CPRI vs LVMUY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: CPRI is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CPRI and LVMUY share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CPRI and LVMUY exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Capri Holdings (NYSE: CPRI) is a global fashion luxury group that, following the completed sale of Versace to Prada for about $1.375 billion in December 2025, now operates two brands: accessible-luxury label Michael Kors and British footwear-and-accessories house Jimmy Choo. Michael Kors is the anchor, generating the large majority of revenue through handbags, apparel, watches and licensed products across retail, wholesale and licensing channels worldwide. Jimmy Choo is a smaller, higher-end shoe and accessories brand that has been running at an operating loss.

Full CPRI guide

LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE (LVMUY) is the world's largest luxury-goods company, a French group that owns a portfolio of more than 75 prestige houses across five business groups: Fashion & Leather Goods (Louis Vuitton, Dior, Loewe, Celine, Fendi), Wines & Spirits (Moët & Chandon, Dom Pérignon, Hennessy), Perfumes & Cosmetics (Dior, Guerlain), Watches & Jewelry (Tiffany & Co., Bvlgari, TAG Heuer), and Selective Retailing (Sephora, DFS). It makes money by designing, producing, and selling high-margin luxury products, with Fashion & Leather Goods acting as the profit engine: in 2025 that division alone generated about 37.8 billion euros of revenue and roughly 13.2 billion euros of recurring operating profit at a 35% margin, well over half of group profit. LVMUY trades in the US as an over-the-counter ADR where each receipt equals one-fifth of an LVMH ordinary share, which lists in Paris as MC.PA.

Full LVMUY guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• CPRI drivers: Post-Versace deleveraging; Michael Kors margin recovery.
• LVMUY drivers: Fashion & Leather Goods is the engine; A diversified luxury portfolio.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Both remaining brands have been shrinking, and there is no guarantee the guided reacceleration materializes if accessible-luxury demand stays weak. For LVMUY, lVMH is exposed to luxury cyclicality: discretionary demand falls in downturns, and 2025 showed how quickly sales and profit can decline.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CPRI if you believe its drivers more; LVMUY if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CPRI and LVMUY guides.

CPRI. Fiscal 2026 revenue of about $3.47 billion continued a multi-year decline, and the trailing period carried large impairment and divestiture losses that pushed reported net income deeply negative. The forward story rests on fiscal 2027 guidance for modest revenue growth, roughly $190 million of operating income and about $2.15 of EPS. At a market cap near $2.3 billion, the stock trades as a depressed, show-me turnaround.

LVMUY. Reading a luxury compounder like LVMH centers on organic (constant-currency, like-for-like) revenue growth and operating margins rather than headline reported figures, because acquisitions and the euro distort the top line. Fashion & Leather Goods margins above 30% and a roughly 22% group margin even in a soft year show the durability of the business. Note the share structure when comparing prices: the LVMUY ADR represents one-fifth of an LVMH ordinary share, so its quote and per-ADR dividend are about one-fifth of the Paris-listed ordinary share (MC.PA), and the more thinly traded LVMHF counter represents a full ordinary share.

Headline figures (approximate, JULY 2026): CPRI shows revenue (fy2026) ~$3.47B, q4 fy2026 revenue ~$796M, fy2027 revenue guidance ~$3.525B, fy2027 eps guidance ~$2.15; LVMUY shows revenue (fy2025) ~80.8 billion euros, down ~5% on a reported basis with sales stabilizing in H2, organic growth (fy2025) broadly flat to slightly negative for the year; Q3 ~-3%, Q4 back to low-single-digit growth, recurring operating profit ~17.8 billion euros, an operating margin of ~22%, net profit (group share) ~10.9 billion euros, down roughly 13% year over year.

CPRI and LVMUY are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CPRI and LVMUY exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.