DD vs SHW: How DuPont de Nemours and Sherwin-Williams Compare (2026)
Last updated July 2026
Short answer
SHW is the larger of the two ($84.45B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (25.69x forward earnings, beta 1.10). DD is the smaller challenger ($18.51B), cheaper on forward earnings (18.09x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
DD vs SHW: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | DD | SHW | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $18.51B | $84.45B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 18.09 | 25.69 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 120.23 | 32.86 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.08 | 1.10 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 71% of range | 59% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 1.33 | 18.34 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: DD is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how DD and SHW affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. DD and SHW share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined DD and SHW exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does DuPont de Nemours (DD) do?
DuPont de Nemours is a diversified specialty chemicals and materials company. After the 2019 split of DowDuPont into three companies (Dow, DuPont, Corteva), DuPont retained the specialty materials businesses. The company has further restructured through multiple spinoffs and divestitures and is currently in the process of separating into three independent public companies: Electronics (semiconductor materials and interconnect solutions), Water (water purification and treatment), and Industrial (specialty industrial materials).
What does Sherwin-Williams (SHW) do?
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) is one of the world's largest paint and coatings companies. Its most valuable asset is a vast network of company-operated paint stores across the United States and beyond, where professional painters and contractors buy architectural paint, supplies, and color-matching services. This store network gives Sherwin-Williams direct relationships with the pros who drive repeat, high-margin demand and is a major competitive moat that is hard to replicate.
DD vs SHW: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- DD drivers: Three-way separation execution; Electronics business AI semiconductor exposure.
- SHW drivers: Company-owned store moat; Pricing power and margins.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Separation execution complexity. For SHW, sherwin-Williams is cyclical, exposed to housing, construction, and consumer spending, so a downturn in home turnover, renovation, or new building pressures volumes.
DD or SHW: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick DD if you believe its drivers more; SHW if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the DD and SHW guides.
DD vs SHW: the full fundamentals
DD. DuPont's current valuation reflects sum-of-parts expectations across the three pending separation entities. The Electronics business in particular is expected to trade at semiconductor-supply-chain multiples (~30-40x) post-separation. The implicit conglomerate discount is the central thesis.
SHW. Sherwin-Williams trades at a premium valuation reflecting its quality, pricing power, store-network moat, and consistent compounding rather than rapid growth. The multiple embeds confidence in margin recovery and steady capital returns, so the stock is sensitive to housing cycles, raw-material costs, and any sign of decelerating volumes or margin pressure.
Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): DD shows revenue (ttm) ~$12 billion, operating margin ~18%, net income (ttm) ~$1 billion (GAAP, affected by restructuring), eps (ttm) ~$2.30; SHW shows revenue (ttm) ~$23 billion, operating margin ~17-18%, net income (ttm) Several billion dollars, p/e (ttm) ~30x (premium multiple).
The bottom line: DD vs SHW
DD and SHW are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined DD and SHW exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Investing in DuPont de Nemours with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DD fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between DD and SHW?
+
DuPont de Nemours is a diversified specialty chemicals and materials company. Sherwin-Williams (SHW) is one of the world's largest paint and coatings companies. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is DD or SHW the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. SHW is the larger incumbent; DD is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, DD or SHW?
+
On forward P/E (as of July 2026), DD trades at 18.09x and SHW at 25.69x, so DD is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both DD and SHW?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of DD vs SHW?
+
DD: Separation execution complexity. Tax implications of the separation structure. Cyclical exposure in specialty industrials. Customer concentration in Electronics (the major semiconductor manufacturers). SHW: Sherwin-Williams is cyclical, exposed to housing, construction, and consumer spending, so a downturn in home turnover, renovation, or new building pressures volumes. Raw-material costs (resins, titanium dioxide, solvents) can spike and squeeze margins until pricing catches up. The shares typically trade at a premium valuation reflecting quality, leaving little room for disappointment if growth slows or margins compress. The Performance Coatings and Consumer segments face industrial cyclicality and competitive pressure. Higher interest rates can dampen housing activity, a key demand driver. Large acquisitions (such as Valspar) carry integration risk, and the company carries debt from such deals. Premium multiple plus cyclicality means meaningful downside in weak demand environments.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell DD or SHW; figures are approximate and dated (as of July 2026). Verify current data before investing.