BFLY vs GE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BFLY and GE share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BFLY and GE exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Butterfly Network designs and sells handheld ultrasound systems built on its proprietary Ultrasound-on-Chip technology, which replaces the traditional piezoelectric crystals in an ultrasound machine with a semiconductor sensor. That lets a single probe (the flagship iQ3) image the whole body and connect to a phone or tablet, and the company layers on subscription software, cloud storage, and AI tools that push clinicians toward higher-margin recurring revenue. Customers include hospitals, clinics, medical schools, and increasingly international and lower-resource settings where a $2,000-to-$5,000-range device is far cheaper than a cart-based system.

Full BFLY guide

GE Aerospace is the aviation business of the former General Electric conglomerate, which split into three independent companies, with GE Aerospace retaining the GE ticker. It is one of the world's largest makers of commercial and military jet engines. GE Aerospace designs, manufactures, and services engines that power a large share of the global airliner fleet, including through CFM International, its long-running joint venture with France's Safran that produces the best-selling engines for narrowbody aircraft like the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 families. The company makes money from selling new engines and, more importantly, from a highly profitable aftermarket of spare parts, maintenance, repair, and long-term service agreements that generate recurring revenue over each engine's decades-long life. GE Aerospace also supplies military engines and avionics. Headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, it benefits from a massive installed base of engines, strong air-travel demand, and the lucrative razor-and-blades economics of jet engine servicing.

Full GE guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• BFLY drivers: Software and recurring-revenue mix shift; iQ3 probe and hardware refresh cycle.
• GE drivers: Aftermarket services engine; Dominant narrowbody position.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Butterfly remains unprofitable, with trailing losses of roughly $76M against about $103M of revenue as of Q1 2026, so it depends on its cash balance and, potentially, future capital raises that could dilute shareholders. For GE, gE Aerospace is exposed to the cyclical aviation industry, where downturns, pandemics, or shocks to air travel can sharply reduce flight hours and aftermarket revenue.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick BFLY if you believe its drivers more; GE if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the BFLY and GE guides.

BFLY. As of mid-2026, Butterfly generated roughly $103M in trailing revenue while posting net losses, and it guided to full-year 2026 revenue of about $117M to $121M with an adjusted-EBITDA loss of roughly $21M to $25M. With a market cap in the $1.5B-to-$2.3B range after a large share-price run, the stock trades at a high multiple of sales, so the valuation embeds substantial future growth. The roughly $138M cash balance gives it a multi-year runway at current burn rates.

GE. GE Aerospace is valued as a high-quality aviation franchise with durable, recurring aftermarket profits and leadership in narrowbody engines. Investors assign a premium multiple reflecting the predictability of services revenue and strong air-travel demand. The valuation has expanded considerably, leaving it sensitive to the cyclicality of aviation and to engine delivery and supply chain execution.

Headline figures (approximate, JUNE 2026): BFLY shows revenue (ttm) ~$103M, q1 2026 revenue growth ~25% YoY, fy2026 revenue guidance ~$117M to $121M, gross margin (q1 2026) ~69%; GE shows revenue (ttm) ~$35 to 40 billion, operating margin ~high teens to twenties percent, net income (ttm) ~$6 billion or more, aftermarket revenue ~majority of profit.

BFLY and GE are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BFLY and GE exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.