EPD vs RRC: How Enterprise Products Partners and Range Resources Corporation Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: RRC is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. EPD and RRC share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined EPD and RRC exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Enterprise Products Partners operates one of the most integrated midstream systems in North America, with tens of thousands of miles of pipelines plus storage, natural gas processing, NGL fractionation, and marine export terminals along the Gulf Coast. The bulk of its cash flow is fee-based, meaning it earns fees for moving and handling volumes rather than taking direct commodity price bets, which historically has produced more stable cash flow than producers. In the first quarter of 2026 the partnership reported record NGL fractionation volumes of about 1.9 million barrels per day and roughly 2.7 billion dollars of EBITDA, up about 10 percent year over year, helped by newly commissioned assets such as the Bahia NGL pipeline and the Neches River export terminal.

Full EPD guide

Range Resources Corporation is a Fort Worth-based independent energy company that produces natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and a small amount of oil. Its operations are concentrated in the Appalachian region, with its principal area being the Marcellus Shale in southwest Pennsylvania, where it controls roughly 763,000 net acres with a high average working interest. Natural gas accounts for more than two-thirds of production, while its liquids-rich acreage yields NGLs, a higher-value product generally linked to oil prices, which helps differentiate its price realizations from dry-gas-only peers. The company markets its production across multiple regions and export channels, which has at times let it capture pricing premiums to benchmark hubs.

Full RRC guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• EPD drivers: A 27-year distribution-growth streak; Fee-based, volume-driven cash flow.
• RRC drivers: Low-cost, liquids-rich Appalachian acreage; Strong cash flow and debt reduction.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: EPD's volumes and some margins are still tied to commodity production and global energy demand, so a sustained downturn in oil, natural gas, or NGL activity could pressure cash flow. For RRC, range's earnings and cash flow are highly sensitive to natural gas and NGL prices, which the company does not control and which depend on weather, storage levels, competing supply, and demand.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick EPD if you believe its drivers more; RRC if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the EPD and RRC guides.

EPD. EPD is typically held as an income holding rather than a high-growth one, so investors tend to weigh distribution coverage, leverage, and yield more than earnings multiples. Because it is an MLP, total return blends the cash distribution with modest growth from new projects. Figures are approximate, reflect data around Q1 2026 and mid-2026 unit prices, and move with the market.

RRC. Range trades at roughly 9x forward earnings and about 9.5x EV/EBITDA, valuations broadly in line with its Appalachian gas peers. First-quarter 2026 results beat consensus on both revenue and earnings, helped by liquids strength and pricing premiums, and the company reduced net debt while raising NGL guidance. As with any commodity producer, these figures move with natural gas and NGL prices and should be read as a snapshot rather than a trend.

Headline figures (approximate, 2026-06-26): EPD shows revenue (ttm) ~$51.6 billion, q1 2026 distributable cash flow coverage ~1.8x, distribution yield ~5.8% to 6.1%, annualized distribution per unit ~$2.20; RRC shows revenue (q1 2026) ~$1.03 billion, net income (q1 2026) ~$342 million, diluted eps (q1 2026) ~$1.44, production (q1 2026) ~2.21 Bcfe/day.

EPD and RRC are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined EPD and RRC exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.