What Is VAW? Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF Shares

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

VAW is Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF Shares, an ETF that tracks an index of US materials-sector companies at a 0.09% expense ratio. VAW is filed under Natural Resources but holds the GICS materials sector, and the difference shows immediately. Linde, an industrial gas company selling oxygen and nitrogen under long-term contracts, is 15.7% of the fund. Sherwin-Williams, Ecolab and Air Products follow. Only Newmont at 6.6% and Freeport-McMoRan at 5.9% are pure miners in the top ten. Concentration is high: ten holdings account for 56.1% of the portfolio. Vanguard charges 0.09%, the fund holds $4.5 billion, yields 1.39% and dates to 2004.

Ticker
VAW
Issuer
Vanguard
Tracks
an index of US materials-sector companies
Expense ratio
0.09%
AUM
$4.5B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
1.39%
Inception
2004

VAW is issued by Vanguard and tracks an index of US materials-sector companies. It charges a 0.09% expense ratio, holds approximately $4.5B in assets under management, yields about 1.39%, and launched in 2004.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Chemicals, not commodities

People buying a materials fund often want exposure to raw commodity prices. VAW delivers something else. Linde at 15.7% produces industrial gases and sells them to steelmakers, hospitals and electronics manufacturers, frequently under contracts running many years, which makes its revenues far steadier than a mining company's. Sherwin-Williams at 5.3% sells paint. Ecolab at 4.6% sells cleaning and water treatment services. Air Products at 3.9% is another industrial gas producer.

These businesses consume commodities as inputs rather than selling them as outputs. When copper or oil prices rise, a miner's revenue rises and a paint manufacturer's costs rise. The two respond to the same input in opposite directions, and a fund holding both does not translate cleanly into a commodity position.

The genuine commodity exposure is Newmont at 6.6%, a gold producer, and Freeport-McMoRan at 5.9%, primarily a copper miner. Together 12.5%. That is real and meaningful, and it is a minority of the fund. Anyone using VAW as a metals hedge is getting a portion of what they intend and a majority of something else.

What the materials sector actually contains

The materials classification is an accounting convention, not an investment theme. It gathers chemicals, construction materials, containers and packaging, metals and mining, and paper and forest products under one heading because those industries all transform physical inputs. The businesses inside have very little in common economically.

CRH at 4.7% and Vulcan Materials at 2.5% illustrate the point. Both are aggregates and building materials companies whose demand comes from road construction, infrastructure spending and housing starts. Their fortunes follow government budgets and construction cycles, which have no particular relationship to the copper price or the gold price. Corteva at 3.7% is agricultural, following crop prices and planted acreage. Nucor at 3.2% makes steel.

So a single sector fund is holding at least four distinct economic exposures: industrial gases and specialty chemicals, construction aggregates, metals mining and agricultural inputs. Sector weights of 89% materials, 9% consumer discretionary and small residuals hide that entirely. The label is one thing; the underlying drivers are four.

Concentration and cost

Ten holdings at 56.1% is high for any fund, and higher still when one of them is 15.7% on its own. The materials sector in the United States is not large, and a market-value-weighted fund covering it will inevitably concentrate. The practical implication is that VAW's behaviour is substantially determined by Linde, and that a holder should regard the position as a large single-stock exposure with a diversified tail attached.

At 0.09% the fee is low for a sector fund, which is Vanguard's usual approach and a real advantage over sector products charging several times that. The 1.39% yield reflects a mix of steadier industrial businesses paying regular dividends and miners whose payouts move with commodity prices.

The useful contrast within the same category label is GUNR, which filters for upstream resource ownership and arrives at 52% materials, 29% energy and a global holdings list led by an agricultural company. Two funds, one category, entirely different exposures. Choosing between them requires knowing which economic driver you actually want, because the category name does not tell you.

VAW holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of VAW
1LINLinde PLC15.7%
2NEMNewmont Corp6.6%
3FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc5.9%
4SHWSherwin-Williams Co5.3%
5CRHCRH PLC4.7%
6ECLEcolab Inc4.6%
7APDAir Products and Chemicals Inc3.9%
8CTVACorteva Inc3.7%
9NUENucor Corp3.2%
10VMCVulcan Materials Co2.5%

How do I invest in VAW?

There are three common ways to get VAW exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of VAW directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so VAW sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. VAW trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is VAW a good buy?

Whether VAW is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks an index of US materials-sector companies, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is VAW a buy?

The bottom line on VAW

VAW gives you an index of US materials-sector companies exposure in one ticker at a 0.09% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on VAW

Whether VAW is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is VAW a buy?

VAW yields 1.39% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see VAW dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like VAW? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how VAW fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in VAW with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how VAW fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Is VAW a commodities fund?

+

No. It holds equities in the materials sector, and most of the largest positions are companies that consume commodities rather than produce them. Linde at 15.7% sells industrial gases, Sherwin-Williams sells paint and Ecolab sells cleaning services. Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan are genuine miners at 6.6% and 5.9%, but between them they are a minority of the fund.

Why is Linde such a large position?

+

The fund weights by market value, and Linde is by some distance the largest company in the US materials sector. At 15.7% it is more than double the next holding. That produces real single-stock concentration: a difficult period for Linde would move the whole fund noticeably, in a way that would not happen in a broader portfolio.

What is the materials sector?

+

A classification grouping companies that transform physical inputs, covering chemicals, construction materials, containers and packaging, metals and mining, and paper and forest products. The businesses inside share a classification rather than an economic driver. An industrial gas producer, an aggregates supplier and a gold miner respond to entirely different conditions despite sitting in the same sector.

Does VAW hold gold miners?

+

Newmont is 6.6% of the fund, the second largest position, and is primarily a gold producer. That is meaningful exposure but it is one holding among many. A dedicated gold miners fund would give far more concentrated exposure to gold prices. In VAW, Newmont sits alongside chemical companies whose economics have no relationship to the gold price.

What does VAW cost?

+

0.09% a year, or $9 per $10,000 held. That is low for a sector fund, where fees of 0.4% and above are common. Vanguard's pricing is a genuine advantage here, particularly for a holding that many investors size as a modest satellite position where a high fee would consume a large share of the benefit.

How concentrated is VAW?

+

Considerably. The ten largest positions account for 56.1% of the fund, with Linde alone at 15.7%, Newmont at 6.6% and Freeport-McMoRan at 5.9%. That is a consequence of the US materials sector being relatively small, so a market-value-weighted fund covering it cannot spread exposure widely. It is closer to a concentrated portfolio than a diversified one.

How does VAW differ from GUNR?

+

Both carry a Natural Resources label and hold very different things. VAW is the US materials sector at 89% materials, led by industrial gas and chemical companies. GUNR filters globally for upstream resource ownership, arriving at 52% materials, 29% energy and 12% consumer staples, with agricultural companies at the top. VAW charges 0.09%, GUNR 0.46%.

What are the risks of holding VAW?

+

Single-stock risk from Linde at 15.7% and top-ten concentration at 56.1%. Sector risk, since the whole fund sits in one classification and will fall together when industrial activity slows. Cyclical exposure through the construction materials and mining holdings, which follow economic and commodity cycles. And no diversification benefit against a broad US equity fund, which already holds these companies.

What is VAW's expense ratio?

+

VAW has an expense ratio of 0.09% per year as of August 2026, charged by Vanguard and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $9 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track an index of US materials-sector companies before you choose.

How do I compare VAW to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. VAW's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Vanguard's fund page or your broker before investing.