AQN vs NEE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
NEE is the larger of the two ($181.31B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (19.67x forward earnings, beta 0.67). AQN is the smaller challenger ($4.49B), cheaper on forward earnings (14.38x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
AQN vs NEE: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | AQN | NEE | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.49B | $181.31B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 14.38 | 19.67 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 22.46 | 19.53 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.90 | 0.67 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 29% of range | 60% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
Reading it: AQN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how AQN and NEE affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AQN and NEE share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AQN and NEE exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (AQN) do?
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. is a Canadian-domiciled utility whose regulated Liberty Utilities arm provides electricity, natural gas, water, and wastewater service to more than 1.2 million customer connections across the United States, Canada, Bermuda, and Chile. For years Algonquin ran two businesses side by side: regulated utilities and a large non-regulated renewable-energy generation fleet. That model, plus heavy debt and rising interest costs, pushed the company into a painful reset. Management cut the common dividend sharply (a roughly 40% reduction to US$0.065 per quarter), agreed to sell most of its renewable-energy business to New York-based LS Power for up to US$2.5 billion (while keeping certain hydro assets), and refocused around a Back to Basics strategy aimed at becoming a premier pure-play regulated utility.
What does NextEra Energy (NEE) do?
NextEra Energy runs two very different businesses under one holding company. Florida Power & Light is a regulated electric utility serving roughly twelve million people across Florida; it earns an authorized return on the capital it invests in poles, wires, generation, and storage, so its profit grows as it grows its rate base, which expanded about ~8.8% year over year in early 2026. NextEra Energy Resources (NEER) is the competitive arm and the world's largest generator of electricity from wind and solar; it develops, builds, and operates clean-energy and battery-storage projects, selling power and capacity largely under long-term contracts to utilities, corporations, and data-center customers. The regulated utility provides steady, rate-regulated cash flow while the resources segment supplies higher-growth, contracted renewables and storage development.
AQN vs NEE: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- AQN drivers: Transition to a pure-play regulated utility; Rate-base growth and constructive regulation.
- NEE drivers: Record renewables and storage backlog; Data-center and AI power demand.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The main risk is execution: turnarounds often take longer and cost more than planned, and Algonquin has disappointed investors before, so the market may stay skeptical. For NEE, nextEra is highly capital-intensive and carries substantial debt to fund construction, which makes it sensitive to interest rates: higher rates raise its borrowing costs and tend to compress the valuations investors assign to utility and renewable-growth stocks.
AQN or NEE: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AQN if you believe its drivers more; NEE if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AQN and NEE guides.
AQN vs NEE: the full fundamentals
AQN. These are qualitative descriptors tied to the asOf date, not live quotes. Algonquin has been through a major reset, so historical multiples and dividend figures can be misleading. Always verify the current share price, dividend, debt levels, and rate-base guidance from Algonquin's latest filings before acting. As a turnaround-stage regulated utility, the stock's value hinges on execution and rate outcomes more than on any single reported number.
NEE. As of late June 2026, NEE traded near the high-$80s per share with a market cap around ~$184B to ~$186B. The forward P/E of roughly ~23x sits below its own five-year average closer to ~27x but at a premium to several utility peers, a gap the market ties to its ~33 GW backlog and growth profile. Figures are approximate, drawn from the Q1 2026 release and public market data, and move with the share price.
Headline figures (approximate, Jul 2026): AQN shows business model Regulated utility (electric, gas, water, wastewater) via Liberty Utilities; over 1.2 million customer connections across North America, Bermuda, and Chile, revenue trend Q1 2026 total revenue rose year over year (roughly $792M vs ~$692M) on regulated growth, though profit was lower during the transition; confirm current figures, dividend Cut sharply in the reset (about 40%, to US$0.065 per quarter); now positioned as more sustainable rather than a growth-of-income story. Verify the latest declared payout, strategic shift Sold most renewable-energy business to LS Power (up to US$2.5B, excluding debt), kept certain hydro; now a pure-play regulated utility under a Back to Basics plan; NEE shows revenue (ttm) ~$27.9B, adjusted eps guidance (fy2026) ~$3.92 to ~$4.02, dividend yield ~2.7%, adjusted eps growth target ~8%-plus per year through 2032.
The bottom line: AQN vs NEE
AQN and NEE are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AQN and NEE exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how AQN or NEE fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how AQN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between AQN and NEE?
+
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. NextEra Energy runs two very different businesses under one holding company. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is AQN or NEE the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. NEE is the larger incumbent; AQN is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, AQN or NEE?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), AQN trades at 14.38x and NEE at 19.67x, so AQN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both AQN and NEE?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of AQN vs NEE?
+
AQN: The main risk is execution: turnarounds often take longer and cost more than planned, and Algonquin has disappointed investors before, so the market may stay skeptical. Regulatory risk is central because unfavorable rate rulings across its many jurisdictions (US states, Canada, Bermuda, Chile) would slow the rate-base earnings the whole thesis depends on. The balance sheet, though improving, still carries meaningful debt, so higher-for-longer interest rates or slower asset sales could pressure cash flow. Currency adds noise since Algonquin reports and pays in US dollars while carrying Canadian and international exposure. And the reduced dividend, while more sustainable, means income investors are being asked to wait for growth that is not guaranteed. Any further strategic reversal would deepen the credibility problem. NEE: NextEra is highly capital-intensive and carries substantial debt to fund construction, which makes it sensitive to interest rates: higher rates raise its borrowing costs and tend to compress the valuations investors assign to utility and renewable-growth stocks. A meaningful share of NextEra Energy Resources' economics has historically depended on federal clean-energy tax credits and supportive policy, so changes to subsidies, tariffs on imported equipment, or permitting can pressure project returns and the development pipeline. The renewables and storage backlog also exposes the company to supply-chain, interconnection, and execution timing risk, and the dividend-growth and earnings targets assume that build-out continues roughly on plan.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell AQN or NEE; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.