What Is IWO? iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

IWO is iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, an ETF that tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index at a 0.24% expense ratio. IWO holds the growth half of the Russell 2000, and the sector split is the first thing worth reading: healthcare at 29% outweighs technology at 22%. In small caps, growth screening picks up clinical-stage biotechnology companies with no product revenue, which is a very different business than software. The portfolio is extremely flat, with no position above 0.7% and the ten largest coming to just 6.1% of assets. It charges 0.24%, yields 0.42% and has $15.4B invested. The fund dates to 2000, so it has a long history through several small-cap cycles.

Ticker
IWO
Issuer
iShares
Tracks
the Russell 2000 Growth Index
Expense ratio
0.24%
AUM
$15.4B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.42%
Inception
2000

IWO is issued by iShares and tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It charges a 0.24% expense ratio, holds approximately $15.4B in assets under management, yields about 0.42%, and launched in 2000.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Why healthcare outranks technology

Growth indices sort companies on measures such as sales growth and forecast earnings growth. Applied to large companies, that mostly selects software and semiconductors. Applied to the Russell 2000, it selects a great many biotechnology firms, because a company with a drug in trials and no revenue at all can screen as high growth on forward expectations while its actual income statement shows losses. Healthcare at 29% of the fund is that mechanism working exactly as written.

This changes what drives the fund. A basket weighted toward clinical-stage biotech responds to trial readouts, regulatory decisions and the cost of capital more than it responds to enterprise software spending. Krystal Biotech and BrightSpring Health Services both sit inside the top ten, from different parts of that spectrum. The technology sleeve is present at 22% and includes MaxLinear and JFrog, but it is not the centre of gravity many buyers assume it is.

Industrials at 16% add a third character again. Moog, Argan and ESCO Technologies are aerospace, power infrastructure and engineered products businesses, and they qualify as growth on order books rather than on research pipelines. A single fund therefore blends three quite different return drivers, which is worth knowing before treating it as a pure innovation holding.

A portfolio with no anchor positions

Nothing in IWO is larger than 0.7%, and the top ten together are 6.1% of the fund. That is close to the opposite of a large-cap index, where a handful of names can dominate. The practical consequence is that no individual holding can move the fund meaningfully. A biotech that doubles on trial results contributes a rounding error to the total, and one that collapses does the same in reverse.

Diversification of that depth is genuinely useful in a corner of the market where single-company failure is common. It also removes any prospect of stock selection helping, since the fund holds essentially everything that qualifies. What you are buying is the behaviour of the small-cap growth cohort as a group, including the persistent drag from the portion of it that never becomes profitable.

The presence of D-Wave Quantum in the top ten illustrates the reach of the screen. Speculative pre-commercial companies enter these indices as soon as they meet the size and style tests, and they exit when their market value falls or their style classification shifts. The fund does not judge them. It owns them at whatever weight the rules produce.

Fee, income and the alternatives

At 0.24% IWO costs several times what the cheapest small-cap index funds charge, and the gap is worth weighing given how much of small-cap returns can be consumed by costs over long holding periods. The 0.42% yield is close to nothing, which follows directly from the mandate: companies that reinvest everything or that have no earnings to distribute do not pay dividends.

The comparison most people should make is not against large-cap growth but against small-cap blend. Funds tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 apply a profitability requirement that removes much of the loss-making cohort IWO deliberately includes, and they typically cost less. Neither approach is superior in the abstract. They express different views about whether unprofitable small companies belong in a portfolio at all.

IWO fits an investor who wants deliberate exposure to that unprofitable, high-expectation cohort and understands that the ride includes long stretches of disappointment. It is the wrong holding for someone who wants small-cap exposure with the quality filter applied, and the wrong holding for anyone who needs income from the position.

IWO holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of IWO
1MOG-AMoog Inc Class A0.7%
2BTSGBrightSpring Health Services Inc0.7%
3MXLMaxLinear Inc0.7%
4AGXArgan Inc0.7%
5FROGJFrog Ltd Ordinary Shares0.6%
6KRYSKrystal Biotech Inc0.6%
7ESEESCO Technologies Inc0.6%
8FCFSFirstCash Holdings Inc0.5%
9QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc0.5%
10SNEXStoneX Group Inc0.5%

How do I invest in IWO?

There are three common ways to get IWO exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of IWO directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so IWO sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. IWO trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is IWO a good buy?

Whether IWO is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IWO a buy?

The bottom line on IWO

IWO gives you the Russell 2000 Growth Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.24% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on IWO

Whether IWO is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IWO a buy?

IWO yields 0.42% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see IWO dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like IWO? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how IWO fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in IWO with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how IWO fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the Russell 2000 Growth Index?

+

It is the growth half of the Russell 2000, which itself covers roughly the smallest two thousand companies in the broad Russell universe. Companies are sorted using growth characteristics such as sales growth and forecast earnings growth, and those scoring highest go into the growth index. Some companies appear partially in both the growth and value versions when their scores sit near the boundary.

Why is healthcare the biggest sector at 29%?

+

Because small-cap healthcare is dominated by clinical-stage biotechnology companies, and those companies screen as high growth on forward expectations even without product revenue. The growth filter therefore pulls them in heavily. Technology is second at 22%. Anyone expecting a technology-led portfolio from a small-cap growth fund is reading the label rather than the holdings.

How concentrated is IWO?

+

Barely at all. The largest positions are 0.7% and the ten biggest together come to 6.1% of assets. No single company can move the fund. That structure suits a market segment with a high individual failure rate, since it makes the fund a bet on the cohort rather than on any particular company inside it.

Why is the yield only 0.42%?

+

Growth screening selects companies that reinvest their cash or have no profits to distribute in the first place. A large biotechnology sleeve pays nothing by definition. The small distribution that does appear comes from the industrial and financial holdings. This is not an income fund and should not be assessed as one.

How does IWO differ from a small-cap blend fund?

+

Blend funds hold the whole size segment including value-classified companies, and those tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 also apply a profitability requirement before admission. IWO holds only the growth half and applies no profitability test, so it carries a larger share of loss-making companies. The two behave differently across cycles and should not be treated as substitutes.

Is 0.24% reasonable for this?

+

It is mid-range. Broad small-cap index funds are available for a fraction of that, though they do not offer the growth split. Style-specific small-cap products generally cost more than plain size exposure because the index licences are more expensive and the turnover from annual reconstitution is higher. Whether the split is worth the difference depends on how much you want the style tilt.

What happens at reconstitution?

+

The Russell indices rebuild annually, which is when companies move between size bands and between the growth and value halves. That produces meaningful turnover for style funds, since a company whose growth score falls can leave the index regardless of how the business is trading. It is one reason style index funds have higher internal costs than broad market ones.

Who is IWO the wrong fund for?

+

Anyone who wants their small-cap allocation filtered for profitability, and anyone who cannot tolerate long periods where a large sleeve of the portfolio consists of companies burning cash. It also makes a poor income holding at 0.42%. Its natural user has a specific view on small-cap growth and a horizon long enough to sit through the segment's cycles.

What is IWO's expense ratio?

+

IWO has an expense ratio of 0.24% per year as of August 2026, charged by iShares and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $24 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the Russell 2000 Growth Index before you choose.

How do I compare IWO to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. IWO's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against iShares's fund page or your broker before investing.