What Is IJK? iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
IJK is iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF, an ETF that tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index at a 0.17% expense ratio. The word growth on this fund suggests software. The portfolio says otherwise. Industrials are the largest sector at 31%, ahead of technology at 24%, healthcare at 14% and consumer discretionary and financials at 7% each. The top holdings include Carpenter Technology and ATI, both specialty alloy producers, alongside Curtiss-Wright, nVent Electric, TechnipFMC, Sterling Infrastructure, MasTec and Woodward. Twilio at 1.6% is the only pure software name near the top. iShares charges 0.17%, the fund holds $11.3B, yields 0.52% and dates from 2000.
IJK is issued by iShares and tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. It charges a 0.17% expense ratio, holds approximately $11.3B in assets under management, yields about 0.52%, and launched in 2000.
Mid-cap growth means machinery more than software
Fast-growing software companies tend not to stay in the mid-cap range for long. The ones that work graduate to large cap, and the ones that do not fall out of the index entirely. What remains in the S&P MidCap 400 growth cohort is a different kind of company: manufacturers, engineering contractors and specialty materials producers whose sales and earnings are accelerating for cyclical or contractual reasons.
The holdings show it plainly. Carpenter Technology and ATI make high-performance alloys for aerospace and defence. Curtiss-Wright supplies engineered components to naval and nuclear programmes. nVent Electric makes electrical enclosures and connections. Sterling Infrastructure and MasTec build things: data centre pads, roads, transmission lines. Woodward makes control systems for aircraft and industrial engines.
That composition means the fund's behaviour is tied to capital spending cycles, defence budgets, grid buildout and construction backlogs, not to software subscription growth. It is a legitimate growth exposure. It is just a different one from what the label implies, and it will not move in step with a large-cap growth fund.
How S&P builds a style index
S&P splits its parent indexes into growth and value using multiple factor scores rather than a single ratio. Growth scores draw on measures such as sales growth, earnings change relative to price and momentum. Value scores draw on book value, earnings and sales relative to price. Companies with mixed characteristics can have their market value divided between the growth and value indexes rather than being assigned entirely to one.
That has a practical consequence: IJK and its value counterpart are not mutually exclusive lists. Some companies appear in both, with partial weight in each. Owning both style funds is close to owning the parent MidCap 400, but not identical, because the weighting differs from a straight market cap split.
The top ten holdings sum to roughly 14.2% of the fund, running from 1.6% down to 1.3%. That is a fairly flat distribution, so no single company drives the fund. Compared with large-cap growth funds, where a handful of names can be half the portfolio, this is a far more diffuse structure.
Cost, yield and the case against splitting styles
0.17% is reasonable for a style-sliced index fund and roughly three times what the unsliced S&P MidCap 400 costs through the parent fund. The extra is paying for the style screen and the higher turnover that comes from companies moving between the growth and value buckets at each reconstitution.
That raises a fair question about whether the split is worth paying for. If you hold both the growth and value versions, you have approximately reconstructed the parent index at a higher fee and with more internal trading. The split makes sense only if the growth tilt itself is what you want, which is a deliberate choice rather than a default.
The 0.52% yield is low, consistent with a portfolio of companies reinvesting rather than distributing. This is not an income holding. It also means the ongoing tax cost in a taxable account is small, with most of the tax consequence deferred until sale.
IJK holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
How do I invest in IJK?
There are three common ways to get IJK exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of IJK directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so IJK sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. IJK trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is IJK a good buy?
Whether IJK is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IJK a buy?
The bottom line on IJK
IJK gives you the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.17% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on IJK
Whether IJK is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IJK a buy?
IJK yields 0.52% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see IJK dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like IJK? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how IJK fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in IJK with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how IJK fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
Why is the top sector industrials rather than technology?
+
Mid-cap growth in the US is dominated by manufacturers, engineering contractors and specialty materials firms whose earnings are accelerating, not by software. Fast-growing software companies usually leave the mid-cap range quickly in one direction or the other. The result is 31% industrials against 24% technology, which is close to the opposite of what a large-cap growth fund looks like.
What is the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index?
+
It is the growth half of the S&P MidCap 400, which covers mid-sized US companies that meet S&P's profitability and liquidity requirements. S&P assigns growth and value scores using several factors, including sales growth, earnings change relative to price and momentum, then splits the parent index accordingly. Companies with mixed characteristics can be divided between the growth and value indexes.
How does IJK differ from the value version of the same index?
+
They start from the same 400 companies and split them by style score. The growth side skews to industrials, technology and healthcare, while the value side leans toward financials, real estate and utilities. Because companies with mixed scores can appear in both, the two funds are not a clean partition, and holding both is close to but not the same as holding the parent index.
Can a company be in both the growth and value indexes?
+
Yes. S&P's methodology allows a company's market value to be divided between the two style indexes when its factor scores do not clearly favour one side. This differs from methodologies that force each company into exactly one bucket. It is the reason the growth and value versions of an S&P index do not add up cleanly to the parent index by holdings count.
Why is the yield only 0.52%?
+
Growth-screened companies generally retain earnings to fund expansion instead of distributing them. Specialty manufacturers and engineering contractors in the middle of a capital cycle typically pay small dividends if any. If income is the objective, a mid-cap value or dividend fund covers that ground; 0.52% here is essentially a side effect rather than a feature.
How concentrated is the fund?
+
Not very. The top ten holdings total roughly 14.2%, running from 1.6% at the top down to 1.3%. No single company can move the fund meaningfully on its own. The concentration that does exist is at sector level, where industrials and technology together account for 55%, which is the exposure to watch rather than any individual position.
How does IJK compare with just holding the whole MidCap 400?
+
The parent index fund is cheaper, holds all 400 companies and turns over less. IJK charges 0.17% for a growth-scored subset with more internal trading. The case for the slice rests entirely on wanting a growth tilt within mid caps. Holding both style funds together largely rebuilds the parent index at higher cost.
Is mid-cap growth exposure already in an S&P 500 fund?
+
No. The S&P 500 and the S&P MidCap 400 are separate, non-overlapping indexes by construction: a company sits in one or the other. So IJK's holdings are not duplicated by a large-cap core position. That is a genuine diversification argument, distinct from the style question of growth versus value.
What is IJK's expense ratio?
+
IJK has an expense ratio of 0.17% per year as of August 2026, charged by iShares and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $17 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index before you choose.
How do I compare IJK to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. IJK's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against iShares's fund page or your broker before investing.