CW vs HII: How Curtiss-Wright and Huntington Ingalls Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: HII is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CW and HII share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CW and HII exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Curtiss-Wright is a diversified industrial company that designs and manufactures highly engineered products for the aerospace and defense, commercial nuclear power, and general industrial markets. The company traces its roots to aviation pioneers Glenn Curtiss and the Wright brothers, but today it makes flow control systems, electronic components, sensors, actuators, and embedded computing for demanding applications. A large share of revenue comes from defense programs, including naval propulsion systems for US Navy submarines and aircraft carriers, where Curtiss-Wright holds entrenched sole-source positions. In commercial nuclear, it supplies pumps, valves, and reactor coolant equipment, and it is positioned for the small modular reactor buildout. The general industrial segment serves sensors, surface technologies, and industrial automation. Curtiss-Wright generates revenue through long-cycle program contracts, aftermarket parts, and service, with much of its defense and nuclear work protected by qualification barriers and multi-year backlogs. It is headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina.

Full CW guide

Huntington Ingalls Industries is the largest military shipbuilder in the United States. It designs, builds, and maintains the most complex naval vessels in the US fleet, including nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, amphibious assault ships, and surface combatants. The company operates two principal shipyards: Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia, which is the only US builder of nuclear aircraft carriers and one of two builders of nuclear submarines, and Ingalls Shipbuilding in Mississippi, which builds amphibious and surface ships. A third segment, Mission Technologies, provides defense and federal technology services including unmanned systems, cyber, and intelligence support. HII makes money almost entirely from the US Navy and government through long-cycle contracts that span years or decades, giving it deep visibility into future revenue via a large backlog. Spun off from Northrop Grumman in 2011 and headquartered in Newport News, Virginia, HII occupies a near-monopoly position in critical naval shipbuilding.

Full HII guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• CW drivers: Naval defense content; Commercial nuclear and SMRs.
• HII drivers: Irreplaceable shipyards; Long backlog and submarine demand.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Curtiss-Wright depends heavily on US defense budgets and naval shipbuilding schedules, which can slip and are subject to political appropriations risk. For HII, hII depends almost entirely on the US government, so budget delays, continuing resolutions, or shifts in defense priorities directly affect it.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CW if you believe its drivers more; HII if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CW and HII guides.

CW. Curtiss-Wright trades at a premium multiple relative to broad industrials, reflecting its defense and nuclear backlog, sole-source positions, and consistent margin expansion. The financial profile is steady rather than explosive: durable long-cycle revenue, strong cash conversion, and disciplined capital returns through buybacks and a small but growing dividend.

HII. HII trades at a moderate valuation relative to broad defense peers, reflecting thinner shipbuilding margins, capital intensity, and a history of program cost pressure, balanced against an essentially irreplaceable strategic position and a large multi-year backlog. The market tends to value the durability and backlog visibility while discounting for execution and margin risk inherent in complex naval construction.

Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): CW shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.2 billion, operating margin ~18%, net income (ttm) ~$0.45 billion, revenue growth High-single-digit to low-double-digit; HII shows revenue (ttm) ~$12 billion, operating margin ~7%, net income (ttm) ~$550 million, p/e (ttm) ~17x.

CW and HII are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CW and HII exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.