What Is IWS? iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
IWS is iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF, an ETF that tracks the Russell Mid-Cap Value Index at a 0.23% expense ratio. IWS holds the value half of the Russell Midcap universe, and its defining feature is flatness. All ten of its largest holdings sit at 0.6%, so the top ten together account for roughly 6% of the fund, a level of dispersion almost unheard of in a US equity ETF. iShares launched it in 2001 and it now holds $15.6B at 0.23%. Financials and industrials take 16% each, technology 13%, real estate 9%. The 1.32% yield is four times what the growth half of the same universe pays.
IWS is issued by iShares and tracks the Russell Mid-Cap Value Index. It charges a 0.23% expense ratio, holds approximately $15.6B in assets under management, yields about 1.32%, and launched in 2001.
A fund with no top holdings worth naming
Approximate weights as of August 2026; refresh quarterly from iShares's fund page. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
| Rank | Ticker | Company | % of IWS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WBD | Warner Bros. Discovery Inc Ordinary Shares - Class A | 0.6% | |
| 2 | PSX | Phillips 66 | 0.6% | |
| 3 | DLR | Digital Realty Trust Inc | 0.6% | |
| 4 | KMI | Kinder Morgan Inc Class P | 0.6% | |
| 5 | ALL | Allstate Corp | 0.6% | |
| 6 | HPE | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.6% | |
| 7 | FLEX | Flex Ltd | 0.6% | |
| 8 | O | Realty Income Corp | 0.6% | |
| 9 | DAL | Delta Air Lines Inc | 0.6% | |
| 10 | CTVA | Corteva Inc | 0.6% |
In most US equity funds the first few positions determine the outcome. Here they do not. Warner Bros. Discovery, Phillips 66, Digital Realty, Kinder Morgan, Allstate, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Flex, Realty Income, Delta Air Lines and Corteva are each 0.6%, and the list order is close to arbitrary at that level of precision.
The practical consequence is that single-company news barely registers. A holding falling by half costs the fund around 0.3%, which is inside a normal day's move. That is genuine diversification rather than the nominal kind, and it is unusual: cap-weighted US funds concentrate because the underlying market does, whereas the mid-cap range simply has no companies large enough to dominate.
It also means the fund is close to unforecastable from its holdings list. What drives IWS is which sectors and which factors are working, not what any particular business does.
What the value half of the universe contains
The sector mix reads like the older part of the economy: financials and industrials at 16% each, healthcare at 10%, and real estate at 9%, which is high by broad-market standards. Digital Realty and Realty Income both appear in the top ten, and mid-cap value is where a large share of the listed REIT universe sits, since most REITs are too small for large-cap indexes and too established for small-cap ones.
Energy infrastructure is present too, with Phillips 66 in refining and Kinder Morgan in pipelines. Those are cash-generative, capital-intensive businesses that screen cheap on book value, which is exactly what a value split selects for. Technology at 13% is not absent, but it arrives through Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Flex rather than software.
That composition explains the 1.32% yield. REITs, pipelines, refiners and insurers distribute cash, and a screen that selects on price relative to book value naturally lands on companies that do.
Where IWS is the wrong tool
It is not a complete mid-cap allocation. The growth half of the same Russell universe holds a different set of companies, weighted toward software and semiconductors, and owning only IWS leaves that out. Investors who want the whole mid-cap range without a style view can get it more cheaply from a single broad mid-cap fund at a fraction of the 0.23% fee.
It is also not a high-income holding, despite the tilt. A 1.32% yield is above the US market but well below a dedicated dividend or REIT fund, and the real estate weight is a by-product of the value screen rather than a deliberate income design. And the flatness protects only against single-company failure. Financials, industrials, real estate and energy infrastructure are all sensitive to credit conditions and to the economic cycle, and they tend to be repriced together in a recession scare, which is what a value tilt has felt like at its worst moments.
The clearest use is as a counterweight in a portfolio dominated by large-cap technology, where mid-cap value holds close to none of the same companies. That is a decision about correlation and sizing, and the fund's extreme flatness makes it a clean instrument for it.
How do I invest in IWS?
There are three common ways to get IWS exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of IWS directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so IWS sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. IWS trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is IWS a good buy?
Whether IWS is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Russell Mid-Cap Value Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IWS a buy?
The bottom line on IWS
IWS gives you the Russell Mid-Cap Value Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.23% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on IWS
Whether IWS is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IWS a buy?
IWS yields 1.32% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see IWS dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like IWS? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how IWS fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in IWS with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how IWS fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
Why is every top holding exactly 0.6%?
+
The Russell Midcap Value index is cap-weighted, but the mid-cap size range is narrow enough that its largest constituents are all of similar market value. With several hundred holdings and no dominant company, the top weights compress to a fraction of a percent each. It is a consequence of the universe, not a deliberate equal-weighting scheme.
Does that flatness make IWS safer?
+
It removes single-company risk almost entirely, which is real. It does nothing about sector or market risk, and IWS carries plenty of both, with 16% each in financials and industrials and 9% in real estate. Mid-cap value can fall hard in a credit or recession scare. Diversified across names does not mean diversified across outcomes.
How does IWS differ from IWP?
+
Same starting universe, opposite halves. IWS holds the value side: financials, industrials, real estate and energy infrastructure, yielding 1.32%. IWP holds the growth side, led by software and semiconductor names, yielding 0.34%. Their holdings barely overlap. Held together at index weights they approximate the full Russell Midcap index, which one broad fund covers more cheaply.
Why does IWS hold 9% in real estate?
+
The listed REIT sector sits largely in the mid-cap size range, and REITs screen as value on book-based measures because their balance sheets are dominated by property assets. Digital Realty and Realty Income are both in the top ten. The weight is an output of the value screen rather than a housing or property view expressed by the fund.
Is IWS a substitute for a dividend fund?
+
Not really. The 1.32% yield is higher than a broad US market fund and much higher than mid-cap growth, but a dedicated dividend fund screens directly for payout characteristics and typically yields considerably more. IWS pays what a value-screened mid-cap portfolio happens to pay. Income is a by-product here, not the objective.
What is the cheapest way to own the whole mid-cap market?
+
A single broad mid-cap index fund, several of which charge well under 0.10%, covers both style halves in one holding. IWS at 0.23% is priced for the value split specifically. Paying the extra basis points makes sense only if the style tilt is the point, not if the goal is simply mid-cap exposure.
How much overlap is there with an S&P 500 fund?
+
Limited. The Russell Midcap universe begins below the largest 200 US companies, so the megacaps that drive the S&P 500 are not present. There is some boundary overlap where the two size ranges meet, but the great majority of IWS's holdings are not meaningful positions in a large-cap fund.
What happens at the Russell reconstitution?
+
Once a year Russell rebuilds its indexes: companies are resized, style scores are recalculated, and some holdings move between the value and growth halves or leave the Midcap universe altogether. Most of the fund's annual turnover happens around that date. It is also when the fund's sector mix can shift more than it does across the remaining months.
What is IWS's expense ratio?
+
IWS has an expense ratio of 0.23% per year as of August 2026, charged by iShares and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $23 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the Russell Mid-Cap Value Index before you choose.
How do I compare IWS to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. IWS's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against iShares's fund page or your broker before investing.