What Is MOAT? VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

MOAT is VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF, an ETF that tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index at a 0.46% expense ratio. MOAT buys companies Morningstar's analysts rate as having a wide economic moat, then holds the ones trading at the largest discount to those analysts' fair value estimates. The effect is visible in the holdings: Masco, a building products manufacturer, is the largest position at 2.9%, and the ten largest are packed between 2.4% and 2.9%. VanEck launched it in 2012 and it holds $11.6B at 0.46%, which is expensive for a large blend fund. The yield is 1.35%. It looks nothing like an S&P 500 fund and is not meant to.

Ticker
MOAT
Issuer
VanEck
Tracks
the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
Expense ratio
0.46%
AUM
$11.6B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
1.35%
Inception
2012

MOAT is issued by VanEck and tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It charges a 0.46% expense ratio, holds approximately $11.6B in assets under management, yields about 1.35%, and launched in 2012.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Two screens, applied in order

The first screen is qualitative. Morningstar's equity analysts assign moat ratings based on durable competitive advantages such as switching costs, network effects, cost advantage, intangible assets and efficient scale. Only the wide-moat group, companies judged able to defend excess returns for a long period, is eligible. That judgement comes from human analysts, not from a formula, which is unusual for an index-tracking product.

The second screen is valuation. From the eligible set, the index takes those trading furthest below Morningstar's own fair value estimates and weights them roughly equally. This is why the top of the fund is so flat, and why the names there are frequently unloved: Masco at 2.9%, Kenvue at 2.6%, Bristol-Myers Squibb at 2.5% and Zimmer Biomet at 2.4% are not the companies that lead a momentum-driven market.

The consequence people underestimate is turnover. When a holding rallies toward fair value, it is sold and replaced with something cheaper, on a staggered rebalancing schedule. MOAT is systematically selling what has worked and buying what has not, within a quality-constrained universe.

Why it diverges from the S&P 500

Two things break the resemblance. Weighting is near-equal rather than by market capitalisation, so a $30B company and a $300B company can carry the same 2.5%. And the valuation screen actively excludes expensive companies, which in recent years has meant excluding several of the largest US technology businesses at exactly the times they were driving the index.

The stated sector mix is technology 31%, consumer staples 18% and healthcare 18%, with consumer discretionary at 11% and industrials at 10%. That staples and healthcare weight, at 36% combined, is far above the broad market and is the more informative number. Brown-Forman, Kenvue, Mondelez, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Danaher and Zimmer Biomet are all top-ten positions.

Anyone buying MOAT expecting a large-blend fund that behaves like the market will be repeatedly surprised, in both directions. Divergence is the mechanism working, not a tracking failure.

The fee and the fair-value dependency

At 0.46%, MOAT costs several times what a broad US index fund does and roughly double a typical factor fund. The fee pays for the analyst research underlying the moat ratings and the fair value estimates, which cannot be automated from public filings. Whether that is worth paying depends entirely on whether those estimates add something, and there is no way to verify that from the fee schedule.

The dependency is worth stating plainly: the portfolio is a direct expression of one research house's opinions about competitive advantage and intrinsic value. If those opinions are systematically wrong about a sector or a period, the fund inherits that error. This is closer to outsourced active management wrapped in an index than to a rules-based factor product.

It is a poor fit as a sole US holding, given the concentration into 40 or so names and the sector skew. It fits more naturally as a quality-and-valuation sleeve beside a cap-weighted core, where its divergence is the reason for holding it rather than a problem to explain.

MOAT holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of MOAT
1MASMasco Corp2.9%
2ABNBAirbnb Inc Ordinary Shares - Class A2.6%
3BF-BBrown-Forman Corp Registered Shs -B- Non Vtg2.6%
4KVUEKenvue Inc2.6%
5BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co2.5%
6PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc2.5%
7DHRDanaher Corp2.4%
8ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc2.4%
9MDLZMondelez International Inc Class A2.4%
10SCHWCharles Schwab Corp2.4%

How do I invest in MOAT?

There are three common ways to get MOAT exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of MOAT directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so MOAT sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. MOAT trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is MOAT a good buy?

Whether MOAT is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is MOAT a buy?

The bottom line on MOAT

MOAT gives you the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.46% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on MOAT

Whether MOAT is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is MOAT a buy?

MOAT yields 1.35% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see MOAT dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like MOAT? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how MOAT fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in MOAT with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MOAT fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is an economic moat?

+

It is a durable structural advantage that lets a company earn returns above its cost of capital for an extended period without competitors eroding them. Morningstar's analysts identify five sources: switching costs, network effects, cost advantage, intangible assets such as brands and patents, and efficient scale. A wide moat rating means they expect that advantage to hold for a long time, not merely a few years.

Why is Masco the largest holding?

+

Because the index weights by discount to fair value, not by company size. Masco at 2.9% is there because Morningstar rates it as wide-moat and its shares were trading well below the analysts' estimate at the last rebalance. Position sizes in MOAT tell you which wide-moat companies looked cheapest, not which companies are largest or most important.

Why does MOAT charge 0.46% when index funds cost a tenth of that?

+

The moat ratings and fair value estimates come from analysts covering companies individually. That research cannot be derived from a data feed, and the fee funds it. It is best understood as the cost of an active research process delivered in index form. Whether it is worth paying is the central question for anyone considering the fund.

How different is MOAT from the S&P 500?

+

Substantially. It holds around 40 companies at near-equal weights, versus 500 weighted by size, and the valuation screen tends to exclude the most expensive large technology names. Consumer staples and healthcare together are 36% of the fund, far above their broad-market weights. Expect long stretches of divergence in both directions.

Does the fund trade often?

+

More than a plain index fund. When a holding rises toward Morningstar's fair value estimate it is replaced by a cheaper wide-moat company, and the index rebalances on a staggered schedule through the year. That turnover is the strategy operating as designed, though it can generate more taxable distributions than a low-turnover index fund in a taxable account.

Is MOAT a value fund?

+

It is categorised as large blend, and that is fair. It applies a valuation screen, but only within a universe pre-filtered for quality, so it will not hold the cheap, structurally weak businesses a conventional value screen picks up. The output tends to land between quality and value rather than sitting squarely in either camp.

Can a wide-moat rating be wrong?

+

Yes, and it has been. Competitive advantages erode, sometimes faster than any analyst expects, and technology shifts have retired moats that looked permanent. A rating is a forecast about the future durability of an advantage. MOAT concentrates roughly 40 such forecasts, so being wrong on a few of them has a visible effect at 2.5% per position.

Should MOAT be a core US holding?

+

It is generally used as a sleeve rather than a core. Around 40 near-equally weighted names with heavy staples and healthcare exposure is a specific portfolio, not a market proxy, and its dependency on one research house's judgements is a concentrated bet on a process. Sized as a complement to a cap-weighted fund, that specificity is the point.

What is MOAT's expense ratio?

+

MOAT has an expense ratio of 0.46% per year as of August 2026, charged by VanEck and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $46 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index before you choose.

How do I compare MOAT to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. MOAT's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against VanEck's fund page or your broker before investing.