What Is VPL? Vanguard FTSE Pacific Index Fund ETF Shares

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

VPL is Vanguard FTSE Pacific Index Fund ETF Shares, an ETF that tracks a FTSE index of large, mid and small-cap companies in developed Pacific markets, spanning Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand at a 0.07% expense ratio. VPL covers developed markets around the Pacific rim, with Japan supplying the largest number of holdings and Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand filling out the rest. Mainland China is not included. The fund charges 0.07%, holds $13.8B, yields 2.61% and dates to 2005. What separates it from other regional funds is not the geography but the concentration inside it: Samsung Electronics at 7.9% and SK Hynix at 7.5% together account for 15.4% of the portfolio, and technology is 32% of the whole fund.

Ticker
VPL
Issuer
Vanguard
Tracks
a FTSE index of large, mid and small-cap companies in developed Pacific markets, spanning Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand
Expense ratio
0.07%
AUM
$13.8B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
2.61%
Inception
2005

VPL is issued by Vanguard and tracks a FTSE index of large, mid and small-cap companies in developed Pacific markets, spanning Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand. It charges a 0.07% expense ratio, holds approximately $13.8B in assets under management, yields about 2.61%, and launched in 2005.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

A regional fund with a memory-chip core

The country label suggests diversification across several mature economies. The holdings tell a narrower story. Samsung Electronics at 7.9% and SK Hynix at 7.5% are the two largest positions, and both manufacture memory semiconductors. Kioxia Holdings at 1.5% is a third memory business. Tokyo Electron at 1.6% and Advantest at 1.1% supply equipment to the same industry.

Add those together and roughly a fifth of the fund is tied to the memory and semiconductor equipment cycle, an industry with pronounced boom and bust pricing dynamics that has little to do with Japanese consumer demand or Australian resource output. Technology at 32% of the fund is the single largest sector by some distance.

This is not a flaw in the fund. It is what a cap-weighted index does when a small number of companies in a region become very large. But it means a buyer should understand what they are actually taking on. Anyone holding VPL alongside a US technology position may own the same semiconductor cycle twice.

What the rest of the portfolio contains

Below the chip complex the fund holds the region's large financial and industrial incumbents. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group at 1.7%, Commonwealth Bank of Australia at 1.5% and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group at 1.1% put financials at 18% of the fund. BHP Group at 1.6% anchors materials at 7%. Toyota at 1.4% is the largest consumer name.

Industrials at 17% is a higher weight than most regional equity funds carry and reflects Japan's deep base of machinery, trading and capital goods companies. Consumer discretionary at 9% completes the top five sectors.

Because the index reaches down into mid and small-cap territory rather than stopping at large caps, the tail of the portfolio is long and individual small positions carry negligible weight. The character of the fund is set almost entirely by its largest twenty holdings.

Cost, currency and the China question

At 0.07% the fee is among the lowest available for regional international exposure, which is the usual Vanguard position. There is no currency hedge, so returns to a US-dollar investor combine local share moves with the yen, the Australian dollar, the won, the Hong Kong dollar and the Singapore dollar. In the case of Japan in particular, currency swings have historically been large enough to change the sign of a year's return, and the fund makes no attempt to manage that.

The most common misunderstanding about VPL is the absence of China. FTSE classifies mainland China as an emerging market, so it sits outside this fund entirely. Investors who buy a Pacific fund expecting Asia-wide coverage are missing the region's largest economy. Hong Kong-listed companies are included, which is not the same thing.

The fund suits someone building a regional international allocation piece by piece, or wanting developed Asia-Pacific exposure without emerging-market risk. It is the wrong tool for broad international coverage, where a global developed fund does more with one holding, and the wrong tool for anyone who wants Asia exposure that includes China.

VPL holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of VPL
1Samsung Electronics Co Ltd7.9%
2SK Hynix Inc7.5%
3Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc1.7%
4Tokyo Electron Ltd1.6%
5BHP Group Ltd1.6%
6Kioxia Holdings Corp Ordinary Shares1.5%
7Commonwealth Bank of Australia1.5%
8Toyota Motor Corp1.4%
9Advantest Corp1.1%
10Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc1.1%

How do I invest in VPL?

There are three common ways to get VPL exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of VPL directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so VPL sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. VPL trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is VPL a good buy?

Whether VPL is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks a FTSE index of large, mid and small-cap companies in developed Pacific markets, spanning Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is VPL a buy?

The bottom line on VPL

VPL gives you a FTSE index of large, mid and small-cap companies in developed Pacific markets, spanning Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand exposure in one ticker at a 0.07% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on VPL

Whether VPL is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is VPL a buy?

VPL yields 2.61% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see VPL dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like VPL? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how VPL fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in VPL with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how VPL fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Does VPL include China?

+

No. FTSE classifies mainland China as an emerging market, and VPL covers developed markets only. Hong Kong-listed companies are in scope, but that is a much smaller and different set of businesses than the mainland market. If you want China exposure you need an emerging-market fund or a dedicated China fund; buying VPL will not give it to you.

How much of VPL is Japan?

+

Japan supplies the largest share of holdings, and most of the fund's mid-sized positions are Japanese: Mitsubishi UFJ, Tokyo Electron, Kioxia, Toyota, Advantest and Sumitomo Mitsui all appear in the top ten. Country weights shift with market values, so the current published breakdown is the figure to check. What is stable is that Japan dominates by number of companies while Korea dominates the very top of the book.

Why are two Korean companies the largest holdings?

+

Because the index weights by market capitalisation, and Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix have grown to a size that outstrips every Japanese or Australian company in the index. Together they are 15.4% of the fund. Both are memory-semiconductor manufacturers, so the fund's two biggest bets are on the same industry cycle rather than on two independent businesses.

Is VPL a substitute for a broad international fund?

+

No. It covers one region and excludes Europe, Canada and all emerging markets. Used alone it leaves large gaps. Its usual role is as a component in a portfolio where an investor is choosing regional weights deliberately rather than accepting the global market's weighting. A single total international fund is simpler if you have no regional view.

Does VPL hedge currency risk?

+

No. The fund holds shares denominated in yen, Australian dollars, Korean won, Hong Kong dollars and Singapore dollars and reports in US dollars. Currency movements are passed through in full. Given how large yen moves can be over a year, this is a significant part of what determines outcomes for a dollar-based investor, and hedged alternatives exist if that exposure is unwanted.

What is the difference between VPL and a Japan-only fund?

+

A Japan fund gives you one country and one currency. VPL adds Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand, which brings in Australian banks and miners and Korean semiconductors. The Korean addition is not a minor diversification: it is the source of the fund's two largest positions and much of its technology weight.

Why is the 2.61% yield higher than a US index fund's?

+

Australian and Japanese companies, and Asian financials in particular, distribute a larger share of earnings than the US mega-caps that dominate American indexes. Commonwealth Bank, Mitsubishi UFJ, Sumitomo Mitsui and BHP are all substantial payers. Distribution timing in these markets is often semi-annual or annual, so payments arrive unevenly through the year rather than in a smooth quarterly pattern.

Does VPL hold small-cap companies?

+

Yes. The index reaches across large, mid and small capitalisations, so the holdings list runs long. In practice this changes the character of the fund very little, because market-cap weighting means the small positions carry tiny weights. The fund's behaviour is driven almost entirely by its twenty largest holdings, several of which are in the same industry.

What is VPL's expense ratio?

+

VPL has an expense ratio of 0.07% per year as of August 2026, charged by Vanguard and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $7 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track a FTSE index of large, mid and small-cap companies in developed Pacific markets, spanning Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand before you choose.

How do I compare VPL to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. VPL's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Vanguard's fund page or your broker before investing.