BAP vs IFS: How Credicorp and Intercorp Financial Services Compare (2026)
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
BAP is the larger of the two ($30.74B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (11.35x forward earnings, beta 0.86). IFS is the smaller challenger ($6.55B), cheaper on forward earnings (8.90x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
BAP vs IFS: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | BAP | IFS | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $30.74B | $6.55B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 11.35 | 8.90 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 14.73 | 10.87 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.86 | 0.44 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 86% of range | 90% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.65 | 1.84 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: IFS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how BAP and IFS affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BAP and IFS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BAP and IFS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Credicorp (BAP) do?
Credicorp is a Bermuda-incorporated holding company headquartered in Lima that owns Peru's largest bank and most of the country's financial plumbing. It runs four lines of business: Universal Banking through Banco de Crédito del Perú (BCP) and Banco de Crédito de Bolivia; Microfinance through Mibanco in Peru and Colombia; Insurance and Pensions through Grupo Pacífico and the private pension manager Prima AFP; and Investment Management and Advisory through Credicorp Capital, BCP's wealth management arm and ASB Bank Corp. The group's most interesting asset is not a balance sheet line at all: Yape, BCP's payments wallet, reached roughly 16 million monthly active users and has extended credit to over 4.1 million clients, and now contributes about 8% of group risk-adjusted revenue. In May 2026 Peru's banking regulator (the SBS) cleared BCP to acquire 100% of Helm Bank USA, adding a Miami-based dollar banking footprint for Latin American clients.
What does Intercorp Financial Services (IFS) do?
Intercorp Financial Services is one of Peru's largest financial groups and reports in three segments. Interbank is the banking business and the bulk of earnings, running retail and commercial lending, deposits, cards and payments through a national branch and digital network. Interseguro is the insurance arm, weighted toward annuities and life products, which makes it sensitive to interest rates and to the reserves it holds against long-dated liabilities. Inteligo is the wealth management business, managing assets for high net worth Peruvian clients and earning fee income that is steadier than lending spreads. The parent is part of the wider Intercorp group, a Peruvian conglomerate with interests spanning retail, education and real estate, and the shares list on both the NYSE and the Lima exchange.
BAP vs IFS: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- BAP drivers: Yape turning from a payments app into a lender; Retail loan mix shifting margins upward.
- IFS drivers: Peruvian credit cycle normalisation; Interseguro and the annuity book.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Peruvian political risk is the dominant variable and it is not hypothetical: two presidents were removed between October 2025 and February 2026, and the April 2026 general election produced a fragmented result with a contested count and calls for annulment. For IFS, country concentration is the dominant risk: essentially all of the group's earnings are Peruvian, and Peru has produced repeated political instability, presidential turnover and periodic pension withdrawal legislation that alters savings behaviour overnight.
BAP or IFS: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick BAP if you believe its drivers more; IFS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the BAP and IFS guides.
BAP vs IFS: the full fundamentals
BAP. Trailing EPS of ~$25.98 grew roughly 25% year over year, so the ~14.9x multiple is being paid on already-elevated earnings rather than on a depressed base. Q1 2026 net income of ~S/2.06 billion at ~21.1% ROE is the record quarter that multiple discounts, and the next print (2Q26) was scheduled for August 13, 2026. The ~3.8% yield is the part of the return that does not depend on the multiple holding.
IFS. IFS reports in Peruvian soles while the NYSE line trades in US dollars, so every ratio above depends on which currency the denominator is in. First quarter 2026 profit of roughly S/ 602 million was a record and up about 35% year over year, with management guiding to full year return on equity above 17%. The double digit earnings multiple sits below US regional bank averages, which is the standard emerging market discount rather than a comment on the quality of this quarter's results.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): BAP shows share price ~$387, market cap ~$30.7B, revenue (ttm) ~$6.3B, net income (ttm) ~$2.07B; IFS shows total assets ~S/ 102 billion (~$29 billion), net income (trailing twelve months) ~$598 million (~S/ 2.1 billion), return on equity ~19% annualised in Q1 2026, market capitalisation ~$6.6 billion.
The bottom line: BAP vs IFS
BAP and IFS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BAP and IFS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how BAP or IFS fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Credicorp with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BAP fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between BAP and IFS?
+
Credicorp is a Bermuda-incorporated holding company headquartered in Lima that owns Peru's largest bank and most of the country's financial plumbing. Intercorp Financial Services is one of Peru's largest financial groups and reports in three segments. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is BAP or IFS the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. BAP is the larger incumbent; IFS is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, BAP or IFS?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), BAP trades at 11.35x and IFS at 8.90x, so IFS is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both BAP and IFS?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of BAP vs IFS?
+
BAP: Peruvian political risk is the dominant variable and it is not hypothetical: two presidents were removed between October 2025 and February 2026, and the April 2026 general election produced a fragmented result with a contested count and calls for annulment. Congress has now authorised eight pension withdrawals since 2019, shrinking private pension assets from roughly $52 billion to around $22 billion, which directly erodes the Prima AFP business and signals that financial-sector rules can be rewritten quickly. Because Credicorp reports in Peruvian soles, a US holder's returns can be cut by currency depreciation even when the bank performs well. The concentration in one small economy also means a commodity downturn (copper prices), a weather shock or renewed social unrest around illegal mining feeds straight into loan losses, and OECD and IMF work through 2026 flags exactly those channels alongside GDP growth of only about 3%. Finally, the shares have already moved from a ~$230 low toward a ~$413 high, so a re-rating that assumed political calm has limited room left if that assumption breaks. IFS: Country concentration is the dominant risk: essentially all of the group's earnings are Peruvian, and Peru has produced repeated political instability, presidential turnover and periodic pension withdrawal legislation that alters savings behaviour overnight. Currency is the second layer, since a weaker sol reduces dollar reported earnings and the dollar share price even if the underlying business is unchanged. Credit is cyclical and the 2023 to 2024 episode showed how quickly Peruvian consumer provisions can spike, so the current low cost of risk should not be read as a permanent level. Copper prices and Chinese demand drive a large share of Peruvian GDP, which means a commodity downturn transmits into loan losses with a lag. Finally, the free float is limited and average daily volume is modest for a company of this size, so position sizing and exit liquidity are practical constraints for smaller investors.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell BAP or IFS; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.