What Is JQUA? JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
JQUA is JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF, an ETF that tracks an index of US large- and mid-cap companies screened for quality characteristics at a 0.12% expense ratio. JQUA screens US large and mid-cap companies on quality measures such as profitability, earnings stability and leverage, then holds them at deliberately even weights. Nothing exceeds 2.3%: Micron leads at 2.3%, followed by AMD at 2.2%, then Apple, Alphabet, Broadcom and NVIDIA at 1.9% each. That flat structure is unusual for a large-cap fund and it is what separates JQUA from cap-weighted alternatives. Technology still ends up at 41% of assets. JPMorgan charges 0.12%, the fund launched in 2017, holds $8.2 billion and yields 1.08%.
JQUA is issued by J.P. Morgan Asset Management and tracks an index of US large- and mid-cap companies screened for quality characteristics. It charges a 0.12% expense ratio, holds approximately $8.2B in assets under management, yields about 1.08%, and launched in 2017.
Quality now selects semiconductors
Quality screens were designed to find durable businesses: consistent margins, low debt, steady earnings. For most of their history that pointed toward consumer staples, healthcare and industrial franchises. In this portfolio it points at chipmakers. Micron at 2.3% and AMD at 2.2% are the two largest positions, with Broadcom and NVIDIA close behind at 1.9%, and technology reaches 41% of the fund.
The mechanism is straightforward even if the outcome is not intuitive. Semiconductor companies have posted the profitability and earnings growth figures that quality metrics reward, so a rules-based screen picks them up. Whether the earnings stability of a memory manufacturer really matches the ordinary meaning of the word quality is a question the screen cannot ask.
Financials at 12%, consumer discretionary at 10%, industrials at 9% and healthcare at 9% fill out the rest. Johnson and Johnson at 1.6%, Berkshire Hathaway at 1.7% and Visa at 1.6% are the more traditional quality names in the top ten, sitting at roughly the same weight as the chipmakers above them.
Flat weights change what the fund is
A cap-weighted quality fund concentrates its screen output into whichever qualifying companies happen to be biggest, which usually means a handful of mega caps dominating. JQUA does not do that. The spread between the largest position at 2.3% and the tenth at 1.6% is narrow, indicating a weighting scheme that caps individual names rather than following market value.
The consequence is more exposure to mid-sized qualifying companies and less dependence on the largest few. It also means the fund rebalances against price movement, trimming names that have risen and adding to those that have not, which is a source of turnover a cap-weighted fund does not have.
It does not, however, escape sector concentration. Flat weights across many technology holdings still add up to 41% technology. Position-level diversification and sector-level diversification are different things, and JQUA delivers the first while remaining exposed on the second.
Cost, fit and where it misleads
At 0.12%, JQUA is priced close to the cheapest factor funds and well below active management. That is a fair price for a systematic screen applied to a broad universe, and it removes most of the argument that factor investing is too expensive to be worth attempting.
It fits an investor who wants US large-cap exposure with a profitability filter and prefers the resulting portfolio to be spread evenly rather than dominated by six companies. The 1.08% yield makes clear it is not an income vehicle.
Where it misleads is in the word quality itself, which suggests defensiveness. A fund that is 41% technology with semiconductor manufacturers at the top is not a defensive portfolio, whatever the label implies. An investor reaching for stability in a downturn should read the current holdings rather than the strategy name, because the screen's output changes with the market and today it points somewhere unexpected.
JQUA holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
| Rank | Ticker | Company | % of JQUA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MU | Micron Technology Inc | 2.3% | |
| 2 | AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.2% | |
| 3 | AAPL | Apple Inc | 1.9% | |
| 4 | GOOGL | Alphabet Inc Class A | 1.9% | |
| 5 | AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 1.9% | |
| 6 | NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 1.9% | |
| 7 | META | Meta Platforms Inc Class A | 1.7% | |
| 8 | BRK-B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 1.7% | |
| 9 | V | Visa Inc Class A | 1.6% | |
| 10 | JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 1.6% |
How do I invest in JQUA?
There are three common ways to get JQUA exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of JQUA directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so JQUA sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. JQUA trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is JQUA a good buy?
Whether JQUA is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks an index of US large- and mid-cap companies screened for quality characteristics, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is JQUA a buy?
The bottom line on JQUA
JQUA gives you an index of US large- and mid-cap companies screened for quality characteristics exposure in one ticker at a 0.12% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on JQUA
Whether JQUA is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is JQUA a buy?
JQUA yields 1.08% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see JQUA dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like JQUA? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how JQUA fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in JQUA with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how JQUA fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What does the quality screen actually measure?
+
Quality factor indices typically combine profitability, earnings stability and balance sheet strength, favouring companies with high and consistent returns on equity and low leverage. JQUA applies that framework to US large and mid-cap companies. The screen is rules-based and periodic, so a company's inclusion depends on the metrics at the last review rather than on any qualitative judgement.
Why are Micron and AMD the largest holdings in a quality fund?
+
Because semiconductor companies have produced the profitability and growth numbers that quality metrics reward. Micron sits at 2.3% and AMD at 2.2%. A rules-based screen responds to reported financials, not to intuition about which industries feel durable. The outcome is a technology weight of 41%, which is higher than most people expect from a strategy called quality.
Why is no position larger than 2.3%?
+
JQUA does not weight by market capitalisation. It spreads capital more evenly across qualifying companies, so the largest holding is 2.3% and the tenth is 1.6%. That reduces dependence on a few mega caps and gives mid-sized qualifying companies more influence, at the cost of extra turnover as the fund rebalances back toward equal weights.
Is JQUA a defensive holding?
+
The name suggests it, the holdings do not. Technology is 41% of the fund and its two largest positions are semiconductor manufacturers whose earnings move with an industry cycle. Traditional defensive names such as Johnson and Johnson do appear, but at similar weights to everything else. Anyone selecting it for downside protection should look at the current portfolio rather than the label.
How does JQUA differ from other quality factor ETFs?
+
The main structural difference is weighting. Several competing quality funds weight by market value, which concentrates them in the largest qualifying companies. JQUA holds far flatter weights. Screen definitions also vary between providers, so two quality funds can hold different companies while using the same label. Comparing holdings is more informative than comparing names.
Is 0.12% cheap for a factor fund?
+
It is at the low end. Factor strategies once carried fees several times higher, on the argument that the screening added value. Competition has compressed that. At 0.12%, the cost of applying the quality screen is small enough that the decision turns on whether the screen is wanted at all rather than on whether it can be afforded.
Does JQUA overlap with an S&P 500 fund?
+
Substantially, since Apple, Alphabet, Broadcom, NVIDIA, Meta, Berkshire Hathaway, Visa and Johnson and Johnson are all in both. The difference is in weighting rather than in constituents: those companies take up far more of an S&P 500 fund than the 1.6% to 1.9% they occupy here. Adding JQUA changes emphasis more than it changes coverage.
What is the 1.08% yield made of?
+
It is the aggregate of dividends paid by the qualifying companies, and it is low because the screen selects on profitability rather than payout. Highly profitable technology companies retain most of their earnings. The yield is incidental to the strategy, and JQUA is not a sensible choice for an investor whose primary requirement is current income.
What is JQUA's expense ratio?
+
JQUA has an expense ratio of 0.12% per year as of August 2026, charged by J.P. Morgan Asset Management and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $12 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track an index of US large- and mid-cap companies screened for quality characteristics before you choose.
How do I compare JQUA to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. JQUA's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against J.P. Morgan Asset Management's fund page or your broker before investing.