ED vs NEE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

ED and NEE are similarly sized, but ED trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (16.77x vs 19.67x): the market is paying up for NEE's profile and pricing ED more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.

ED vs NEE: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricEDNEEWhat it tells you
Forward P/E16.7719.67Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E18.3619.53Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.260.67Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range65% of range60% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.

Reading it: ED is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how ED and NEE affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ED and NEE share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ED and NEE exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Consolidated Edison (ED) do?

Consolidated Edison, Inc. is a holding company whose main subsidiary, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, delivers regulated electricity, natural gas, and steam to New York City and Westchester County. A second utility, Orange and Rockland, serves nearby areas, and the company also holds FERC-regulated electric transmission investments. Because it operates as a regulated monopoly in its service territory, Con Edison does not compete for customers: instead, state and federal regulators set the rates it can charge and the return it can earn on the capital it invests, which makes its revenue and earnings unusually predictable compared with most companies.

Full ED guide

What does NextEra Energy (NEE) do?

NextEra Energy runs two very different businesses under one holding company. Florida Power & Light is a regulated electric utility serving roughly twelve million people across Florida; it earns an authorized return on the capital it invests in poles, wires, generation, and storage, so its profit grows as it grows its rate base, which expanded about ~8.8% year over year in early 2026. NextEra Energy Resources (NEER) is the competitive arm and the world's largest generator of electricity from wind and solar; it develops, builds, and operates clean-energy and battery-storage projects, selling power and capacity largely under long-term contracts to utilities, corporations, and data-center customers. The regulated utility provides steady, rate-regulated cash flow while the resources segment supplies higher-growth, contracted renewables and storage development.

Full NEE guide

ED vs NEE: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • ED drivers: Large approved rate-base investment plan; Electrification and clean-energy transition in New York.
  • NEE drivers: Record renewables and storage backlog; Data-center and AI power demand.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The biggest risks are regulatory and interest-rate driven. For NEE, nextEra is highly capital-intensive and carries substantial debt to fund construction, which makes it sensitive to interest rates: higher rates raise its borrowing costs and tend to compress the valuations investors assign to utility and renewable-growth stocks.

ED or NEE: which should you pick?

Pick ED if you believe its drivers more; NEE if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ED and NEE guides.

ED vs NEE: the full fundamentals

ED. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live numbers before acting. Utilities like Con Edison are usually valued on dividend yield and price-to-earnings relative to peers rather than on rapid growth, so the key questions are whether regulators keep approving investment, where interest rates head, and how the yield compares with bonds. A below-consensus adjusted EPS quarter and a large equity raise are worth watching against the reaffirmed full-year guidance.

NEE. As of late June 2026, NEE traded near the high-$80s per share with a market cap around ~$184B to ~$186B. The forward P/E of roughly ~23x sits below its own five-year average closer to ~27x but at a premium to several utility peers, a gap the market ties to its ~33 GW backlog and growth profile. Figures are approximate, drawn from the Q1 2026 release and public market data, and move with the share price.

Headline figures (approximate, Jul 2026): ED shows revenue trend Q1 2026 revenue ~$5.1 billion, up ~6% year over year; steady, regulator-driven growth rather than fast expansion, profitability Q1 2026 net income for common stock ~$924 million (~$2.55 per share); adjusted EPS ~$2.17 came in below consensus, full-year guidance Reaffirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of ~$6.00 to $6.20, balance sheet / financing Capital-intensive with significant debt; funding growth partly via a ~$2 billion at-the-market equity program, which can dilute holders; NEE shows revenue (ttm) ~$27.9B, adjusted eps guidance (fy2026) ~$3.92 to ~$4.02, dividend yield ~2.7%, adjusted eps growth target ~8%-plus per year through 2032.

The bottom line: ED vs NEE

ED and NEE are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ED and NEE exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how ED or NEE fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Consolidated Edison with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ED fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between ED and NEE?

+

Consolidated Edison, Inc. NextEra Energy runs two very different businesses under one holding company. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is ED or NEE the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, ED or NEE?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), ED trades at 16.77x and NEE at 19.67x, so ED is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both ED and NEE?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of ED vs NEE?

+

ED: The biggest risks are regulatory and interest-rate driven. Because rates and allowed returns are set by the New York Public Service Commission, an unfavorable rate case or a lower authorized return on equity can directly cap earnings growth. As a capital-intensive utility, Con Edison carries substantial debt and funds growth partly by issuing equity, such as the 2026 $2 billion at-the-market program, which can dilute existing shareholders. It is also interest-rate sensitive: when bond yields rise, income investors may sell utility shares in favor of safer yields, pressuring the stock even if the business is healthy. Extreme weather, storm-restoration costs, aging infrastructure, and the pace and cost of New York's electrification mandates add operational and execution risk on top of these financial pressures. NEE: NextEra is highly capital-intensive and carries substantial debt to fund construction, which makes it sensitive to interest rates: higher rates raise its borrowing costs and tend to compress the valuations investors assign to utility and renewable-growth stocks. A meaningful share of NextEra Energy Resources' economics has historically depended on federal clean-energy tax credits and supportive policy, so changes to subsidies, tariffs on imported equipment, or permitting can pressure project returns and the development pipeline. The renewables and storage backlog also exposes the company to supply-chain, interconnection, and execution timing risk, and the dividend-growth and earnings targets assume that build-out continues roughly on plan.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ED or NEE; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    ED vs NEE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App