What Is FDN? First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

FDN is First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund, an ETF that tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index at a 0.49% expense ratio. FDN was built in 2006 around an index that defines internet companies by how much of their revenue comes from internet operations. Two decades later that definition produces an unexpected roster. Cisco Systems, a maker of networking hardware, is the third-largest position at 8.5%. Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA are absent entirely. Amazon leads at 10.0% and Meta follows at 9.8%, while Alphabet appears across two share classes totalling 10.0%. The ten largest holdings are 60.9% of assets. First Trust charges 0.49% and the fund pays nothing, with a 0.00% yield.

Ticker
FDN
Issuer
First Trust
Tracks
the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index
Expense ratio
0.49%
AUM
$5.0B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.00%
Inception
2006

FDN is issued by First Trust and tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. It charges a 0.49% expense ratio, holds approximately $5.0B in assets under management, yields about 0.00%, and launched in 2006.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

What an internet company meant in 2006

The index behind FDN admits companies that derive a substantial share of revenue from internet commerce or internet services, and splits them into commerce and services groups. When that rule was written, the distinction between an internet company and a technology company was meaningful. Today the largest technology companies sell devices, cloud infrastructure and semiconductors, and several of them do not qualify under a revenue test built for a different era.

The result is a portfolio with conspicuous absences. Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA are among the largest companies in the world and none appears here. Meanwhile Cisco Systems sits at 8.5%, the third-largest weight, on the strength of selling the equipment that networks run on. Oracle at 4.6% and Salesforce at 4.1% represent enterprise software rather than consumer internet.

This is not a defect in the fund's execution. FDN tracks its index faithfully. It is a reminder that a thematic index encodes the definitions current at the time it was written, and that themes drift away from their definitions faster than indices are rewritten.

Concentration by design

The ten largest positions come to 60.9% of the fund. Amazon at 10.0%, Meta at 9.8% and Cisco at 8.5% lead, with Alphabet contributing 10.0% across its Class A and Class C listings, which are one company held under two lines. Arista Networks and Booking Holdings sit at 5.0% each, Oracle at 4.6%, Salesforce at 4.1% and Netflix at 3.9%.

By sector, technology is 45%, consumer discretionary 26% and communication services 25%, with financials at 2% and industrials at 1%. Those three sectors carry essentially the entire fund. Anyone holding FDN is making a concentrated bet on a handful of very large companies, not taking diversified exposure to an industry.

The 0.00% yield is a straightforward consequence of which companies qualify. Internet businesses have historically reinvested rather than distributed, and the ones here that do pay dividends carry too little weight to register. Any return from this fund has to come from price movement, since there is no income component at all.

Cost and alternatives

At 0.49%, FDN is priced well above broad technology index funds and above most sector ETFs. Part of that reflects its age: it launched in 2006, before fee competition compressed the sector, and it has retained assets, $5.0 billion of them, without needing to cut. Part reflects the specialised index licence behind it.

The practical comparison is against a broad technology fund or a communication services fund. Those hold many of the same companies, cost considerably less, and in most cases include the large technology names FDN's definition excludes. An investor who specifically wants the internet-revenue screen has a reason to pay the difference. An investor who assumed they were buying technology exposure generally is paying more for less coverage.

It is the wrong tool for an income requirement, given the 0.00% yield, and the wrong tool for anyone who cannot tolerate a fund where three positions account for nearly a third of assets. It is a targeted holding, and the targeting is narrower and older than the name conveys.

FDN holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of FDN
1AMZNAmazon.com Inc10.0%
2METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A9.8%
3CSCOCisco Systems Inc8.5%
4GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A5.6%
5ANETArista Networks Inc5.0%
6BKNGBooking Holdings Inc5.0%
7ORCLOracle Corp4.6%
8GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C4.4%
9CRMSalesforce Inc4.1%
10NFLXNetflix Inc3.9%

How do I invest in FDN?

There are three common ways to get FDN exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of FDN directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so FDN sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. FDN trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is FDN a good buy?

Whether FDN is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FDN a buy?

The bottom line on FDN

FDN gives you the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.49% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on FDN

Whether FDN is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FDN a buy?

FDN yields 0.00% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see FDN dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like FDN? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how FDN fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in FDN with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how FDN fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why does FDN hold Cisco Systems?

+

The Dow Jones Internet Composite Index selects companies by the share of revenue derived from internet commerce and internet services, and Cisco qualifies through its networking business. It is the third-largest holding at 8.5%. The classification follows the index's revenue definition rather than a common-sense notion of which companies are internet businesses today.

Why are Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA missing?

+

None of them meets the index's internet-revenue test. Apple's revenue is dominated by hardware, Microsoft's by software and cloud services sold to enterprises, NVIDIA's by semiconductors. The index was written when the boundary between internet and technology companies was clearer. Those three are among the world's largest companies and FDN holds none of them.

How concentrated is FDN?

+

The ten largest positions total 60.9% of assets. Amazon is 10.0%, Meta 9.8% and Cisco 8.5%, with Alphabet contributing 10.0% across two share classes. Sector exposure is nearly all technology, consumer discretionary and communication services. This is a concentrated fund, and single-company news moves it in a way a broad index fund would absorb.

Why does Alphabet appear twice in the holdings list?

+

Alphabet has two publicly traded share classes and the index includes both. Class A at 5.6% and Class C at 4.4% combine to 10.0% of the fund. They are one company under two listings, so the effective top holding is not Amazon alone but Amazon and Alphabet at roughly equal size.

Why is the yield 0.00%?

+

The companies that qualify under the internet-revenue screen have overwhelmingly reinvested earnings rather than paid dividends, and the few that do distribute carry too small a weight to produce a measurable fund yield. Any return from FDN must come from share price movement. It is not usable as an income holding under any circumstances.

Is 0.49% expensive?

+

It is high relative to broad technology index funds and to most sector ETFs. The fund launched in 2006, before the sharpest rounds of fee competition, and has retained $5.0 billion in assets without cutting. Whether the premium is worth paying depends on whether the specific internet-revenue screen is what the investor wants, since cheaper funds cover overlapping territory.

How does FDN differ from a broad technology ETF?

+

A broad technology fund weights by market value across the full sector, which puts Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA at the top. FDN excludes all three and instead leads with Amazon, Meta, Alphabet and Cisco. Sector classification also differs: Amazon is a consumer discretionary company and Meta and Alphabet are communication services companies under standard schemes.

Has the index definition been a problem over time?

+

It has made the fund's composition drift from what its name implies. A thematic index encodes the definitions in force when it was written, and the internet has since become a feature of nearly every large business rather than a separate category. FDN tracks its index accurately; the gap is between that index and current usage of the word internet.

What is FDN's expense ratio?

+

FDN has an expense ratio of 0.49% per year as of August 2026, charged by First Trust and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $49 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index before you choose.

How do I compare FDN to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. FDN's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against First Trust's fund page or your broker before investing.