What Is IXN? iShares Global Tech ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

IXN is iShares Global Tech ETF, an ETF that tracks a global index of information technology companies at a 0.39% expense ratio. IXN is a global technology fund, and the word global describes something more specific than it sounds. NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft alone are 31.9% of it. The four non-US names in the top ten are Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and ASML, together about 14.7%. All four make chips or the machines that make chips. The international portion of this fund is, in practice, the semiconductor supply chain. It charges 0.39%, holds about $9.5 billion, yields 0.24%, and dates from 2001.

Ticker
IXN
Issuer
iShares
Tracks
a global index of information technology companies
Expense ratio
0.39%
AUM
$9.5B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.24%
Inception
2001

IXN is issued by iShares and tracks a global index of information technology companies. It charges a 0.39% expense ratio, holds approximately $9.5B in assets under management, yields about 0.24%, and launched in 2001.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

The global part is the semiconductor supply chain

Taiwan Semiconductor at 4.9%, Samsung Electronics at 3.8%, SK Hynix at 3.3% and ASML at 2.7% are the four largest non-US positions. Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung fabricate chips, SK Hynix makes memory, and ASML supplies the lithography equipment that all of them depend on. They are four points on a single manufacturing chain rather than four separate industries.

There is no non-US software company, no non-US internet platform and no non-US services business anywhere in the top ten. That is not the fund being selective or the index being oddly constructed. It reflects where technology market value actually sits outside the United States, which is overwhelmingly in hardware and manufacturing rather than in software and platforms.

So an investor buying IXN for geographic diversification within technology is mostly buying a different point on the same industry chain, not a different kind of technology business. The correlation between those positions and the American semiconductor names in the same fund is likely to be higher than the country labels suggest.

Concentration, counted honestly

The ten largest holdings are about 59.5% of the fund. Three American companies account for 31.9% of it on their own: NVIDIA at 13.0%, Apple at 11.4% and Microsoft at 7.5%. That is close to a third of the portfolio in three businesses, before any of the international names are counted.

Semiconductors specifically account for a large share. NVIDIA, Taiwan Semiconductor, Broadcom, Micron, Samsung, AMD, SK Hynix and ASML together come to roughly 40.6% of the fund within the top ten alone, before anything further down the list is included. A fund labelled technology is closer in behaviour to a semiconductor fund with some software attached.

The sector table reads technology 99%, with communication services and industrials rounding to zero. That figure is accurate and almost entirely uninformative. The concentration that matters in this fund is by industry within technology and by individual company, neither of which a sector breakdown will ever show you.

The overlap problem and the fee

NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom and Micron are all top-ten positions in mainstream US large-cap index funds. Anyone holding an S&P 500 or mega-cap fund already owns them at a meaningful weight. Adding IXN concentrates further into the same handful of companies rather than reaching genuinely new ground, and the combined exposure is easy to lose track of across several funds.

At 0.39% the fee is well above what broad index exposure costs and typical for a sector fund. The premium buys the international portion and the sector focus. Given that the international portion is itself concentrated in one industry chain, the amount of genuinely differentiated exposure being purchased is narrower than the fee comparison alone suggests.

The 0.24% yield is close to nominal. Technology companies at this stage of development reinvest and buy back shares rather than distributing earnings, so income plays no part in the case for holding this fund. The 2001 inception does mean it has operated through the aftermath of the dot-com period and every technology cycle since, which is a longer record than most sector funds carry.

IXN holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of IXN
1NVDANVIDIA Corp13.0%
2AAPLApple Inc11.4%
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.5%
4Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.9%
5AVGOBroadcom Inc4.8%
6MUMicron Technology Inc4.7%
7Samsung Electronics Co Ltd3.8%
8AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.4%
9SK Hynix Inc3.3%
10ASML Holding NV2.7%

How do I invest in IXN?

There are three common ways to get IXN exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of IXN directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so IXN sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. IXN trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is IXN a good buy?

Whether IXN is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks a global index of information technology companies, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IXN a buy?

The bottom line on IXN

IXN gives you a global index of information technology companies exposure in one ticker at a 0.39% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on IXN

Whether IXN is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is IXN a buy?

IXN yields 0.24% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see IXN dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like IXN? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how IXN fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in IXN with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how IXN fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is IXN?

+

IXN is the iShares Global Tech ETF. It holds information technology companies worldwide, weighted by market value. It charges 0.39%, holds about $9.5 billion, yields roughly 0.24%, and launched in 2001. The sector table reads technology 99%, which confirms the label is literal but tells you nothing useful about the industry mix inside it, where semiconductors dominate.

How global is IXN really?

+

Three American companies are 31.9% of the fund between them. The four non-US names in the top ten are Taiwan Semiconductor, Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and ASML, together about 14.7%. All four sit in the semiconductor supply chain, three as manufacturers and one as an equipment supplier. The international exposure is real but narrow, concentrated in hardware manufacturing rather than spread across the technology industry.

How much of IXN is semiconductors?

+

Within the top ten alone, NVIDIA, Taiwan Semiconductor, Broadcom, Micron, Samsung, AMD, SK Hynix and ASML come to roughly 40.6% of the fund, and the full portfolio will contain more. That makes the chip industry the dominant driver of what this fund does. It is a considerably more specific exposure than the general technology label suggests to most buyers.

Does IXN overlap with an S&P 500 fund?

+

Heavily. NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom and Micron are all large positions in mainstream US index funds, so someone holding both owns those companies twice over at a combined weight that is easy to underestimate. IXN adds concentration in names already held plus a slice of non-US chip manufacturers, rather than adding breadth to a portfolio.

Is 0.39% expensive for a technology ETF?

+

It is typical for a global sector fund and high relative to broad market exposure, which costs a small fraction of it. The premium pays for the sector screen and the international holdings. Whether that is worthwhile depends on whether you specifically want the non-US chip exposure, since the largest American names in the fund are available far more cheaply inside any broad index product.

Why is the yield only 0.24%?

+

Technology companies at this stage generally reinvest earnings into research, capital equipment and acquisitions, or return capital through buybacks rather than dividends. A fund concentrated in them will produce very little distributable income by construction, not by choice. Income plays no part in the reason anyone holds this fund, and nothing about the sector suggests that will change soon.

How does currency affect IXN?

+

The non-US holdings are denominated in Taiwan dollars, Korean won and euros, while the fund reports in US dollars. A stronger dollar reduces the reported value of those positions independently of how the underlying businesses perform, and a weaker one has the opposite effect. That currency exposure applies to roughly the non-US share of the fund rather than to the American majority of it.

What would move IXN most?

+

The semiconductor cycle, given that chip-related names are roughly 40.6% of the fund within the top ten alone, and the fortunes of NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft, which together account for 31.9%. Broader developments across the technology industry matter considerably less than what happens to that specific handful of companies, which is a narrower dependency than the fund's name conveys.

What is IXN's expense ratio?

+

IXN has an expense ratio of 0.39% per year as of August 2026, charged by iShares and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $39 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track a global index of information technology companies before you choose.

How do I compare IXN to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. IXN's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against iShares's fund page or your broker before investing.