fidelity and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.57% expense ratio, holds approximately $7.0B in assets under management, yields about 0.04%, and launched in 2020.
Concentration is the strategy, not a side effect
Diversified index funds operate under rules that cap how large any single position can grow, both from index methodology and from the diversification requirements that apply to registered funds. A 13.9% weight in one company sits at the outer edge of what those constraints permit and reflects a deliberate decision rather than passive drift.
That is what an investor is paying for here. Half the fund sits in ten companies, and the largest four are more than a third of it. If those specific businesses do well, the fund's outcome is largely determined by them. If one of them stumbles badly, there is no diversification underneath to absorb it.
The corollary is that comparisons with large-cap growth index funds are only partly informative. FBCG can hold what an index cannot, in sizes an index would not, and can move out of a position without waiting for a reconstitution date. It is a manager's portfolio with a familiar-sounding label.
Blue chip growth, in practice, is semiconductors
NVIDIA at 13.9%, Broadcom at 3.8%, Micron Technology at 2.1% and SanDisk at 1.7% put roughly 21.5% of the fund in semiconductor and memory companies. That is a large single-industry concentration, and it is worth recognising as an industry position rather than as generic technology exposure. Chips are cyclical: capacity, inventory and pricing move in waves that do not follow the general economy.
Micron and SanDisk are specifically memory businesses, the most cyclical corner of the sector, where pricing can swing dramatically between shortage and glut. Their presence alongside NVIDIA means the fund is exposed both to the demand side of the artificial intelligence buildout and to the memory pricing cycle that has historically been far more volatile than the rest of technology.
The remainder of the top ten is more familiar: Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft at 3.7%, Eli Lilly at 2.7% and Meta Platforms at 1.8%. Healthcare at 6% is the fund's fourth-largest sector, which is a modest counterweight to a portfolio otherwise anchored in technology and the platforms.
0.57% and a 2020 launch
0.57% is roughly ten to fifteen times what a large-cap growth index fund charges. That is the cost of the manager's discretion, and it compounds against you every year regardless of outcome. The bar an active manager must clear is not zero; it is the fee plus whatever an index fund in the same category would have delivered.
The fund launched in 2020, so its live record is short and covers a distinctive period for large-cap growth. Judging an active strategy on a stretch that short is difficult in either direction, because the results reflect the regime as much as the process. What can be assessed now is the shape of the portfolio, the fee and how much it overlaps with what you already hold.
The 0.04% yield tells its own story. This is a total-return holding with essentially no income component, which also means very little annual tax drag from distributions in a taxable account, with the tax consequence deferred to sale. The ETF wrapper limits capital gains distributions relative to a mutual fund running the same portfolio.
FBCG holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
How do I invest in FBCG?
There are three common ways to get FBCG exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of FBCG directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so FBCG sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. FBCG trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is FBCG a good buy?
Whether FBCG is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FBCG a buy?
The bottom line on FBCG
FBCG gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.57% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on FBCG
Whether FBCG is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FBCG a buy?
FBCG yields 0.04% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see FBCG dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like FBCG? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how FBCG fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in FBCG with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how FBCG fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
Is FBCG an index fund?
+
No. It is actively managed, with a portfolio manager choosing positions and sizing them. The 13.9% weight in a single stock is direct evidence of that, since most index methodologies and the diversification rules applying to registered funds constrain positions well below such a level. There is no benchmark it is obliged to track.
What does blue chip growth mean in practice here?
+
Large, established companies the manager expects to grow earnings above average. In this portfolio that translates to technology at 52%, consumer discretionary at 15% and communication services at 14%, with roughly 21.5% specifically in semiconductor and memory companies. The blue chip label describes the size of the companies rather than any defensive or income characteristic.
Why is the yield only 0.04%?
+
Because the fund holds companies that reinvest their earnings rather than distribute them. Growth-oriented large caps typically pay small dividends or none. The practical effect is that essentially all of the fund's outcome comes from price change, and there is almost no annual ordinary-income tax cost in a taxable account, with the tax consequence deferred to when you sell.
How concentrated is the portfolio?
+
Substantially. The top four positions, NVIDIA, Apple, Alphabet and Amazon, are 38.1% of the fund, and the top ten come to roughly 53.9%. Adding sector concentration on top, technology alone is 52%. The fund should be sized in a portfolio as a concentrated position, not as a diversified core holding, whatever the broad-sounding name suggests.
Why does it cost 0.57%?
+
That is the price of active management: research, a portfolio manager's judgment and the flexibility to deviate from any index. Passive large-cap growth exposure is available for a small fraction of it. The fee is a certain cost measured against an uncertain benefit, and it is charged annually whether or not the manager's decisions add value in a given period.
How does FBCG differ from a Nasdaq-100 fund?
+
A Nasdaq-100 fund follows a rule set: all non-financial companies listed on the exchange, weighted by market value with caps, changed only on scheduled reconstitutions. FBCG holds what its manager selects, in weights the manager chooses, and can exit at any time. Their largest holdings overlap heavily, but the reasons for those weights, and the ability to change them, differ entirely.
What happens if the portfolio manager changes?
+
The strategy can change with them. This is the specific risk of active funds that does not exist in index products: the process lives with individuals, and a change in personnel can alter how the portfolio is constructed. Manager tenure is worth checking on any actively managed fund, and it is disclosed in the prospectus and fund documentation.
Is a 2020 launch long enough to evaluate?
+
It is a short record for an active strategy, and it covers a distinctive stretch for large-cap growth. Results over such a period reflect the market regime as much as the manager's process, which makes attribution difficult in either direction. What can be examined today is the portfolio's construction, its concentration, its fee and how much it duplicates what you already own.
What is FBCG's expense ratio?
+
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% per year as of August 2026, charged by Fidelity and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $57 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.
How do I compare FBCG to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. FBCG's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Fidelity's fund page or your broker before investing.