What Is PRF? Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
PRF is Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF, an ETF that tracks the RAFI US 1000 Index at a 0.34% expense ratio. PRF weights US companies by fundamental measures, sales, cash flow, dividends and book value, instead of by market capitalisation. The holdings list shows what that does. Apple leads at 4.1% and Alphabet follows at 3.7%, but Intel sits third at 2.8%, above Microsoft and Amazon at 2.1% each, and Exxon Mobil at 1.7% outranks Meta at 1.4%. Invesco has run it since 2005 at 0.34%, with $9.7B in assets and a 1.37% yield. It is categorised as large value while holding most of the largest US technology companies.
PRF is issued by Invesco and tracks the RAFI US 1000 Index. It charges a 0.34% expense ratio, holds approximately $9.7B in assets under management, yields about 1.37%, and launched in 2005.
What fundamental weighting changes
In a cap-weighted index a company's weight is its share price multiplied by shares outstanding. If the market pays more for a stock, its weight rises automatically. RAFI severs that link, sizing positions on averaged accounting measures instead: sales, cash flow, dividends paid and book value. Share price enters only when the index rebalances back to those figures.
The mechanical result is a contrarian rebalance. A company whose share price doubles while its revenue and book value stay flat gets trimmed back at the next rebalance, and one whose price has fallen without a matching decline in its accounts is topped up. This is where the small value tilt in a fund holding megacap technology comes from.
Intel at 2.8% is the clearest illustration. By market value it is a fraction of Microsoft, but its revenue, book value and asset base remain very large, and fundamental weighting sizes it accordingly. The same logic puts Exxon Mobil at 1.7%, above Meta.
It is not a value fund in the usual sense
A conventional value index excludes expensive companies. PRF does not exclude anything: it holds roughly a thousand US companies and simply weights them differently. Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta are all present, at weights well below their cap-weighted levels but far from absent, and technology is still the largest sector at 22%.
The value character therefore comes from the weighting, not from the holdings. Financials at 16% and healthcare at 13% carry more weight than they would in a cap-weighted index, and the sector spread is flatter overall. The ten largest positions total 22.7%, meaningfully less concentrated than the top of the US market has been in recent years.
The trade-off is straightforward and should be expected. When a handful of very large companies drive the market, a fund that deliberately underweights them relative to price will lag. When leadership broadens or reverses, the same construction works in the other direction.
Cost, tax and the alternatives
At 0.34%, PRF costs many times a plain large-value index fund and around four times a low-cost broad-market ETF. The rebalancing that defines the strategy also generates turnover, which matters in a taxable account, though the ETF structure absorbs much of that through in-kind redemption.
Two decades of history is genuinely useful here: the fund launched in 2005 and has operated through the financial crisis, a long growth-led bull market and the 2022 drawdown. That is more cycle evidence than most factor products can offer, which is worth something when assessing whether the approach behaves as described.
It suits an investor who wants a value tilt without abandoning the largest companies entirely. It is a poor fit for anyone seeking a clean growth-free portfolio, and unnecessary for anyone whose goal is simply cheap broad US exposure, where the fee gap is large and compounds. The comparison worth making is not against the market but against a plain large-value index fund, since that is the alternative way to buy the same tilt for a great deal less.
PRF holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
How do I invest in PRF?
There are three common ways to get PRF exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of PRF directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so PRF sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. PRF trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is PRF a good buy?
Whether PRF is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the RAFI US 1000 Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is PRF a buy?
The bottom line on PRF
PRF gives you the RAFI US 1000 Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.34% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on PRF
Whether PRF is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is PRF a buy?
PRF yields 1.37% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see PRF dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like PRF? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how PRF fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in PRF with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how PRF fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What does RAFI mean?
+
RAFI stands for Research Affiliates Fundamental Index, the methodology developed by Rob Arnott's firm in the mid-2000s. It sizes index positions using accounting measures, averaged sales, cash flow, dividends and book value, rather than market capitalisation. The intent is to stop share price from determining weight, so a rising valuation does not automatically increase a company's share of the index.
Why is Intel weighted above Microsoft?
+
Because weight follows the accounts, not the share price. Intel's revenue, book value and asset base are large enough to earn 2.8% under the RAFI formula, while Microsoft's 2.1% reflects its fundamental footprint rather than its market value. In a cap-weighted index the ordering would be reversed by a wide margin. This inversion is the strategy, not an error.
Is PRF really a value fund?
+
It is classified as large value and behaves with a value tilt, but it does not exclude growth companies. Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta are all held, technology is the largest sector at 22%, and the tilt comes from weighting rather than from screening. Investors wanting a portfolio with no expensive companies in it need a conventional value index instead.
How does PRF compare with a plain large-value ETF?
+
A conventional large-value fund screens on valuation ratios and excludes what fails the test, so it typically holds far less technology. PRF holds the full large-cap universe and reweights it. The two can diverge considerably in any given year. PRF also costs 0.34% against single-digit basis points for the cheapest value index funds.
Does the rebalancing hurt tax efficiency?
+
Turnover is higher than a plain index fund, because positions are reset to fundamental weights on a schedule and price moves between rebalances are systematically reversed. The ETF structure mitigates much of this by using in-kind redemptions to move appreciated shares out. It remains less tax-efficient than a low-turnover market-cap index fund in a taxable account.
What happens to PRF when megacaps lead the market?
+
It tends to lag. By construction the fund holds the largest technology companies at weights below their market-cap share, so a market driven by those companies produces a shortfall. Long stretches of that pattern have occurred and are consistent with the design working as described. The relationship reverses when market leadership broadens.
Why is the yield only 1.37%?
+
Dividends are one of the four inputs to the weighting, which lifts income-paying companies somewhat, but the fund is not screening for yield. It still holds Apple, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta, which distribute little or nothing relative to their size. The result is a yield modestly above the broad US market, not a dividend-fund level of income.
How long has this approach been tested in live markets?
+
PRF launched in 2005, so it has now run through the 2008 financial crisis, a long growth-led expansion, the 2020 shock and the 2022 drawdown. That is unusually deep live history for a factor product, most of which were launched after their backtests looked good. It does not guarantee anything about the future, but it is real evidence rather than simulation.
What is PRF's expense ratio?
+
PRF has an expense ratio of 0.34% per year as of August 2026, charged by Invesco and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $34 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the RAFI US 1000 Index before you choose.
How do I compare PRF to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. PRF's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Invesco's fund page or your broker before investing.