COST vs NKE: How Costco Wholesale and Nike Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: NKE is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. COST and NKE share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined COST and NKE exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Costco Wholesale operates a membership-based warehouse club chain. Members pay an annual fee (currently $65 for basic Gold Star, $130 for Executive) for access to Costco warehouses, where they can buy products at lower markups than traditional retailers. Costco operates approximately 900 warehouses globally, with the largest concentration in the United States plus meaningful presence in Canada, Mexico, the UK, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and other markets.

Full COST guide

Nike is the world's largest athletic footwear and apparel company, designing, marketing, and selling shoes, clothing, and equipment under the Nike and Jordan brands, plus Converse. Nike does not own most of its manufacturing: it outsources production to contract factories largely in Asia and focuses on design, branding, and marketing, where its swoosh logo and athlete endorsements give it unrivaled brand power. Revenue comes from two channels: wholesale (selling to retailers like Foot Locker and Dick's Sporting Goods) and Nike Direct (its own stores, the Nike app, and Nike.com), the latter carrying higher margins and direct customer relationships. The Jordan Brand is a major profit engine on its own. Nike's competitive advantages are its brand, scale, marketing reach, and innovation in performance products. In recent years the company has worked through challenges including a costly shift toward direct-to-consumer that strained wholesale partnerships, inventory and discounting issues, and competition from newer brands. Founded in 1964 (as Blue Ribbon Sports) and headquartered in Beaverton, Oregon, Nike is a large-cap consumer brand and Dividend Aristocrat undergoing a turnaround.

Full NKE guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• COST drivers: Membership fee growth; International expansion.
• NKE drivers: Dominant global brand; Direct-to-consumer and digital.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Costco's premium valuation embeds high expectations for continued same-store sales growth and margin expansion. For NKE, nike has faced disappointing growth, inventory and discounting pressure, and self-inflicted wounds from an overaggressive direct-to-consumer pivot that alienated wholesale partners.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick COST if you believe its drivers more; NKE if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the COST and NKE guides.

COST. Costco trades at one of the highest P/E ratios in retail, reflecting the durable membership model, consistent same-store sales growth, and the long runway for international expansion. The premium is also driven by Costco being widely viewed as a quality compounder in retail. The valuation has compressed historically only during severe market drawdowns.

NKE. Nike trades at a valuation that has compressed from its premium highs, reflecting slowing growth, margin pressure, and competitive share losses, balanced against an iconic brand and a long dividend-growth record. The multiple embeds expectations for a turnaround in growth and margins. It has historically re-rated when innovation and full-price selling recovered and stayed subdued during execution stumbles.

Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): COST shows revenue (ttm) ~$260 billion, operating margin ~3.5% (low, by design; membership fees are the profit lever), net income (ttm) ~$7.5 billion, eps (ttm) ~$17.00; NKE shows revenue (ttm) ~$48 billion, gross margin ~43-44% (pressured by discounting; targeted to recover), operating margin ~10-12%, eps (ttm) ~$3.00, down from prior peaks.

COST and NKE are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined COST and NKE exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.