AXON vs PLTR: How Axon Enterprise and Palantir Technologies Compare (2026)
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
PLTR is the larger of the two ($295.01B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (58.75x forward earnings, beta 1.56). AXON is the smaller challenger ($42.54B), cheaper on forward earnings (50.18x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
AXON vs PLTR: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | AXON | PLTR | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $42.54B | $295.01B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 50.18 | 58.75 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 212.81 | 138.27 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.38 | 1.56 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 35% of range | 17% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 12.03 | 34.91 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: AXON is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how AXON and PLTR affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AXON and PLTR share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AXON and PLTR exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Axon Enterprise (AXON) do?
Axon Enterprise (formerly TASER International) is the dominant supplier of body-worn cameras, in-car video, and conducted electrical weapons (TASERs) to law enforcement worldwide. The company also operates Axon Evidence (Evidence.com), the cloud-based digital evidence management platform that integrates video, audio, and case records, and Axon Records (records management system). Each Axon hardware device generates data that gets stored, processed, and analyzed in Axon's cloud platform, creating a recurring SaaS revenue stream.
What does Palantir Technologies (PLTR) do?
Palantir Technologies provides data integration, analytics, and AI software to government and commercial customers. The company organizes around three main platforms. Gotham is the original government-focused platform used for intelligence, defense, and law enforcement analytics. Foundry is the commercial counterpart used for enterprise data integration and analytics. Apollo is the deployment platform that ships the above to customers' environments (cloud or on-premises). The newer Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) layers generative AI workflows on top of Gotham and Foundry data, allowing customers to build AI agents on their own proprietary data.
AXON vs PLTR: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- AXON drivers: AI-powered features; International expansion.
- PLTR drivers: AIP-driven commercial expansion; US government and defense.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Public sector budget cycles affect short-term revenue. For PLTR, the valuation reflects extraordinary expectations for AIP-driven growth and is among the highest in software.
AXON or PLTR: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AXON if you believe its drivers more; PLTR if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AXON and PLTR guides.
AXON vs PLTR: the full fundamentals
AXON. Axon trades at one of the highest valuations in public sector software, reflecting the dominant position in law enforcement video and TASERs, the high-margin SaaS conversion, and the AI feature roadmap. The premium embeds high expectations and is sensitive to budget cycles.
PLTR. Palantir trades at one of the highest valuations in software by virtually any metric. The premium reflects the AIP-driven growth story, the durable government revenue base, and the rule-of-40 financials. The multiple is sensitive to any growth deceleration; downside risk is substantial if AIP momentum slows.
Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): AXON shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.5 billion, operating margin ~25% (non-GAAP), net income (ttm) ~$400 million (GAAP), eps (ttm) ~$5.20; PLTR shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.5 billion, operating margin ~25% (non-GAAP); GAAP is lower, net income (ttm) ~$700 million (GAAP), eps (ttm) ~$0.30.
The bottom line: AXON vs PLTR
AXON and PLTR are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AXON and PLTR exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how AXON or PLTR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Axon Enterprise with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how AXON fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between AXON and PLTR?
+
Axon Enterprise (formerly TASER International) is the dominant supplier of body-worn cameras, in-car video, and conducted electrical weapons (TASERs) to law enforcement worldwide. Palantir Technologies provides data integration, analytics, and AI software to government and commercial customers. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is AXON or PLTR the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. PLTR is the larger incumbent; AXON is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, AXON or PLTR?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), AXON trades at 50.18x and PLTR at 58.75x, so AXON is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both AXON and PLTR?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of AXON vs PLTR?
+
AXON: Public sector budget cycles affect short-term revenue. Regulatory debates around law enforcement technology (facial recognition, predictive policing) constrain some product features. Competition from Motorola Solutions in body-worn cameras has intensified. PLTR: The valuation reflects extraordinary expectations for AIP-driven growth and is among the highest in software. Any AIP customer acquisition deceleration would compress the multiple sharply. Government revenue concentration with the DoD creates contract renewal risk.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell AXON or PLTR; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.