What Is MGV? Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

MGV is Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF, an ETF that tracks a Morningstar mega-cap value index at a 0.05% expense ratio. Value funds are supposed to be predictable in shape: banks, energy, healthcare and staples, with technology thin on the ground. MGV mostly fits that description, with financials at 23%, healthcare at 17% and consumer staples at 11%. The exception is its largest holding. Micron sits at 6.1%, more than half again the size of JPMorgan at 3.9%, because value screens classify on price relative to fundamentals and a cyclical semiconductor company can pass them. Vanguard charges 0.05% on $13.3B, with a 1.86% yield.

Ticker
MGV
Issuer
Vanguard
Tracks
a Morningstar mega-cap value index
Expense ratio
0.05%
AUM
$13.3B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
1.86%
Inception
2008

MGV is issued by Vanguard and tracks a Morningstar mega-cap value index. It charges a 0.05% expense ratio, holds approximately $13.3B in assets under management, yields about 1.86%, and launched in 2008.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

How a chipmaker becomes the largest value holding

Value indices do not screen by industry. They screen on measures such as price relative to book value, earnings, sales or cash flow, and any company whose price is low against those measures can qualify regardless of what it does. Semiconductor manufacturers are episodic candidates for exactly this reason: their earnings swing hard with the memory and logic cycles, and at certain points in that cycle the shares screen as cheap even after a substantial run in the price.

The result here is Micron at 6.1%, well clear of JPMorgan at 3.9% and Berkshire Hathaway at 3.3%. Technology overall is 18% of the fund, which is higher than most people expect from something labelled value, and much of that comes from Micron plus Cisco at 2.0%.

This is not a defect. It is what a rules-based value screen produces when applied honestly rather than to a fixed list of defensive industries. But it does mean the fund's largest single-name risk is a cyclical manufacturer, not a bank or a consumer staples business, and that changes the fund's behaviour in a downturn from what the category label implies.

The rest of the portfolio is more conventional

Below the top position, MGV reads the way a mega-cap value fund should. JPMorgan, Berkshire Hathaway, Johnson and Johnson, ExxonMobil, Walmart, Caterpillar, AbbVie and Costco fill out the top ten, spanning banking, insurance, pharmaceuticals, energy, retail and heavy machinery. Financials at 23% is the largest sector, with industrials at 14% and consumer staples at 11%.

The mega-cap restriction matters as much as the value screen. This is not a fund of forgotten small companies trading below liquidation value. It is a fund of very large, mostly well-known businesses that happen to trade at lower multiples than the market's growth leaders. That makes it a very different proposition from deep-value or small-cap value strategies, which draw from a much more distressed universe.

The 1.86% yield follows from the holdings. It is meaningfully above what a broad large-cap fund pays, because banks, pharmaceuticals, energy and staples distribute more of their earnings, and meaningfully below what a dedicated high-dividend fund targets, because the screen selects on valuation rather than on payout.

Cost, overlap and the wrong uses

At 0.05%, MGV is among the cheapest ways to buy a value tilt in US large caps. Cost is close to irrelevant as a differentiator at that level, which moves the decision entirely onto whether you want the tilt at all.

The overlap question is the practical one. Anyone holding a total-market or S&P 500 fund already owns every company in MGV, at lower weights. Adding MGV does not add companies, it changes the proportions, shifting money from the technology leaders toward financials, healthcare and industrials. That is a legitimate thing to do deliberately and a confusing thing to do accidentally.

MGV is the wrong tool for someone who wants income specifically, since a dividend-screened fund targets that directly and yields more. It is also the wrong tool for anyone seeking classic value exposure through smaller, cheaper companies, because the mega-cap restriction removes precisely that part of the market. And it will not diversify away from semiconductors, given where its largest position currently sits.

MGV holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of MGV
1MUMicron Technology Inc6.1%
2JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co3.9%
3BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Class B3.3%
4JNJJohnson & Johnson2.9%
5XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp2.7%
6WMTWalmart Inc2.3%
7CATCaterpillar Inc2.3%
8ABBVAbbVie Inc2.1%
9CSCOCisco Systems Inc2.0%
10COSTCostco Wholesale Corp2.0%

How do I invest in MGV?

There are three common ways to get MGV exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of MGV directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so MGV sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. MGV trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is MGV a good buy?

Whether MGV is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks a Morningstar mega-cap value index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is MGV a buy?

The bottom line on MGV

MGV gives you a Morningstar mega-cap value index exposure in one ticker at a 0.05% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on MGV

Whether MGV is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is MGV a buy?

MGV yields 1.86% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see MGV dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like MGV? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how MGV fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in MGV with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MGV fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why is Micron the largest holding in a value fund?

+

Value indices screen on price relative to fundamentals such as book value, earnings and cash flow, not on industry. Semiconductor manufacturers with cyclical earnings can qualify at certain points in their cycle, and Micron currently does, at a 6.1% weight. It is a genuine output of the methodology rather than an error, but it does mean the fund's biggest single-name exposure is cyclical rather than defensive.

How is MGV different from a broad large-cap fund?

+

It holds the same kinds of companies in different proportions. A broad fund is led by the largest technology and communication services names. MGV shifts weight toward financials at 23%, healthcare at 17%, industrials at 14% and staples at 11%. It adds no companies you would not otherwise own if you hold a total-market fund. It changes the balance between them, which is the entire point of a tilt.

What does mega cap mean here?

+

The universe is restricted to the largest US companies by market value before the value screen is applied. That excludes mid-caps and small caps entirely. It matters because most academic work on value investing draws from a much broader universe including smaller, more distressed companies. A mega-cap value fund captures a milder version of the tilt, made up of large, established, widely held businesses.

Is the 1.86% yield high?

+

It is higher than a broad US large-cap fund, because banks, pharmaceutical companies, energy producers and consumer staples pay out more of their earnings than technology companies do. It is lower than a dedicated dividend fund, because the selection screen looks at valuation rather than payout. If income is the objective, a dividend-screened fund addresses it more directly than a value fund does.

Is 0.05% competitive?

+

Yes. It sits at the low end of what any factor-tilted equity fund charges, and at that level cost is unlikely to be the deciding factor between competing value funds. The more consequential differences are in index methodology: which valuation measures are used, how often the index rebalances, and whether the universe is mega cap only or extends further down the size range.

Does MGV protect against technology drawdowns?

+

Only partially. Technology is 18% of the fund, and the largest single position is a semiconductor manufacturer at 6.1%. That is far less technology exposure than a broad index carries, but it is not the absence of exposure that the value label sometimes implies. Anyone holding MGV specifically to offset technology concentration elsewhere should look at the actual weights rather than the category name.

How does MGV compare with a high dividend fund?

+

They select on different things and end up with different portfolios. A dividend fund ranks companies by payout and typically yields more, with heavier weightings in utilities, staples and telecoms. A value fund ranks on valuation and can hold companies paying little or nothing, including cyclicals. The two overlap in banks and pharmaceuticals but diverge sharply elsewhere, so they are not interchangeable.

What happens to the Micron weight if the memory cycle turns?

+

The index will reweight mechanically. If the share price falls, the position size falls with it. If the company no longer screens as cheap on the index's valuation measures, it can be removed at the next reconstitution, and if it falls out of the mega-cap universe it leaves regardless. None of this involves a manager's judgement, which is worth understanding before treating any single weight as permanent.

What is MGV's expense ratio?

+

MGV has an expense ratio of 0.05% per year as of August 2026, charged by Vanguard and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $5 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track a Morningstar mega-cap value index before you choose.

How do I compare MGV to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. MGV's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Vanguard's fund page or your broker before investing.