AMGN vs LLY: How Amgen and Eli Lilly Compare (2026)
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
AMGN and LLY are similarly sized, but AMGN trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (16.43x vs 25.50x): the market is paying up for LLY's profile and pricing AMGN more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
AMGN vs LLY: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | AMGN | LLY | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E | 16.43 | 25.50 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 26.80 | 40.81 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.40 | 0.51 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 90% of range | 84% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 22.62 | 32.90 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: AMGN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how AMGN and LLY affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AMGN and LLY share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AMGN and LLY exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Amgen (AMGN) do?
Amgen (AMGN) is one of the world's largest biotechnology companies, developing, manufacturing, and selling human therapeutics primarily for serious illnesses. Its portfolio spans inflammation, oncology, cardiovascular disease, bone health, and rare diseases, with well-known products that have included Enbrel, Prolia and Xgeva, Repatha, Otezla, and a growing pipeline. Amgen pioneered large-scale recombinant-protein and antibody manufacturing and is a leader in biosimilars as older biologics lose patent protection. The 2023 acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics added rare-disease drugs such as Tepezza and Krystexxa. Amgen is also developing obesity and metabolic candidates, including investigational drugs in the GLP-1 class of weight-loss therapies. Headquartered in Thousand Oaks, California, and founded in 1980, Amgen is a member of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and returns substantial cash to shareholders through a growing dividend and buybacks.
What does Eli Lilly (LLY) do?
Eli Lilly (LLY) is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, currently defined by its leadership in the GLP-1 class of medicines for diabetes and obesity. Its tirzepatide molecule is sold as Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and as Zepbound for chronic weight management, and these products have driven explosive revenue growth amid surging demand for metabolic treatments. Beyond GLP-1s, Lilly has a deep and diversified pipeline and franchises across diabetes, oncology, immunology, and neuroscience, including a closely watched effort in Alzheimer's disease (donanemab, marketed as Kisunla). The company invests heavily in research and in expanding manufacturing capacity to meet incretin demand. Eli Lilly was founded in 1876 and is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana. It has become one of the most valuable healthcare companies in the world, with the obesity and diabetes opportunity central to its growth story, balanced by a premium valuation and the eventual prospect of competition and patent expirations.
AMGN vs LLY: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- AMGN drivers: Rare disease and Horizon assets; Obesity and metabolic pipeline.
- LLY drivers: GLP-1 obesity and diabetes leadership; Manufacturing scale-up.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Amgen faces patent cliffs as older blockbusters lose exclusivity, exposing them to biosimilar competition and pricing pressure. For LLY, lLY trades at a premium valuation, so any disappointment in obesity-drug growth, pricing, or supply can compress the multiple sharply.
AMGN or LLY: which should you pick?
AMGN vs LLY: the full fundamentals
AMGN. Amgen trades at a moderate multiple typical of a mature large-cap biopharma, reflecting steady cash flow and a meaningful dividend balanced against patent-cliff and drug-pricing risk. The valuation embeds expectations for the rare-disease and obesity pipelines to offset declines in older franchises. All figures are approximate and move with the share price and reported results; verify current numbers before relying on them.
LLY. Eli Lilly trades at a premium pharma multiple that prices in continued rapid growth from the obesity and diabetes franchise plus pipeline optionality. The valuation debate centers on how large, durable, and profitable the incretin market proves to be and how competition (chiefly Novo Nordisk and emerging oral incretins) shapes pricing and share. Figures are approximate and should be verified against the latest filings before drawing conclusions.
Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): AMGN shows revenue (ttm) ~$33-35 billion (approximate, verify), operating margin ~30%+ (approximate, verify), p/e (ttm) ~20-25x (GAAP varies; approximate, verify), dividend yield ~3% (approximate, verify); LLY shows revenue (ttm) ~$45 to 55 billion and growing fast (verify), operating margin ~30%+ (verify), gross margin ~80% (typical for branded pharma), p/e (ttm) ~40x to 60x (premium; verify).
The bottom line: AMGN vs LLY
AMGN and LLY are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AMGN and LLY exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how AMGN or LLY fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Amgen with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how AMGN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between AMGN and LLY?
+
Amgen (AMGN) is one of the world's largest biotechnology companies, developing, manufacturing, and selling human therapeutics primarily for serious illnesses. Eli Lilly (LLY) is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, currently defined by its leadership in the GLP-1 class of medicines for diabetes and obesity. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is AMGN or LLY the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, AMGN or LLY?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), AMGN trades at 16.43x and LLY at 25.50x, so AMGN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both AMGN and LLY?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of AMGN vs LLY?
+
AMGN: Amgen faces patent cliffs as older blockbusters lose exclusivity, exposing them to biosimilar competition and pricing pressure. Drug development is high-risk: pipeline candidates, including its obesity programs, can fail in late-stage trials or face regulatory setbacks. US drug-pricing policy, including Medicare negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act, pressures margins on key products. The Horizon acquisition added debt. Litigation, manufacturing, and safety risks are inherent to the industry. Verify the latest pipeline and revenue trends before drawing conclusions. LLY: LLY trades at a premium valuation, so any disappointment in obesity-drug growth, pricing, or supply can compress the multiple sharply. Competition is intense, especially from Novo Nordisk, and a wave of next-generation oral and combination incretins from multiple companies could pressure share and pricing. Eventual patent expirations and the prospect of compounded or generic competition are long-term overhangs. Drug pricing politics, insurance and reimbursement coverage decisions, and manufacturing or safety setbacks are material risks. Pipeline candidates can fail in trials, and the heavy concentration of the growth story in metabolic medicines raises single-category dependence.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell AMGN or LLY; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.