DTM vs KMI: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
KMI is the larger of the two ($71.48B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (20.88x forward earnings, beta 0.55). DTM is the smaller challenger ($13.26B), actually pricier on forward earnings (26.54x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
DTM vs KMI: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | DTM | KMI | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $13.26B | $71.48B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 26.54 | 20.88 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 28.51 | 20.71 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.73 | 0.55 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 55% of range | 71% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.77 | 2.26 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: KMI is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how DTM and KMI affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. DTM and KMI share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined DTM and KMI exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does DT Midstream (DTM) do?
DT Midstream is a U.S. natural gas midstream company that became a standalone public entity in 2021 when it was spun off from DTE Energy. It owns and operates pipelines, gathering systems, compression, and storage that connect major supply basins, principally the Haynesville in Louisiana and the Appalachian region, to utilities, power generators, industrial users, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals on the Gulf Coast. The business runs across two reporting segments: a Pipeline segment (interstate and intrastate transmission plus storage, including assets like LEAP and Stonewall) and a Gathering segment (including the Blue Union system in the Haynesville), and its revenue is heavily weighted toward long-term, fee-based contracts that reduce direct exposure to natural gas prices.
What does Kinder Morgan (KMI) do?
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI) is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America, operating over 80,000 miles of pipelines and a portfolio of storage and terminal facilities. Its four business segments are Natural Gas Pipelines (the dominant driver), Products Pipelines, Terminals, and CO2. The Natural Gas Pipelines segment transports roughly 40% of all U.S. natural gas consumption and moves approximately 8 billion cubic feet per day to LNG export facilities, with contracted volumes expected to grow to nearly 12 Bcf per day by end of 2028. The company earns the vast majority of its revenue through long-term, fee-based contracts rather than direct commodity exposure, which gives cash flows a utility-like stability.
DTM vs KMI: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- DTM drivers: LNG and power-demand pull; Haynesville gathering growth.
- KMI drivers: LNG Export Tailwind; Power and Data-Center Demand.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: DTM is concentrated in dry natural gas and two core basins, so a sustained downturn in Haynesville or Appalachian drilling, or weaker gas demand, would pressure volumes and growth. For KMI, kMI carries approximately $32 billion in net debt, and a debt-to-equity ratio of roughly 1.06 is well above the midstream industry average, meaning that higher-for-longer interest rates or any refinancing at elevated costs could add hundreds of millions of dollars in annual interest expense and compress margins.
DTM or KMI: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick DTM if you believe its drivers more; KMI if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the DTM and KMI guides.
DTM vs KMI: the full fundamentals
DTM. DTM trades at a premium midstream multiple, reflecting its pure-play natural gas focus and visible growth backlog rather than a value profile. Q1 2026 revenue of about $336 million rose roughly 11% year over year, and adjusted EBITDA was about $308 million for the quarter. The company reaffirmed full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance and offered a higher 2027 outlook, underpinning its dividend-growth framing.
KMI. KMI's P/E of approximately 23 times is modestly above the broader energy sector average but below higher-growth midstream peers such as Williams Companies, which traded at roughly 34 times earnings as of mid-2025. The EV/EBITDA of approximately 13 times reflects the market's recognition of stable, contracted cash flows but also a balance sheet that carries roughly $32 billion in net debt at a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of 3.8 times. Investors in fee-based midstream companies typically weigh dividend yield and distributable cash flow coverage alongside traditional earnings multiples, since GAAP net income can understate actual cash generation at capital-intensive pipeline operators.
Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): DTM shows revenue (ttm) ~$1.3B, q1 2026 revenue ~$336M, adj. ebitda (2026 guide) ~$1.16B to $1.23B, market cap ~$14.5B; KMI shows revenue (q4 2025, quarterly) ~$4.51 billion, revenue (q1 2025, quarterly) ~$4.24 billion, adjusted ebitda (fy 2025) ~$8.3 billion, adjusted ebitda (fy 2026 budget) ~$8.6 billion.
The bottom line: DTM vs KMI
DTM and KMI are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined DTM and KMI exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how DTM or KMI fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in DT Midstream with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DTM fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between DTM and KMI?
+
DT Midstream is a U.S. Kinder Morgan, Inc. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is DTM or KMI the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. KMI is the larger incumbent; DTM is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, DTM or KMI?
+
On forward P/E (as of September 2026), DTM trades at 26.54x and KMI at 20.88x, so KMI is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both DTM and KMI?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of DTM vs KMI?
+
DTM: DTM is concentrated in dry natural gas and two core basins, so a sustained downturn in Haynesville or Appalachian drilling, or weaker gas demand, would pressure volumes and growth. The company funds expansion partly with debt, so higher interest rates or execution delays on backlog projects raise financial risk. Its valuation sits at a premium (a normalized P/E in the low 30s), which leaves little room for disappointment if growth slows or LNG demand ramps more slowly than expected. Regulatory, permitting, and environmental constraints on new pipeline capacity are a persistent overhang, and much of its revenue depends on the credit quality and continued activity of a concentrated set of producer and utility counterparties. KMI: KMI carries approximately $32 billion in net debt, and a debt-to-equity ratio of roughly 1.06 is well above the midstream industry average, meaning that higher-for-longer interest rates or any refinancing at elevated costs could add hundreds of millions of dollars in annual interest expense and compress margins. The CO2 segment remains a structural headwind as production from enhanced oil recovery fields declines and lower commodity prices weigh on results. Regulatory risk is real: FERC permitting delays on key projects such as SSE4 and Mississippi Crossing could push out expected backlog contributions and disappoint investors counting on near-term growth. Finally, a faster-than-expected energy transition or policy changes that disadvantage natural gas infrastructure could impair the long-term value of KMI's asset base.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell DTM or KMI; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.