BTBT vs SBET: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated November 2026
Short answer
SBET is the larger of the two ($1.42B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (-109.17x forward earnings, beta 11.18). BTBT is the smaller challenger ($271.85M): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
BTBT vs SBET: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of November 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | BTBT | SBET | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $271.85M | $1.42B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Beta | 3.51 | 11.18 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 0% of range | 23% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 0.69 | 1.01 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Before you buy: how BTBT and SBET affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BTBT and SBET share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BTBT and SBET exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Bit Digital (BTBT) do?
Bit Digital, Inc. (Nasdaq: BTBT) is a digital-asset and infrastructure company that has undergone a major strategic transformation. It started life as a bitcoin miner, but in 2025 it repositioned itself as what it calls a strategic-asset company centered on Ethereum. By mid-2026 it held roughly 155,000 to 160,000 ETH, making it one of the largest public corporate holders of Ethereum, and a large share of that stack is staked, either natively or through liquid-staking tokens, to generate ongoing yield. This makes the company's asset base and reported results move closely with the price of ETH and with staking economics rather than with a traditional product business.
What does Sharplink (SBET) do?
Sharplink started life as SharpLink Gaming, a Minneapolis affiliate marketing business that sent sports bettors to licensed operators and collected referral fees. In mid-2025 the board named ether its primary treasury reserve asset, and the company has raised more than $3.3 billion since to buy it. Today it holds roughly 868,700 ETH, about 0.72% of all ether in existence, which makes it one of the two largest corporate holders of the asset. Joseph Lubin, a co-founder of Ethereum and the CEO of Consensys, chairs the board; Joseph Chalom, who spent two decades at BlackRock and helped launch the iShares Ethereum Trust, became sole CEO in December 2025. Substantially all of the ether is staked or held in liquid-staking form, including about $170 million deployed in January 2026 into a Linea strategy that layers restaking rewards from ether.fi on top of base staking yield under a qualified custodian. The old affiliate marketing operation still reports as a segment, but at this point it is a rounding error against the treasury.
BTBT vs SBET: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- BTBT drivers: Ethereum treasury and staking yield; AI and HPC infrastructure via WhiteFiber.
- SBET drivers: The ether price does most of the work; Staking yield is the only recurring revenue line.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The dominant risk is crypto price volatility: with the balance sheet dominated by Ethereum, a sharp ETH drawdown can slash the company's asset value and produce large mark-to-market losses, exactly the dynamic behind net losses of about $146.7 million in Q1 2026 and about $107.2 million in Q2 2026. For SBET, the dominant risk is simply ether, which fell about 68% from its 2025 peak to roughly $1,562 in March 2026 before recovering, and the equity amplified that move on the way down.
BTBT or SBET: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick BTBT if you believe its drivers more; SBET if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the BTBT and SBET guides.
BTBT vs SBET: the full fundamentals
BTBT. Bit Digital is best understood as a claim on assets (its ETH stack plus its WhiteFiber stake) more than as an earnings story, so conventional P/E and revenue multiples are of limited use; at about 0.9x book value, the market is pricing those assets at a discount. Reported net income is heavily distorted by non-cash mark-to-market and impairment charges on crypto, meaning a big loss or gain in any quarter often reflects where Ethereum traded, not operating performance. Analyst targets cluster around $3.50 to $4 versus a $1.01 share price, and third-quarter results are due November 12, 2026, with consensus revenue near $32 million; verify live ETH holdings, staking levels, and financials, because the company's strategy and balance sheet have changed rapidly.
SBET. Conventional multiples do not describe this company well: at about 34x trailing revenue it looks expensive, and at a discount to the market value of its own coins it looks cheap, and both readings can be true at once. The metric management reports against is ether per share, near 0.0041 ETH, because the whole strategy is judged on whether that figure rises over time. The practical valuation anchor most analysts use is the treasury value per share, discounted for operating costs and the absence of any redemption right; with roughly 0.0041 ETH behind each share, the $7.76 close on October 16, 2026 implies the market is valuing that ether at about $1,900 a coin before any discount, so the mNAV reading depends entirely on where ether trades that day. Q3 2026 results are expected around November 12.
Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): BTBT shows business model Strategic-asset company: Ethereum treasury plus staking yield, plus AI/HPC infrastructure through a roughly 70% stake in WhiteFiber (WYFI), ethereum holdings Roughly 155,000 to 160,000 ETH in the first half of 2026, among the largest corporate ETH treasuries; a large share is staked, revenue (ttm / q2 2026) ~$121 million / ~$32.1 million (cloud services ~$23.8 million), net income (ttm / q2 2026) ~-$292 million / ~-$107 million, about $86 million of it non-cash; SBET shows revenue (ttm) ~$50M, nearly all staking yield, revenue (q2 2026) ~$11.5M vs ~$0.7M a year earlier, net loss (q2 2026) ~$394M, incl. ~$321M unrealized ETH loss and ~$76M impairment, net loss (ttm) ~$1.71B, driven by ether marks.
The bottom line: BTBT vs SBET
BTBT and SBET are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BTBT and SBET exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how BTBT or SBET fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Bit Digital with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BTBT fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between BTBT and SBET?
+
Bit Digital, Inc. Sharplink started life as SharpLink Gaming, a Minneapolis affiliate marketing business that sent sports bettors to licensed operators and collected referral fees. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is BTBT or SBET the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. SBET is the larger incumbent; BTBT is the smaller challenger. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, BTBT or SBET?
+
A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both BTBT and SBET?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of BTBT vs SBET?
+
BTBT: The dominant risk is crypto price volatility: with the balance sheet dominated by Ethereum, a sharp ETH drawdown can slash the company's asset value and produce large mark-to-market losses, exactly the dynamic behind net losses of about $146.7 million in Q1 2026 and about $107.2 million in Q2 2026. Staking yield is not guaranteed and can fall with protocol changes, validator economics, or shifts in how much ETH is staked network-wide. The AI-infrastructure buildout through WhiteFiber is capital-intensive and unproven at scale, so it may require further financing, dilute shareholders, or fail to earn its cost of capital. The strategy also concentrates risk in a single crypto asset and depends on continued institutional acceptance of Ethereum treasuries. Regulatory uncertainty around digital assets, staking, and crypto-related securities adds another layer outside the company's control, and the stock's history of dilution and strategic pivots means past business models are a poor guide to the current one. Leverage has risen too: convertible notes total about $336.2 million, total debt is about $456 million against roughly $84 million of cash, and part of the ETH treasury now collateralizes a $50 million borrowing used to lend to WhiteFiber, which ties the two businesses' fortunes more tightly. Finally, with shares closing at $1.01 on October 16, 2026, the stock sits right at the Nasdaq's $1 minimum bid price, so a sustained move below it could bring a listing-compliance issue. SBET: The dominant risk is simply ether, which fell about 68% from its 2025 peak to roughly $1,562 in March 2026 before recovering, and the equity amplified that move on the way down. Fair-value accounting means reported earnings swing hundreds of millions of dollars a quarter on price alone, so GAAP results carry very little information about how the business is being run. Staking introduces risks a passive holder does not take, including validator slashing, smart contract failure in the liquid-staking and restaking layers, and custody concentration, and the yield enhancement strategy adds counterparty exposure to protocols outside the company's control. Dilution history is real: the share count now sits near 217 million after the capital raises that funded the treasury, and a persistent discount to net asset value limits how the company can grow the stack from here without selling coins. Trailing twelve-month GAAP net loss reached about $1.71 billion. The broader treasury-company category is crowded, sentiment toward it turned again in October 2026 when BitMine signalled its ether buying was nearly done, its discounts have widened, and there is no operating cash flow of consequence to cushion a prolonged crypto drawdown.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell BTBT or SBET; figures are approximate and dated (as of November 2026). Verify current data before investing.