What Is RSPT? Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

A cap-weighted technology fund is largely a bet on a handful of the biggest companies. Equal weighting rejects that structure. Every constituent gets the same target allocation at each reset, so Intel is sized like the sector's largest member and a smaller software company is sized like Broadcom. As of October 2026 Everpure at 1.8%, CrowdStrike at 1.7% and Datadog at 1.6% lead, and the tenth holding is 1.5%.

The consequence is that this fund is driven by the breadth of the sector rather than by its leaders. If technology gains are concentrated in a few very large companies, RSPT captures much less of that than a cap-weighted fund does. If gains are spread across the sector, it captures more. That is the trade in a sentence, and it is the only reason to choose this structure. In 2026 the breadth has been there: as of 2026-10-16 the fund's price was up 39.4% year to date and 42.8% over one year, helped by the run in memory and equipment stocks that dominated its top ten in the summer.

It also means the fund carries real weight in companies a cap-weighted product barely touches. Intel at 1.5% sits at roughly the same size as Palo Alto Networks and AMD. Whether that is appealing depends entirely on whether you think the sector's smaller and more troubled members deserve that prominence.

The S&P classification system is narrower than the everyday use of the word. Alphabet, Meta and Netflix are classified as communication services. Amazon and Tesla are consumer discretionary. And since the 2023 revision to the sector definitions, payment processors including Visa and Mastercard were moved into financials. None of them appears in this fund.

What remains is chips, chip equipment, hardware and software. In the summer the top holdings leaned heavily toward the semiconductor complex: Applied Materials, KLA, Teradyne, SanDisk, Lam Research, Intel, Western Digital and Micron were all in the top ten, alongside Corning and Palo Alto Networks. As of October 2026 the top ten instead leans toward security and software, with CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Datadog and Cadence, plus storage makers Everpure and NetApp and chipmakers AMD, Intel and Marvell. Sector data shows technology at 100% of assets, which is what a sector fund should look like.

The concentration in semiconductors is partly a consequence of drift. Between scheduled resets, holdings that have appreciated most carry the largest weights, so a top ten crowded with memory and equipment names, as it was in the summer, reflects recent performance in those industries rather than a deliberate choice by the index. At each reset those weights are pulled back toward equal, which is why the October list looks so different.

Resetting every holding back to an equal weight requires selling what has risen and buying what has lagged, on a repeating schedule. This is the mirror image of cap weighting, which needs no trades at all because weights update themselves with prices. The rebalancing imposes turnover, and turnover has costs that do not appear in the expense ratio and can generate taxable distributions in a taxable account.

At 0.40%, RSPT costs considerably more than a cap-weighted technology sector fund. The equal weight rule is simple, so the fee is not buying research; it is buying the mechanics of running the rebalance and the licensing of the index. In a sector fund held as a deliberate tilt, that cost compounds against whatever advantage the weighting scheme provides.

The 0.23% yield is negligible and follows from the holdings, since technology companies distribute little. Nobody holds RSPT for income. It is a satellite position for someone who wants technology exposure without the megacap concentration that dominates the cap-weighted alternative, and it is a poor match for anyone who wants their technology allocation to reflect where the sector's value actually sits.

Approximate weights as of October 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

There are three common ways to get RSPT exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of RSPT directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so RSPT sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. RSPT trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Whether RSPT is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is RSPT a buy?

RSPT gives you the S&P 500 Equal Weight Information Technology Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.40% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

Whether RSPT is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is RSPT a buy?

RSPT yields 0.23% as of October 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see RSPT dividend: yield and schedule.

For what analysts expect from the companies RSPT holds, its yield as a guide to income, and why no one publishes a price target for the fund itself, see the RSPT forecast.

New to funds like RSPT? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.