What Is XLG? Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

XLG is Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF, an ETF that tracks the S&P 500 Top 50 Index at a 0.20% expense ratio. XLG holds the fifty largest companies in the S&P 500, weighted by market capitalisation, which makes it the index without its tail. The effect is severe: the ten largest positions account for roughly 58% of assets and technology alone is 49% of the fund. Nvidia is 11.9% and Apple 10.5%, so two companies represent close to a quarter of the portfolio. The fund charges 0.20%, holds $10.3B, yields 0.65%, and has been running since 2005, well before megacap concentration became a common topic.

Ticker
XLG
Issuer
Invesco
Tracks
the S&P 500 Top 50 Index
Expense ratio
0.20%
AUM
$10.3B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.65%
Inception
2005

XLG is issued by Invesco and tracks the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It charges a 0.20% expense ratio, holds approximately $10.3B in assets under management, yields about 0.65%, and launched in 2005.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Two Alphabet lines are one company

Alphabet appears twice in the holdings, as Class A shares at 5.2% and Class C shares at 4.1%. These are two listings of the same business, not two positions. Combined, Alphabet is 9.3% of the fund, which places it third behind Nvidia at 11.9% and Apple at 10.5% and above Microsoft at 6.8%. Any holdings table that lists the two lines separately understates how much of the fund rests on one company.

Do the same arithmetic on the whole top ten and the picture sharpens further. Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, both Alphabet lines, Broadcom, Micron, Meta and Tesla add to roughly 58% of assets. Nvidia and Apple alone are 22.4%. Nothing here is hidden, but the scale of it tends to surprise people who think of XLG as a large cap index fund with a tweak.

What removing 450 companies does

The S&P 500 is already top-heavy, so an investor might expect that keeping only the largest fifty changes little. It changes more than that. Removing the smaller 450 members strips out most of the industrial, healthcare, consumer staples, utility and real estate exposure that gives the parent index its balance. What remains is technology at 49%, communication services at 13%, consumer discretionary and financials at 10% each and healthcare at 7%.

That is not a broad market fund by any reasonable reading. Half the money sits in one sector, and within that sector it is concentrated in a handful of semiconductor and platform businesses. Micron at 3.2% is a notable inclusion, since memory pricing is one of the most cyclical inputs in the technology industry and it now carries a meaningful weight in what is presented as a large cap core product.

The fund does exactly what its rules say, and there is nothing wrong with the construction. The issue is the label. Anyone using XLG in place of an S&P 500 fund is making a concentrated bet on the largest companies staying largest, which is a legitimate position but a very different one from owning the index.

Fee, income and mechanics

At 0.20%, XLG costs several times more than the cheapest S&P 500 trackers. The extra is not buying research or active management, since the rule is mechanical: take the fifty largest by market capitalisation and weight them by size. It is buying the rule itself, and whether that is worth the difference depends entirely on whether you want the concentration.

The 0.65% yield is low, and follows directly from the composition. Companies dominated by technology and platform businesses distribute a smaller share of earnings than the broader index, and several of the largest holdings pay nothing. XLG is not usable as an income holding.

One practical point about rebalancing: the fund resets to the fifty largest companies on a schedule, so it sells companies that have shrunk out of the top fifty and buys those that have grown into it. That is momentum embedded in the construction. It is not a criticism, but it means the fund systematically increases exposure to whatever has recently appreciated, which is the opposite of what a rebalancing rule normally does.

XLG holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of XLG
1NVDANVIDIA Corp11.9%
2AAPLApple Inc10.5%
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.8%
4AMZNAmazon.com Inc5.7%
5GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A5.2%
6AVGOBroadcom Inc4.4%
7GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C4.1%
8MUMicron Technology Inc3.2%
9METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A3.0%
10TSLATesla Inc2.9%

How do I invest in XLG?

There are three common ways to get XLG exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of XLG directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so XLG sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. XLG trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is XLG a good buy?

Whether XLG is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is XLG a buy?

The bottom line on XLG

XLG gives you the S&P 500 Top 50 Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.20% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on XLG

Whether XLG is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is XLG a buy?

XLG yields 0.65% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see XLG dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like XLG? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how XLG fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in XLG with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how XLG fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

How many companies does XLG hold?

+

Fifty, drawn from the S&P 500 by market capitalisation. Because Alphabet has two share classes in the index, the holdings list shows more line items than distinct businesses. The count is fixed by the rule rather than variable, so as companies grow into or fall out of the top fifty the membership turns over on the index's scheduled review dates.

Why does Alphabet appear twice?

+

Alphabet has two listed share classes, A and C, both of which are index constituents. They show up as separate entries at 5.2% and 4.1%, but they represent claims on the same company. Combined, Alphabet is 9.3% of the fund, which ranks it third behind Nvidia and Apple. Reading the holdings table without combining them understates the true single-company exposure.

How concentrated is XLG?

+

Severely, by design. The ten largest entries account for roughly 58% of assets. Nvidia is 11.9% and Apple 10.5%, so those two alone are more than a fifth of the fund. Technology is 49% of the portfolio. This is the intended outcome of holding only the fifty largest companies, but it means the fund's results depend on a small number of businesses to an unusual degree.

How is XLG different from an S&P 500 fund?

+

It holds the same kind of companies but drops the smaller 450 members, which removes most of the industrial, healthcare, staples, utility and real estate weight that balances the parent index. Sector exposure shifts sharply toward technology, which reaches 49% here. The two funds share many of their largest positions, so they overlap heavily at the top and diverge completely below it.

Is XLG effectively a technology fund?

+

Close to half of it is. Technology is 49% of assets and communication services adds another 13%, much of which is Alphabet and Meta. It is not a pure sector fund, since financials, healthcare and consumer companies are present, but a sector weight approaching half means technology drives the fund's behaviour more than the diversified label suggests.

What does the 0.65% yield reflect?

+

The dividend policies of the largest US companies, several of which distribute little or nothing and prefer buybacks or reinvestment. The trailing yield of 0.65% is lower than the broad S&P 500 produces, because the smaller members that were removed include many higher-paying utilities, staples and energy companies. XLG is not built for income and should not be assessed on that basis.

Is 0.20% justified for a mechanical rule?

+

That depends on what alternatives you would use. The cheapest broad S&P 500 funds cost a small fraction of it, and the rule XLG applies is simple enough that the fee is not buying analytical work. What it buys is the specific exposure, which no cheap fund replicates exactly. If you want the top fifty as a discrete allocation, this is the cost of getting it in one holding.

What kind of market conditions is XLG most exposed to?

+

Anything that affects the largest US companies as a group, and particularly semiconductors and large platform businesses. With Nvidia at 11.9%, Apple at 10.5% and Alphabet's combined lines at 9.3%, developments affecting those three matter more than the other forty-seven positions put together. The fund is also fully exposed to any period in which market leadership rotates toward smaller companies, since it holds none of them.

What is XLG's expense ratio?

+

XLG has an expense ratio of 0.20% per year as of August 2026, charged by Invesco and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $20 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the S&P 500 Top 50 Index before you choose.

How do I compare XLG to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. XLG's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Invesco's fund page or your broker before investing.