CMCSA vs FOXA: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
CMCSA is the larger of the two ($85.03B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (6.61x forward earnings, beta 0.65). FOXA is the smaller challenger ($28.97B), actually pricier on forward earnings (11.92x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
CMCSA vs FOXA: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | CMCSA | FOXA | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $85.03B | $28.97B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 6.61 | 11.92 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 7.68 | 17.98 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.65 | 0.54 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 23% of range | 74% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 0.95 | 2.49 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: CMCSA is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how CMCSA and FOXA affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CMCSA and FOXA share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CMCSA and FOXA exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Comcast (CMCSA) do?
Comcast is a global media and technology company built on three main pillars. Its Connectivity and Platforms business, anchored by Xfinity, is one of the largest US broadband and cable providers, selling high-speed internet, video, mobile (Xfinity Mobile), and home services to tens of millions of households, plus business connectivity. Its Content and Experiences business includes NBCUniversal, which owns the NBC broadcast network, cable networks (USA, Bravo, MSNBC, CNBC), the Peacock streaming service, Universal Pictures film studio, and Universal theme parks worldwide. Comcast also owns Sky, a major European media and broadband operator. The company makes money primarily from recurring broadband and connectivity subscriptions, which are its most profitable and stable revenue, supplemented by advertising, content licensing, box-office and streaming revenue, and theme-park admissions. Comcast is headquartered in Philadelphia and generates substantial free cash flow that funds dividends and buybacks.
What does Fox Corporation (FOXA) do?
Fox Corporation runs two main segments. Cable Network Programming holds Fox News Media, FS1, FS2 and the Big Ten Network, and it is the profit engine: it earns affiliate fees from cable, satellite and virtual pay-TV distributors plus advertising. The Television segment holds the FOX broadcast network, the owned and operated local stations, Fox Entertainment and Tubi, and it carries most of the sports rights costs, including the NFL, MLB, college football and, in fiscal 2026, the FIFA Men's World Cup. Fox deliberately kept only content that people watch live, on the theory that live sports and live news are the last programming a distributor cannot drop and an advertiser cannot skip.
CMCSA vs FOXA: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- CMCSA drivers: Broadband cash engine; Wireless and convergence.
- FOXA drivers: Live sports as the scarce inventory; Tubi and digital advertising.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Comcast's core video business is in secular decline as cord-cutting erodes traditional cable-TV subscribers, and broadband subscriber growth has stalled or turned negative under heavy competition from fiber overbuilders (AT and T, others) and fixed-wireless from T-Mobile and Verizon. For FOXA, the central structural risk is pay-TV subscriber decline: distribution revenue was roughly flat in fiscal 2026 because higher affiliate rates only just offset subscriber losses, and rate increases cannot outrun that erosion forever.
CMCSA or FOXA: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CMCSA if you believe its drivers more; FOXA if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CMCSA and FOXA guides.
CMCSA vs FOXA: the full fundamentals
CMCSA. Comcast trades at a low earnings multiple relative to the market, reflecting investor concern about cord-cutting, slowing broadband growth, and media disruption. The bull case rests on a high-margin broadband cash engine, growing wireless and theme parks, a solid dividend yield, and aggressive buybacks. The cheap valuation is the market pricing structural decline against still-robust cash generation.
FOXA. Figures are approximate, tied to the August 2026 asOf date, and worth checking live before acting on them. Fox has historically traded at a discount to media peers on earnings and cash flow, which reflects the market's discount for a shrinking affiliate base rather than a discount for poor execution. The trailing multiple also flatters fiscal 2026, because that year carried the FIFA Men's World Cup, and the Roku acquisition will materially change both the share count and the debt load once it closes.
Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): CMCSA shows revenue (ttm) ~$120 billion, operating margin ~18-20%, net income (ttm) ~$15 billion, dividend yield ~3-3.5%; FOXA shows revenue (ttm, fiscal year ended june 2026) ~$17.13 billion, net income (fy2026) ~$1.73 billion, adjusted ebitda (fy2026) ~$3.91 billion, q4 fy2026 revenue ~$4.21 billion, up ~28% year over year.
The bottom line: CMCSA vs FOXA
CMCSA and FOXA are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CMCSA and FOXA exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how CMCSA or FOXA fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Comcast with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how CMCSA fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between CMCSA and FOXA?
+
Comcast is a global media and technology company built on three main pillars. Fox Corporation runs two main segments. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is CMCSA or FOXA the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. CMCSA is the larger incumbent; FOXA is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, CMCSA or FOXA?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), CMCSA trades at 6.61x and FOXA at 11.92x, so CMCSA is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both CMCSA and FOXA?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of CMCSA vs FOXA?
+
CMCSA: Comcast's core video business is in secular decline as cord-cutting erodes traditional cable-TV subscribers, and broadband subscriber growth has stalled or turned negative under heavy competition from fiber overbuilders (AT and T, others) and fixed-wireless from T-Mobile and Verizon. Streaming (Peacock) remains less profitable than the legacy bundle, and content and sports-rights costs are high. The cable-network spin-off carries execution and value-realization risk. High capital intensity for network upgrades, advertising cyclicality, theme-park sensitivity to consumer spending, and a large debt load all weigh on the outlook. The stock often trades at a low multiple reflecting these growth and disruption concerns. FOXA: The central structural risk is pay-TV subscriber decline: distribution revenue was roughly flat in fiscal 2026 because higher affiliate rates only just offset subscriber losses, and rate increases cannot outrun that erosion forever. Advertising is cyclical and, in Fox's case, unusually lumpy, since fiscal 2026 included a FIFA Men's World Cup that does not recur and the Super Bowl rotates among networks on a multi-year cycle, so year-over-year comparisons can mislead in both directions. Sports rights costs inflate at every renewal, and competing bidders now include Amazon, Apple, Netflix and YouTube, which have deeper balance sheets and different reasons to pay. The Roku transaction adds integration risk, regulatory risk and roughly $12 billion of new debt to a company that previously ran conservatively, and the stock consideration means the deal's value to existing holders depends on where FOXA trades at close. Fox also carries elevated legal exposure at its news unit following the 2023 Dominion Voting Systems settlement, with related matters including the Smartmatic case still outstanding, and the dual-class structure leaves voting control with the Murdoch Family Trust, so FOXA holders have economic exposure without a meaningful vote.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell CMCSA or FOXA; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.