What Is GSIE? Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
GSIE is Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF, an ETF that tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index at a 0.25% expense ratio. GSIE applies Goldman's ActiveBeta multi-factor framework to developed international equities, and the holdings show clearly what blending several factors does to a portfolio. The largest position, ASML, is 2.6%. Nothing else reaches 1.2%. Once the cash management line is set aside, the ten largest real holdings come to roughly 10.3% of the fund. This is a strategy expressed through many small deviations rather than a few large bets. It charges 0.25%, holds about $5.8 billion, yields 2.58%, and launched in 2015.
GSIE is issued by Goldman Sachs and tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. It charges a 0.25% expense ratio, holds approximately $5.8B in assets under management, yields about 2.58%, and launched in 2015.
Blending factors dilutes each one
Single-factor funds produce distinctive portfolios. A pure value screen looks very different from a pure momentum screen, and both look quite different from the market they are drawn from. Combining several factors pulls the result back towards the market, because a company excluded by one screen is often included by another and the deviations partially cancel out.
GSIE's holdings show this clearly. ASML at 2.6%, Royal Bank of Canada at 1.1%, HSBC at 1.1%, Novartis at 1.0%, Roche at 1.0%, Advantest at 0.9%, AstraZeneca at 0.9%, Banco Santander at 0.9% and Toronto-Dominion Bank at 0.8%. These are large, familiar international companies, roughly what a cap-weighted fund would hold, at somewhat adjusted weights rather than a genuinely different roster.
That is not a criticism. A mild, diversified tilt is a defensible thing to want, and it avoids the concentration risk and the timing risk that a single-factor fund carries. But it should calibrate expectations in both directions: the deviation from a plain international index fund will be modest, and so will the range of outcomes on either side of it.
Financials at 27% and two Canadian banks in the top ten
Sector weights run financials 27%, industrials 19%, technology 11%, healthcare 10% and consumer discretionary 9%. Twenty-seven percent in financials is high in absolute terms, and reflects both the composition of international markets, which carry a much larger banking weight than the US market, and where value and quality screens tend to point outside the United States.
Royal Bank of Canada at 1.1% and Toronto-Dominion at 0.8% are both inside the top ten. Canada is often a modest allocation in international funds relative to Japan and the larger European markets, so seeing two Canadian banks that high in the holdings is worth noticing and is a genuine difference from a straight cap-weighted portfolio.
One line in the holdings table is not an investment at all. The Goldman Sachs FS Treasury Obligations entry at 1.2% is a cash management vehicle used to hold uninvested balances between trades. It appears as the second-largest line, which is misleading. Treat it as cash rather than as a position, and read the real top ten accordingly.
0.25% buys the screen, not the exposure
Plain cap-weighted developed international index funds are available for a fraction of this fee. Discretionary active international managers cost considerably more. GSIE sits between them, and the 0.25% is best read as the price of the factor screen layered on top of exposure you could obtain far more cheaply elsewhere in essentially the same companies.
The judgement, then, is not about whether international equities belong in a portfolio, which is a separate question, but about whether the multi-factor tilt earns its incremental cost. Since the tilt is deliberately mild by construction, the amount it needs to add is small. So, correspondingly, is the amount it plausibly can add in either direction.
The 2.58% yield is consistent with international equity generally, where payout ratios run higher than in the US market. It is a byproduct of what the screen happens to select rather than a target of the strategy, and it should not be read as an income feature of the fund.
GSIE holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
| Rank | Ticker | Company | % of GSIE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASML Holding NV | 2.6% | ||
| 2 | FTOXX | Goldman Sachs FS Treasury Obligs Instl | 1.2% | |
| 3 | RY | Royal Bank of Canada | 1.1% | |
| 4 | HSBC Holdings PLC | 1.1% | ||
| 5 | Novartis AG Registered Shares | 1.0% | ||
| 6 | Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new | 1.0% | ||
| 7 | Advantest Corp | 0.9% | ||
| 8 | AstraZeneca PLC | 0.9% | ||
| 9 | Banco Santander SA | 0.9% | ||
| 10 | TD | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 0.8% |
How do I invest in GSIE?
There are three common ways to get GSIE exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of GSIE directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so GSIE sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. GSIE trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is GSIE a good buy?
Whether GSIE is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is GSIE a buy?
The bottom line on GSIE
GSIE gives you the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.25% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on GSIE
Whether GSIE is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is GSIE a buy?
GSIE yields 2.58% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see GSIE dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like GSIE? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how GSIE fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in GSIE with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how GSIE fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is GSIE?
+
GSIE is the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF. It tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, applying a multi-factor screen to developed international companies. It charges 0.25%, holds about $5.8 billion, yields roughly 2.58%, and launched in 2015. Morningstar files it under Foreign Large Blend, which reflects how close the resulting portfolio sits to a broad international fund.
What is ActiveBeta?
+
It is Goldman's name for its multi-factor index framework. Rather than weighting companies purely by market value, the index scores them on several well-known equity characteristics and blends the results into a single set of weights. The exact screens and their relative importance are set by the published index methodology rather than by a portfolio manager's discretion, which is what keeps it an index product rather than an active one.
Why is the largest holding only 2.6%?
+
Because blending several factors dilutes each one. A company excluded by one screen is frequently included by another, so the deviations partly cancel and the combined portfolio moves back towards the market. ASML at 2.6% is the largest position and nothing else reaches 1.2%. The strategy is expressed through many small adjustments to market weights rather than through a few large, decisive positions.
What is the Goldman Sachs FS Treasury Obligations line in the holdings?
+
It is a cash management vehicle, not an equity position. Funds park uninvested cash in instruments like it while waiting to deploy capital or settle trades. At 1.2% it appears near the top of the holdings table, which can mislead anyone reading the list quickly. Read it as cash rather than as the fund's second-largest investment, and treat the real top ten as beginning below it.
Which countries appear in GSIE's largest holdings?
+
The top ten spans the Netherlands through ASML, Canada through Royal Bank of Canada and Toronto-Dominion, the United Kingdom through HSBC and AstraZeneca, Switzerland through Novartis and Roche, Japan through Advantest, and Spain through Banco Santander. That spread is typical of a developed international fund, though the Canadian representation is more prominent than in many of them.
Why is GSIE 27% financials?
+
International markets carry a substantially larger banking and insurance weight than the US market does, and value and quality screens outside the United States often point towards those sectors as well. The 27% figure is therefore partly the market and partly the screen reinforcing it. Financials is the fund's largest sector by a clear margin over industrials at 19%, and that gap is worth understanding before buying.
How does currency affect GSIE?
+
The holdings are denominated in euros, pounds, Swiss francs, Canadian dollars and yen among other currencies, while the fund reports in US dollars. A stronger dollar reduces the reported value of those positions independently of business performance, and a weaker one increases it. Over most periods that effect is considerably larger than either the fee or the factor tilt, which puts both in perspective.
How does GSIE compare with a plain international index fund?
+
It holds broadly the same companies at slightly different weights, and charges more for making the adjustment. A cap-weighted developed international fund is available for a fraction of 0.25%. The question is whether a mild multi-factor tilt is worth the difference in cost, and because the tilt is mild by construction, the plausible gap in outcomes either way is also modest.
What is GSIE's expense ratio?
+
GSIE has an expense ratio of 0.25% per year as of August 2026, charged by Goldman Sachs and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $25 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index before you choose.
How do I compare GSIE to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. GSIE's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Goldman Sachs's fund page or your broker before investing.