What Is PVAL? Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
PVAL is Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.55% expense ratio. PVAL is a concentrated, actively managed large-cap value portfolio now run under the Franklin Templeton umbrella. The word Focused in the name is accurate: ten positions account for roughly 35% of the fund and the largest, Cisco Systems, sits at 6.0%. It holds $11.9B, charges 0.55% and yields 0.97%. The value label describes how the manager selects, not what the sector map looks like: technology is 17% of the fund and the holdings include Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and AMD alongside Exxon Mobil, Citigroup and Freeport-McMoRan.
PVAL is issued by Franklin Templeton Investments and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.55% expense ratio, holds approximately $11.9B in assets under management, yields about 0.97%, and launched in 2021.
Value defined by price paid, not by sector
A screen-based value fund sorts on ratios and ends up owning banks, energy, utilities and consumer staples. PVAL does not look like that. Alphabet at 3.3%, Amazon at 2.9%, Microsoft at 2.9% and AMD at 3.1% all sit in the top ten, and Hilton Worldwide at 2.8% is a full-price hotel operator by most conventional measures.
The distinction is between value as a sector outcome and value as a judgement about what a specific business is worth relative to its price. An active manager can decide that a large technology company trades below its own worth and buy it, while a mechanical value screen would never surface it. Whether that judgement proves right is unknowable in advance and nothing here should be read as a view on it.
The practical consequence is that PVAL will not behave like a value index fund. In periods when large-cap technology drives the market, a portfolio holding Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and AMD is positioned very differently from one holding only traditional value sectors, and the difference cuts both ways.
Concentration and what it implies
Cisco Systems at 6.0% is a large single position for a fund of this size. Citigroup at 4.6%, Exxon Mobil at 3.6%, AMD at 3.1% and Seagate Technology at 3.0% follow. A top ten worth around 35% means individual company outcomes matter to the fund's results in a way they do not for a diversified index product.
Sector weights are more balanced than the top ten suggests: financials 19%, technology 17%, healthcare 12%, industrials 11% and consumer discretionary 10%. So the concentration is at the stock level rather than the sector level, which is the profile you would expect from a manager picking specific businesses rather than expressing a sector view.
Seagate at 3.0% and AMD at 3.1% together give the fund meaningful exposure to data-storage and processor demand, and Freeport-McMoRan at 2.9% adds copper. These are cyclical positions. A concentrated portfolio of cyclicals moves more than a broad one, in both directions.
Fee, yield and fit
At 0.55%, PVAL costs roughly ten times what the largest passive large-value ETFs charge. That is the standard cost of an active mandate in ETF form, and the case for paying it rests entirely on believing this specific team adds value net of the fee. There is no data on this page that speaks to whether it has, and none should be inferred.
The 0.97% yield is unusually low for a fund carrying a value label. Investors who reach for large-cap value specifically for income will find that PVAL does not deliver it, because its holdings skew toward businesses that retain earnings rather than distribute them. A dividend-focused fund is a different instrument with a different purpose.
The fund suits someone who wants active large-cap value management, accepts stock-level concentration, and is not buying value as a proxy for income. It is the wrong tool for a low-cost core allocation, for anyone who wants a portfolio that behaves like the value index, or for an investor whose main objective is current yield.
PVAL holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
| Rank | Ticker | Company | % of PVAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc | 6.0% | |
| 2 | C | Citigroup Inc | 4.6% | |
| 3 | XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp | 3.6% | |
| 4 | GOOGL | Alphabet Inc Class A | 3.3% | |
| 5 | AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.1% | |
| 6 | STX | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 3.0% | |
| 7 | AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 2.9% | |
| 8 | MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 2.9% | |
| 9 | FCX | Freeport-McMoRan Inc | 2.9% | |
| 10 | HLT | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc | 2.8% |
How do I invest in PVAL?
There are three common ways to get PVAL exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of PVAL directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so PVAL sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. PVAL trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is PVAL a good buy?
Whether PVAL is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is PVAL a buy?
The bottom line on PVAL
PVAL gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.55% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on PVAL
Whether PVAL is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is PVAL a buy?
PVAL yields 0.97% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see PVAL dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like PVAL? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how PVAL fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in PVAL with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how PVAL fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
Is PVAL actively managed?
+
Yes. There is no index to replicate. A management team selects the holdings and sets the weights, which is why the portfolio looks unlike any mechanical value screen and why the fee is 0.55% rather than the few basis points a passive value fund charges. Holdings can change at the manager's discretion, so any snapshot of positions describes a moment rather than a fixed rule.
Why does a value fund hold Alphabet, Amazon and Microsoft?
+
Because the manager assesses value against their estimate of what a business is worth, not against a sector classification. An active manager can conclude that a large technology company trades below its intrinsic value; a ratio-based screen cannot reach that conclusion. This makes PVAL's sector profile diverge from value index funds, and it is the main thing to understand before comparing them.
How concentrated is PVAL?
+
The ten largest positions are roughly 35% of the fund, led by Cisco Systems at 6.0% and Citigroup at 4.6%. That is concentrated by the standards of index products and normal for a portfolio with Focused in its name. It means individual company results move the fund noticeably, which raises the range of possible outcomes relative to a diversified alternative.
Why is PVAL's dividend yield only 0.97%?
+
Because the manager selects on valuation rather than on distribution. Several of the largest holdings retain most of their earnings, and the portfolio includes technology and consumer names that pay little. Value and income are frequently conflated, but they are different objectives, and this fund pursues the first without targeting the second.
Is 0.55% expensive for PVAL?
+
It is high relative to passive large-value ETFs, which charge a small fraction of that, and unremarkable for an actively managed equity fund. The fee is a certain cost paid against an uncertain benefit. Anyone considering it should be clear that they are buying a specific team's judgement, since a cheaper index alternative covering the same market segment is readily available.
What does Focused mean in the fund's name?
+
It signals a deliberately limited number of holdings. Rather than owning several hundred companies, the manager runs a shorter list with larger individual weights, so each decision carries more consequence. It is a statement about portfolio construction, not about a particular industry or theme, and it is the main reason the fund's results will diverge from a broad value benchmark.
Does PVAL hold energy and materials?
+
Yes, though less than a traditional value screen would produce. Exxon Mobil is 3.6% of the fund and Freeport-McMoRan is 2.9%. Neither energy nor materials appears among the five largest sectors, which are financials, technology, healthcare, industrials and consumer discretionary. The cyclical exposure is present but sits alongside a large technology allocation rather than dominating.
How does PVAL compare with a passive large-value ETF?
+
Three differences matter: cost, concentration and composition. PVAL charges more, holds far fewer names at larger weights, and includes large technology companies a value index would exclude. The result is a fund that can diverge substantially from the value category in either direction. If you want the value factor as commonly defined, an index fund delivers it more literally.
What is PVAL's expense ratio?
+
PVAL has an expense ratio of 0.55% per year as of August 2026, charged by Franklin Templeton Investments and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $55 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.
How do I compare PVAL to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. PVAL's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Franklin Templeton Investments's fund page or your broker before investing.