ADI vs MPWR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
ADI and MPWR are similarly sized, but ADI trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (24.39x vs 40.98x): the market is paying up for MPWR's profile and pricing ADI more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
ADI vs MPWR: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | ADI | MPWR | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E | 24.39 | 40.98 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 54.67 | 86.95 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.19 | 1.71 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 66% of range | 69% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 5.30 | 19.05 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: ADI is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how ADI and MPWR affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ADI and MPWR share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ADI and MPWR exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Analog Devices (ADI) do?
Analog Devices designs, manufactures, and markets integrated circuits, software, and subsystem products that convert real-world analog signals into digital data and back again. Its core product families include data converters, amplifiers, power management ICs, radio frequency and microwave chips, and MEMS-based sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes. ADI sells into four end markets: Industrial (the largest, roughly half of revenue), Automotive, Communications, and Consumer. Revenue is generated primarily through direct sales to original equipment manufacturers and through a global distribution network spanning North and South America, Europe, Japan, China, and the rest of Asia. The company's hybrid manufacturing model combines owned fabs with foundry partnerships, giving it flexibility in capacity and cost management.
What does Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) do?
Monolithic Power Systems is a Kirkland, Washington based fabless semiconductor company that designs power-management and analog integrated circuits. Its proprietary BCD (bipolar-CMOS-DMOS) process integrates analog, digital, and memory functions onto a single chip, which lets it build compact, high-efficiency power modules used across enterprise data and AI servers, automotive, computing and storage, communications, industrial, and consumer end markets. The company outsources manufacturing and focuses on design, and its integrated power modules have become a reference standard as AI GPU clusters push toward extreme power densities.
ADI vs MPWR: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- ADI drivers: Industrial Automation and the Intelligent Edge; AI Infrastructure and Automated Test Equipment.
- MPWR drivers: AI data-center power demand; Diversified end markets.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Analog semiconductors are cyclical, and a slowdown in industrial capital spending or a prolonged pause in automotive orders can deflate revenue quickly, as seen during the fiscal 2024 trough. For MPWR, the most visible risk is valuation: a market cap near $70 billion on roughly $2.9 billion of trailing revenue leaves little margin for error, so any growth disappointment can trigger sharp drawdowns.
ADI or MPWR: which should you pick?
ADI vs MPWR: the full fundamentals
ADI. ADI's trailing P/E of roughly 60 to 70x is above its own 10-year historical average of approximately 38x, reflecting the market's pricing of a sustained earnings recovery and secular growth from industrial automation and AI infrastructure. The forward P/E of approximately 32x is more moderate and assumes continued double-digit earnings growth into fiscal 2026. Free cash flow conversion at 39% of revenue is well above the semiconductor sector average, providing a tangible foundation for the valuation premium, though it does not eliminate the risk of multiple compression if growth expectations are not met.
MPWR. MPWR trades at a steep premium to the broader semiconductor group, reflecting its growth rate and AI exposure rather than current earnings. Gross margin has held near 55 percent, and the balance sheet is largely debt-free. The gap between the trailing multiple near 100x and the forward multiple near 50x underscores how much future earnings growth is embedded in the price.
Headline figures (approximate, June 27, 2026 (based on fiscal year 2025 results reported November 25, 2025, and fiscal Q1 2026 results reported February 18, 2026)): ADI shows revenue (fiscal year 2025) ~$11.0 billion, revenue (fiscal q1 2026) ~$3.16 billion, free cash flow (fiscal year 2025) ~$4.3 billion (~39% of revenue), gross margin (ttm) ~62% to 63%; MPWR shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.9B, fy2025 revenue ~$2.79B (+26% YoY), q1 2026 revenue ~$804M (+26% YoY, record), market cap ~$70B.
The bottom line: ADI vs MPWR
ADI and MPWR are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ADI and MPWR exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how ADI or MPWR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Analog Devices with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ADI fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between ADI and MPWR?
+
Analog Devices designs, manufactures, and markets integrated circuits, software, and subsystem products that convert real-world analog signals into digital data and back again. Monolithic Power Systems is a Kirkland, Washington based fabless semiconductor company that designs power-management and analog integrated circuits. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is ADI or MPWR the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, ADI or MPWR?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), ADI trades at 24.39x and MPWR at 40.98x, so ADI is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both ADI and MPWR?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of ADI vs MPWR?
+
ADI: Analog semiconductors are cyclical, and a slowdown in industrial capital spending or a prolonged pause in automotive orders can deflate revenue quickly, as seen during the fiscal 2024 trough. ADI's automotive segment is under near-term pressure from tariff-related demand pull-ins unwinding, and China represents a meaningful share of automotive revenue, making geopolitical escalation or localization policies a specific exposure. The trailing P/E ratio is elevated relative to ADI's own 10-year historical average, meaning that any disappointment in revenue growth or margin guidance could lead to a multiple compression that punishes shareholders even if the underlying business remains healthy. Additionally, Chinese domestic analog vendors such as SG Micro and Will Semi are intensifying price competition in mainstream segments within China, a market ADI cannot easily afford to cede. MPWR: The most visible risk is valuation: a market cap near $70 billion on roughly $2.9 billion of trailing revenue leaves little margin for error, so any growth disappointment can trigger sharp drawdowns. Heavy reliance on AI-related enterprise data spending means a slowdown in hyperscaler capital expenditure would hit results directly. Customer concentration among a few large chip and system makers adds vulnerability if a design socket is lost. Semiconductor demand is cyclical, and automotive or industrial softness could offset AI strength. Competition from much larger analog rivals and pricing pressure remain persistent structural threats.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ADI or MPWR; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.