What Is RSPT? Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
RSPT is Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF, an ETF that tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index at a 0.40% expense ratio. RSPT holds the technology companies in the S&P 500 and gives each an equal target weight rather than sizing by market capitalisation. In a sector where the largest members dwarf the rest, that decision changes the fund entirely. No holding exceeds 1.9% and the ten largest add to under 18% of assets. Weights drift between scheduled resets, and the current top holdings are dominated by semiconductor and hardware companies. The fund charges 0.40%, holds $5.7B, yields 0.25%, and has run since 2006.
RSPT is issued by Invesco and tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index. It charges a 0.40% expense ratio, holds approximately $5.7B in assets under management, yields about 0.25%, and launched in 2006.
The point of the fund is what it refuses to do
A cap-weighted technology fund is largely a bet on a handful of the biggest companies. Equal weighting rejects that structure. Every constituent gets the same target allocation at each reset, so Intel is sized like the sector's largest member and a smaller software company is sized like Broadcom. Corning at 1.9%, Applied Materials at 1.9% and KLA at 1.8% currently lead, and the tenth holding is 1.7%.
The consequence is that this fund is driven by the breadth of the sector rather than by its leaders. If technology gains are concentrated in a few very large companies, RSPT captures much less of that than a cap-weighted fund does. If gains are spread across the sector, it captures more. That is the trade in a sentence, and it is the only reason to choose this structure.
It also means the fund carries real weight in companies a cap-weighted product barely touches. Intel at 1.7% and Western Digital at 1.7% sit at roughly the same size as Palo Alto Networks. Whether that is appealing depends entirely on whether you think the sector's smaller and more troubled members deserve that prominence.
What counts as technology, and what does not
The S&P classification system is narrower than the everyday use of the word. Alphabet, Meta and Netflix are classified as communication services. Amazon and Tesla are consumer discretionary. And since the 2023 revision to the sector definitions, payment processors including Visa and Mastercard were moved into financials. None of them appears in this fund.
What remains is chips, chip equipment, hardware and software. The current top holdings show how heavily that leans toward the semiconductor complex: Applied Materials, KLA, Teradyne, SanDisk, Lam Research, Intel, Western Digital and Micron are all in the top ten, alongside Corning and Palo Alto Networks. Sector data shows technology at 99% of assets, which is what a sector fund should look like.
The concentration in semiconductors is partly a consequence of drift. Between scheduled resets, holdings that have appreciated most carry the largest weights, so a top ten crowded with memory and equipment names reflects recent performance in those industries rather than a deliberate choice by the index. At the next reset those weights are pulled back toward equal.
Rebalancing, cost and income
Resetting every holding back to an equal weight requires selling what has risen and buying what has lagged, on a repeating schedule. This is the mirror image of cap weighting, which needs no trades at all because weights update themselves with prices. The rebalancing imposes turnover, and turnover has costs that do not appear in the expense ratio and can generate taxable distributions in a taxable account.
At 0.40%, RSPT costs considerably more than a cap-weighted technology sector fund. The equal weight rule is simple, so the fee is not buying research; it is buying the mechanics of running the rebalance and the licensing of the index. In a sector fund held as a deliberate tilt, that cost compounds against whatever advantage the weighting scheme provides.
The 0.25% yield is negligible and follows from the holdings, since technology companies distribute little. Nobody holds RSPT for income. It is a satellite position for someone who wants technology exposure without the megacap concentration that dominates the cap-weighted alternative, and it is a poor match for anyone who wants their technology allocation to reflect where the sector's value actually sits.
RSPT holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
How do I invest in RSPT?
There are three common ways to get RSPT exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of RSPT directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so RSPT sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. RSPT trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is RSPT a good buy?
Whether RSPT is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is RSPT a buy?
The bottom line on RSPT
RSPT gives you the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.40% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on RSPT
Whether RSPT is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is RSPT a buy?
RSPT yields 0.25% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see RSPT dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like RSPT? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how RSPT fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in RSPT with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how RSPT fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What does equal weight mean here?
+
Every company in the S&P 500 technology sector receives the same target allocation, regardless of size. At each scheduled reset the fund trims positions that have grown and adds to those that have shrunk, returning everything to parity. Between resets the weights drift with performance, which is why the current largest holding is 1.9% and the tenth is 1.7% rather than all being identical.
Does RSPT hold Nvidia and Microsoft?
+
They are members of the S&P 500 technology sector, so they are in the fund, but at roughly the same weight as every other constituent rather than at the dominant weights a cap-weighted fund assigns them. That is the entire purpose of the structure. Neither appears in the current top ten, which means both have lagged the semiconductor equipment and memory names since the last reset.
Why are the top holdings almost all semiconductor companies?
+
Because weights drift between resets. Applied Materials, KLA, Teradyne, SanDisk, Lam Research, Intel, Western Digital and Micron all sit in the top ten, which tells you those names have appreciated more than the rest of the sector recently. It is a reading of what has happened rather than a design choice. The next scheduled reset pulls them back toward the sector average.
Which large technology companies are excluded?
+
Alphabet, Meta and Netflix sit in communication services under the S&P classification. Amazon and Tesla are consumer discretionary. Since the 2023 revision, Visa, Mastercard and other payment processors moved to financials. None of them is in this fund. The technology sector as defined here covers semiconductors, equipment, hardware and software, which is a narrower set than most people picture.
How does RSPT compare with a cap-weighted technology fund?
+
It holds the same companies in very different proportions. A cap-weighted sector fund puts a large share of assets in a few of the biggest names, so its results depend on them. RSPT spreads exposure evenly, with no holding above 1.9% and the top ten under 18% of assets. The choice between them is a view on whether sector gains will be concentrated or broad.
Does the rebalancing create costs?
+
Yes, though not in the expense ratio. Returning every holding to an equal weight requires selling winners and buying laggards on a repeating schedule, and each trade incurs spreads and market impact. In a taxable account the realised gains can also generate distributions. A cap-weighted fund avoids this almost entirely, because prices update its weights automatically without any transaction.
Is 0.40% expensive for a sector fund?
+
It is toward the higher end. Cap-weighted technology sector funds are available for considerably less, and the equal weight rule involves no analysis that would justify a research premium. What the fee covers is index licensing and the operational work of the rebalance. Over a long holding period the difference against a cheaper sector fund is a real hurdle for the weighting scheme to overcome.
What does the 0.25% yield mean?
+
Very little in practical terms. Technology companies typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, and the ones that pay dividends generally pay small ones. The trailing 0.25% figure is what remains after the fund's costs. RSPT is a growth-oriented sector holding and should be assessed on its exposure rather than on its distributions.
What is RSPT's expense ratio?
+
RSPT has an expense ratio of 0.40% per year as of August 2026, charged by Invesco and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $40 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index before you choose.
How do I compare RSPT to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. RSPT's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Invesco's fund page or your broker before investing.