BN vs BX: How Brookfield Corporation and Blackstone Compare (2026)
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
BX is the larger of the two ($159.00B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (17.11x forward earnings, beta 1.58). BN is the smaller challenger ($98.46B), cheaper on forward earnings (7.51x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
BN vs BX: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | BN | BX | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $98.46B | $159.00B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 7.51 | 17.11 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 86.43 | 28.58 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.84 | 1.58 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 53% of range | 29% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.31 | 11.34 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: BN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how BN and BX affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BN and BX share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BN and BX exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Brookfield Corporation (BN) do?
Brookfield Corporation sits at the top of the Brookfield group and reports through three pillars. Asset management runs through its roughly 73% interest in Brookfield Asset Management, whose fee-bearing capital reached ~$614 billion in the first quarter of 2026, up ~12% year over year on ~$67 billion of year-to-date fundraising that included a ~$40 billion investment mandate from UK annuity provider Just Group. Wealth solutions is the annuity and pension-risk-transfer business (Brookfield Wealth Solutions, built from American National, Argo Group and American Equity Life) that gathers policyholder money and invests it alongside Brookfield's own funds. The third pillar is the operating businesses, held partly through the listed affiliates: Brookfield Renewable (BEP/BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIP/BIPC), Brookfield Business Partners (BBU/BBUC) and a wholly owned real estate book that includes Canary Wharf, Brookfield Place and Ala Moana Center. Bruce Flatt has run the company since 2002, and the December 2022 reorganisation is what created the BN-versus-BAM split: BN kept the balance sheet and the carried interest, BAM was carved out as the pure-play, high-payout manager.
What does Blackstone (BX) do?
Blackstone Inc. is the world's largest alternative asset manager, investing on behalf of pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, insurers, endowments, and increasingly individual investors. It runs money across several major strategies: real estate (historically its largest), private equity, credit and insurance, infrastructure, life sciences, growth equity, secondaries, and hedge fund solutions. The business model has two engines. First, it earns recurring management fees on the capital it manages, which produces relatively stable fee-related earnings and grows as assets under management climb. Second, it earns performance fees (carried interest and incentive fees) when its funds generate strong returns, which are lumpier and depend on realizations and market conditions. Because most of its capital is locked up in long-dated funds, Blackstone has durable, contracted fee streams, and it distributes a large share of its distributable earnings to shareholders as a variable quarterly dividend rather than a fixed one.
BN vs BX: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- BN drivers: Fee-bearing capital and carried interest at BAM; The insurance and annuity flywheel.
- BX drivers: Growth of assets under management; Private wealth and retail channel.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The reported financials are hard to underwrite: consolidation pulls in revenue and debt from entities BN does not fully own, so ~$79 billion of trailing revenue and ~$1.2 billion of attributable net income describe the same company, and an investor has to accept management's distributable earnings framing to value it. For BX, blackstone's risks stem from its market-linked, cyclical model.
BN or BX: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick BN if you believe its drivers more; BX if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the BN and BX guides.
BN vs BX: the full fundamentals
BN. First quarter 2026 revenue was ~$18.6 billion with net income of ~$1.04 billion, against ~$215 million a year earlier, so the year-over-year jump reflects mark movements more than a step change in operations. The reported P/E near ~86x is not a like-for-like multiple: depreciation on infrastructure and the share of consolidated profit belonging to outside partners both sit between revenue and attributable earnings. Second quarter 2026 results are scheduled for August 13, 2026, with consensus around ~$0.65 per share before the release.
BX. These figures are qualitative and approximate as of the asOf date, not precise real-time numbers. Because performance fees and the variable dividend move with realizations and markets, quarterly results can be uneven. Confirm live AUM, revenue, fee-related earnings, dividend, and valuation before acting.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): BN shows share price / market cap ~$44 per share, ~$101 billion (Aug 7, 2026 close), revenue (ttm) ~$79 billion, net income attributable (ttm) ~$1.2 billion, a reported P/E near ~86x, distributable earnings (q1 2026) ~$1.6 billion, ~$0.66 per share (~$1.4 billion before realizations); BX shows assets under management More than $1.3 trillion as of early 2026, the largest of any alternative asset manager, after record inflows (roughly $70 billion in a recent quarter), revenue trend Full-year 2025 revenue was about $14.5 billion, up roughly $1.2 billion year over year; management and advisory fees were about $8.1 billion, profitability Emphasizes fee-related earnings (recurring management fees) as the stable core, with performance fees (carried interest) adding lumpier upside tied to realizations, capital returns Pays a variable quarterly dividend tied to distributable earnings (not a fixed rate) plus buybacks, so the payout rises and falls with results.
The bottom line: BN vs BX
BN and BX are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BN and BX exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how BN or BX fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Brookfield Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between BN and BX?
+
Brookfield Corporation sits at the top of the Brookfield group and reports through three pillars. Blackstone Inc. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is BN or BX the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. BX is the larger incumbent; BN is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, BN or BX?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), BN trades at 7.51x and BX at 17.11x, so BN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both BN and BX?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of BN vs BX?
+
BN: The reported financials are hard to underwrite: consolidation pulls in revenue and debt from entities BN does not fully own, so ~$79 billion of trailing revenue and ~$1.2 billion of attributable net income describe the same company, and an investor has to accept management's distributable earnings framing to value it. Leverage sits mostly at the asset level in non-recourse form, which limits contagion but leaves refinancing exposed to long rates and credit spreads across hundreds of separate structures. The office and retail real estate book has already required writedowns and remains the least liquid piece. The insurance pillar introduces a different risk set entirely: spread compression if rates fall, reserve assumptions on long-dated annuities, and regulators in multiple jurisdictions reviewing private-capital ownership of annuity liabilities. Carried interest and realization gains depend on exit markets that shut for long stretches, and BN's ~1.8 beta means the stock has historically fallen harder than the index when they do. BX: Blackstone's risks stem from its market-linked, cyclical model. Fundraising and deal activity slow when markets are volatile, interest rates are high, or investors pull back, which can crimp both management-fee growth and the realizations that drive performance fees. Performance fees (carried interest) are inherently lumpy and can swing distributable earnings and the variable dividend from quarter to quarter, so the payout is not fixed. Real estate remains a large exposure, and stress in commercial property or elevated rates can pressure valuations and prompt redemption requests in semi-liquid vehicles; Blackstone has faced redemption caps in its perpetual real estate fund during past stress. Rising rates raise the bar for private-market returns and can compress asset values. The business is also exposed to regulatory scrutiny of private markets, retail alternatives, and carried-interest taxation. Finally, as a leveraged play on private-market growth, the stock tends to be more volatile than the broad market.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell BN or BX; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.