ACT vs ESNT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

ACT (Enact Holdings) and ESNT (Essent Group) share investment themes but are different businesses. The right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme.

ACT vs ESNT: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricACTESNTWhat it tells you
Market cap$6.73B$6.13BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E9.788.67Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E10.339.46Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.460.76Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range98% of range84% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book1.291.09How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Before you buy: how ACT and ESNT affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ACT and ESNT share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ACT and ESNT exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Enact Holdings (ACT) do?

Enact Holdings (Nasdaq: ACT) sells private mortgage insurance. When a borrower puts down less than 20% on a conventional loan sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, the GSEs require credit enhancement, and Enact is one of a handful of companies that provides it. The economics are simple to describe and slow to unwind: Enact writes a policy, collects a recurring premium for as long as the loan stays outstanding, and pays a claim only if the borrower defaults and the foreclosure proceeds fall short. That produces a large, slow-moving book. Primary insurance in force was about $274B as of the second quarter of 2026, up roughly 2% year over year, and new insurance written in the quarter was about $15.2B. Revenue is net premiums earned plus investment income on the reserve portfolio, and because the cost base is thin, the operating margin runs above 70%.

Full ACT guide

What does Essent Group (ESNT) do?

Essent Group Ltd (NYSE: ESNT) is a Bermuda-domiciled holding company whose main subsidiary, Essent Guaranty, writes private mortgage insurance in the United States. Private mortgage insurance covers the lender (and ultimately Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac) against loss when a borrower who put down less than 20% stops paying, which is what lets a first-time buyer close with 3% to 5% down. Essent earns a small annual premium on each insured loan and keeps earning it until the borrower refinances, sells, or builds enough equity to cancel coverage. Insurance in force was about $247.9 billion at the end of March 2026, with a weighted average FICO of 747 and persistency of 84.7%, meaning the vast majority of the book renews each year. Two smaller arms sit alongside it: Essent Re, a Bermuda reinsurer that takes GSE credit risk transfer and, more recently, third-party property and casualty business including a Lloyd's program, and Essent Title Insurance (the former Agents National Title, bought from CoreLogic in 2023) with the Boston National Title agency.

Full ESNT guide

ACT vs ESNT: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • ACT drivers: Insurance in force compounding on high persistency; Credit performance and reserve development.
  • ESNT drivers: Insurance in force and persistency; Credit performance and reserve development.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Enact is a concentrated bet on US mortgage credit, with essentially one product, one country and one collateral type. For ESNT, essent's core exposure is the housing and employment cycle, and the current low loss ratio assumes home equity keeps converting would-be claims into sales.

ACT or ESNT: which should you pick?

Pick ACT if you believe its drivers more; ESNT if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ACT and ESNT guides.

ACT vs ESNT: the full fundamentals

ACT. The multiple is typical of the mortgage insurance group rather than a company-specific discount: the market generally capitalizes these earnings at a low double-digit P/E and around book value because reported profits include reserve releases that are not assumed to repeat through a credit cycle. Price to book near 1.25x with mid-teens ROE implies the market expects returns to normalize lower over time. Because roughly 81% of the shares sit with Genworth, the free float is thin, which affects liquidity and the practical relevance of index-driven flows.

ESNT. Essent carried a market capitalization near $6.1 billion on roughly 92 million shares in early August 2026, putting the stock at about 9 to 10 times trailing earnings and a modest premium to its $61.20 book value per share. Q1 2026 net income was $171.8 million, or $1.82 per diluted share, on revenue of $336.1 million, with an annualized return on average equity of 12.0%. Second-quarter results were scheduled for August 7, 2026, so figures here reflect the March quarter. Valuation numbers are approximate and move with the share price.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): ACT shows market cap ~$6.7B, revenue (ttm) ~$1.25B, net income (ttm) ~$683M, p/e (trailing / forward) ~10.3x / ~9.9x; ESNT shows net premiums earned (q1 2026) ~$260M, net income (ttm) ~$686M, diluted eps (ttm) ~$7.03, book value per share ~$61 (Mar 31, 2026).

The bottom line: ACT vs ESNT

ACT and ESNT are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ACT and ESNT exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how ACT or ESNT fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Enact Holdings with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ACT fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between ACT and ESNT?

+

Enact Holdings (Nasdaq: ACT) sells private mortgage insurance. Essent Group Ltd (NYSE: ESNT) is a Bermuda-domiciled holding company whose main subsidiary, Essent Guaranty, writes private mortgage insurance in the United States. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is ACT or ESNT the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, ACT or ESNT?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), ACT trades at 9.78x and ESNT at 8.67x, so ESNT is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both ACT and ESNT?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of ACT vs ESNT?

+

ACT: Enact is a concentrated bet on US mortgage credit, with essentially one product, one country and one collateral type. A housing downturn combined with rising unemployment would raise delinquencies, turn favorable reserve development into reserve strengthening, and hit earnings faster than premiums could reprice. Policy risk is real and recurring: FHFA capital rules (PMIERs), GSE pricing through loan-level adjustments, and FHA premium changes can each shift the economics of private mortgage insurance without any change in Enact's own execution, since FHA is a direct substitute for the same borrower. Competition among the six private mortgage insurers runs through proprietary risk-based pricing engines that are not publicly disclosed, so price competition is difficult for outside investors to observe until it shows up in returns. Genworth's roughly 81% ownership means the public float is limited, minority holders have little influence, and Enact's capital return policy is shaped by a parent with its own funding needs including its CareScout long-term care initiatives. As of August 2026 no securities-fraud class action against Enact was identified in public filings or court dockets. ESNT: Essent's core exposure is the housing and employment cycle, and the current low loss ratio assumes home equity keeps converting would-be claims into sales. A sustained rise in unemployment or a decline in home prices would raise both default frequency and claim severity, and the reserve releases that have flattered recent quarters would reverse into strengthening. New insurance written of $11.1 billion in Q1 2026 depends on a purchase-origination market that affordability continues to constrain, and Essent competes for that volume with five other approved insurers plus FHA, which limits pricing power. Concentration is real: the vast majority of earnings still come from one U.S. product sold through a small number of large lenders, and changes to PMIERs capital rules, GSE policy, or the structure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after conservatorship could reset the economics of the whole industry. The reinsurance expansion introduces underwriting risk in lines where Essent has a shorter track record.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ACT or ESNT; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    ACT vs ESNT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App