AMZN vs MDB: How Amazon and MongoDB Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: AMZN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AMZN and MDB share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AMZN and MDB exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Amazon is one of the largest companies in the world, operating across three major business lines. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the dominant global cloud computing provider, generating around $110 billion in annual revenue and most of the company's operating income. The North America and International e-commerce segments include the Amazon online marketplace, Prime membership, and third-party seller services. Advertising has grown into the third-largest digital ad business in the world (after Google and Meta).

Full AMZN guide

MongoDB is a database software company built around a document-oriented database that stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents rather than the rigid rows and columns of traditional relational databases. This model maps naturally to how modern developers build applications, making MongoDB popular for fast-moving software teams. The company's primary growth engine is MongoDB Atlas, a fully managed cloud database service that runs across AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud and is billed on consumption. Atlas now generates the majority of revenue and grows faster than the legacy self-managed Enterprise Advanced product. MongoDB has expanded its platform with search, vector search for AI applications, time-series data, and analytics, positioning the database as a foundation for AI-era and operational workloads. The go-to-market strategy is developer-led: teams adopt MongoDB bottom-up, and consumption scales as their applications grow. Founded in 2007 and headquartered in New York, MongoDB is a high-growth, not-yet-consistently-profitable software company tied to cloud and application development trends.

Full MDB guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• AMZN drivers: AWS as the AI infrastructure backbone; Retail margin expansion.
• MDB drivers: Atlas cloud consumption growth; Developer-led adoption and flexibility.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Hyperscaler AI capex is concentrated; if model training demand cools, AWS growth slows. For MDB, mongoDB competes against deeply entrenched relational databases (Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL) and against the cloud providers' own managed databases, including offerings that mimic MongoDB's API.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AMZN if you believe its drivers more; MDB if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AMZN and MDB guides.

AMZN. Amazon's headline P/E reflects the aggregate of low-margin retail and high-margin AWS/advertising. The valuation premium is paid for AWS specifically; retail is essentially valued near cost. P/E of 40x is elevated versus the S&P 500 average (~22x), supported by AWS growth re-accelerating.

MDB. MongoDB trades as a high-growth software stock, with a price-to-sales multiple well above mature software peers, reflecting Atlas consumption growth and AI optionality rather than near-term GAAP profits. The valuation is sensitive to the trajectory of Atlas growth and net expansion. Multiple compression has occurred when consumption growth decelerated or software valuations broadly reset.

Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): AMZN shows revenue (ttm) ~$650 billion, operating margin ~10% (AWS materially higher; retail much lower), net income (ttm) ~$60 billion, eps (ttm) ~$5.50; MDB shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.2 billion, revenue growth ~20% year over year, atlas share of revenue ~70%, growing faster than the overall company, gross margin ~75% (software, cloud-hosting costs included).

AMZN and MDB are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AMZN and MDB exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.