NLR Forecast 2026: Price Target, Outlook and What Analysts Expect

Weighting each covered holding's consensus price target by its share of NLR gives an average target 74.3% above current prices. That covers 6 holdings and about 40% of the fund; the rest is either outside the top holdings we track or lacks enough analyst coverage to average.

Read this as the mood of the analysts who cover NLR's largest companies, not as a forecast for the fund. Sell-side targets skew optimistic across the whole market, they run about twelve months, and they tend to follow prices as often as lead them. The earnings column is the steadier input: the covered holdings are expected to grow earnings about +27% on a weighted basis next fiscal year, which is what a stock fund's price has to be justified by over time.

At a yield of about 3.06% as of October 2026, a $10,000 position in NLR would pay roughly $306 a year. That is the current run rate; actual distributions change with what the holdings pay. For the payout history and schedule, see NLR dividend: yield and schedule.

• Year to date: -29.1% price change (to 2026-10-16).
• Past year: -37.7% price change.
• Three-year average: +14.2% a year.
• Five-year average: +13.7% a year.
• 52-week range: $91.88 to $165.21, against a last price of $94.34.
• Three-year beta: 1.54 (1.00 moves in line with the market; higher swings more).

History tells you how NLR has behaved, which is useful for sizing a position. It does not tell you what comes next, and periods of strong returns are often followed by weaker ones.

No published one. Analysts do not forecast ETFs, and the targets on the companies inside a fund run about twelve months. Any 2030 figure for NLR is a past return projected forward.

What is certain is the cost. At 0.52% a year, about $52 on every $10,000 every year, it comes off whatever the holdings earn, in good years and bad. Across funds that track similar things, that is one of the few differences you can know in advance.

NLR's three largest holdings, Constellation Energy Corporation, Cameco Corporation, Public Service Enterprise Group, make up about 24% of the fund, so news about them moves it most. Beyond those names, it behaves like MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index: broad market direction, interest rates and earnings growth across its holdings decide the result.

The case for and against owning it, including concentration and overlap with funds you may already hold, is on is NLR a good investment?

For a stock fund, two things move the long-run result: whether the companies it holds grow their earnings as analysts expect, and how much investors are willing to pay for those earnings. The first is what the estimates on this page describe. The second shifts with interest rates and sentiment and can swamp the first over a year or two. A cut to the earnings outlook for NLR's largest holdings, or a rise in long-term rates that makes future profits worth less today, are the two developments most likely to pull the fund below what the targets imply.

How to read this page: the analyst figures describe expectations for the holdings, not for the fund; the yield describes current income, not total return; the history describes one path through the market, not the next one. The cost is the only line that is known in advance.

• What is NLR? (holdings, cost, and the themes it covers)
• Is NLR a good investment?
• NLR dividend: yield and schedule