BOKF vs RF: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
BOKF and RF are similarly sized, but RF trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (10.88x vs 13.24x): the market is paying up for BOKF's profile and pricing RF more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
BOKF vs RF: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | BOKF | RF | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E | 13.24 | 10.88 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 13.32 | 12.58 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.79 | 1.01 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 95% of range | 84% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 1.41 | 1.51 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: RF is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how BOKF and RF affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BOKF and RF share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BOKF and RF exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) do?
BOK Financial Corporation is the holding company for BOKF, NA, a regional bank headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and one of the 50 largest financial services firms in the United States. It operates across Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arkansas, Colorado, Arizona, Kansas, and Missouri through three segments: Commercial Banking, Consumer Banking, and Wealth Management. Beyond traditional lending and deposits, BOKF runs the TransFund electronic funds transfer network, a sizable brokerage and trading operation, and fiduciary and asset-management businesses, giving it a heavier fee-income mix than many similarly sized banks.
What does Regions Financial Corporation (RF) do?
Regions Financial Corporation is one of the largest US regional banks, headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, with roughly 1,250 branches concentrated across the South, Midwest, and Texas. It operates three main segments: Consumer Banking (checking, savings, mortgages, and consumer lending), Corporate Banking (commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate, and treasury management), and Wealth Management. As of Q1 2026 it carried about ~$132 billion in deposits and ~$98 billion in loans (Q1 2026), and it earns most of its money the classic banking way: the spread between what it pays on deposits and what it earns on loans and securities, plus fee income from treasury management, capital markets, wealth, and card services.
BOKF vs RF: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- BOKF drivers: Broad-based loan growth; Diversified fee income.
- RF drivers: Net interest margin and rate positioning; Loan growth in a growing footprint.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: As a regional bank, BOKF is exposed to interest-rate swings that can compress net interest margin, which was near 2.90% in early 2026. For RF, as a regional bank, Regions is cyclical and exposed to the interest-rate path: falling rates can compress its margin, while sharp rate moves can pressure deposit costs and securities values.
BOKF or RF: which should you pick?
BOKF vs RF: the full fundamentals
BOKF. In the first quarter of 2026 BOKF earned about $155.8 million, or $2.58 per diluted share, up meaningfully from $1.86 a year earlier, on revenue of roughly $554 million. The stock traded around a mid-teens price-to-earnings ratio, typical for a well-capitalized regional bank, with a dividend near $0.63 per quarter. Net interest income of about $345 million and net interest margin near 2.90% anchored results alongside strong fee income.
RF. As of April 2026, Regions traded at a market capitalization of roughly ~$24 billion, a typical valuation range for a profitable super-regional bank. Its ~$1.06 annual dividend (yield near ~3.8%) and 13-year streak of increases make income a meaningful part of the return. Bank valuations are usually framed on price-to-tangible-book and price-to-earnings, and Regions' record ~18.26% return on tangible common equity in Q1 2026 is what supports its multiple.
Headline figures (approximate, MARCH 2026): BOKF shows revenue (q1 2026) ~$554M, net income (q1 2026) ~$156M, diluted eps (q1 2026) ~$2.58, total assets ~$53.8B; RF shows revenue (ttm) ~$7.4 billion, q1 2026 total revenue ~$1.87 billion, q1 2026 net income ~$539 million, q1 2026 diluted eps ~$0.62.
The bottom line: BOKF vs RF
BOKF and RF are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BOKF and RF exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how BOKF or RF fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in BOK Financial Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BOKF fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between BOKF and RF?
+
BOK Financial Corporation is the holding company for BOKF, NA, a regional bank headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and one of the 50 largest financial services firms in the United States. Regions Financial Corporation is one of the largest US regional banks, headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, with roughly 1,250 branches concentrated across the South, Midwest, and Texas. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is BOKF or RF the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, BOKF or RF?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), BOKF trades at 13.24x and RF at 10.88x, so RF is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both BOKF and RF?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of BOKF vs RF?
+
BOKF: As a regional bank, BOKF is exposed to interest-rate swings that can compress net interest margin, which was near 2.90% in early 2026. Its footprint concentrates energy-sector exposure, so a sharp downturn in oil and gas could pressure credit quality. Commercial real estate remains an industry-wide watch item, and a weaker economy could lift loan losses above the modest provision the company guides toward. Fee income tied to brokerage and trading can also be volatile with market conditions, and competition from larger national banks and fintechs pressures deposit pricing and pricing power. RF: As a regional bank, Regions is cyclical and exposed to the interest-rate path: falling rates can compress its margin, while sharp rate moves can pressure deposit costs and securities values. Credit quality is a standing risk, with net charge-offs at ~0.54% and nonperforming loans at ~0.71% in Q1 2026, both of which could deteriorate in a recession, particularly in commercial real estate. The 2023 regional-bank stress episode showed how quickly deposit confidence and funding can become the market's focus. Geographic concentration in the Southeast is a growth tailwind but also a source of correlated exposure to that region's economy. Regulatory capital rules, competition from larger money-center banks, and fintech disruption of fee lines round out the risks.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell BOKF or RF; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.